Love Not the New World Order  - A Study

To Honor Jesus Christ, Glorify God, Encourage Believers, & Warn All
Est 03-16-2003 Changed 01-16-2010

This information is offered with the hope that YOU can come to KNOW the Lord personally.

Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world.  If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.        - 1 John 2:15
The question before us today - what is the object of our love?  Where is our hope placed?  Is it in our jobs?  Is our hope in our possessions?  Is our hope in our retirement? Is our hope in our comfortable life?  Is our hope in our businesses?  Is our hope in our houses?  Is our hope in our cars?  Is our hope in our church?  Is our hope in our democratic government?  Is our hope in our economy?  Is our hope in a peaceful and prosperous world?  Is our hope in the freedoms we enjoy?  Is our hope in our ,past times, entertainment, and pleasure?

Do we believe that all the world's problems will be fixed by MEN and that the world will continue to progress toward a utopian state of prosperity and freedom for all?
 The question here is - do we believe in God (and God's view of men ) or do we believe in men and the works of men?

Remember, obey the Bible, obey the law, give honor to whom honor is due, esteem others above self, pray, if possible live peaceably with all men, be content with what you have, be thankful, do not expect the world to be reformed-improved-blessed or made "christian" and let the Lord guide you into the patient waiting for His soon return.  Always remember that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. Remember that all of us are sinners and we are all in need of a savior.  Man, apart from faith in the work of Jesus Christ on the cross, is - by nature - the enemy of God.  It is trusting in man, and not the Lord, that has brought man to this point in history.  All of us will bow the knee to confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.  Will we do this freely now or will we do it when it is too late? 

This study is dedicated to the LORD JESUS CHRIST, the coming King.  It is written with the hope that believers will be edified by the evidence herein of His soon return and the amazing truth, accuracy, and complete reliability of the King James Bible, the Word of God. If the Lord is willing, perhaps He will bring some who read this to be saved.  For all it is my hope that some will return to the Bible and be awakened to the sobering reality of God's IMMINENT unfolding of the AWESOME events in the Book of REVELATION.  Even so, come Lord Jesus.

Before you proceed, you may need to read about antichrist-type thinking , a thing which all of us should be careful to avoid.

01-10-2004 (a)
                                      Will there Be a "World" Government?

Before we cite references supporting such a notion, let it be said that the objective that is being sought is different from the means to achieve it.  An "attempt" at "world" government is not the same as having a "world" government.  The desire for a "world" government is more of a drive for " peace", monetary profit ("globalism " of transnational corporations and the politicians they own), or " Vatican-religious-domination" (in reality the demise of Islam and Protestant fundamentalism).  In this sense, world government is more of a background phenomenon than a fulfillment of specific Bible prophecy.  The chaos of the rapture and the so-called "war on terrorism " (in reality, a world transforming scenario erupting into civil war, i.e., the Clash of Civilizations extolled by Harvard professor Huntington) will create what may be more accurately called an eventual "police state"  (see Revelation 13) with loosely joined separate political states.   In this regard (subsequent to the rapture), the precipitating event (or backdrop) is found in Revelation 6:3-4.  The operative phrase is kill one another (Revelation 6:3-4).  The operative " enemy" will be "terrorism ".   Another word for "terrorism " is "fundamentalism " and it will not matter if one is an Islamic fundamentalist, a Protestant fundamentalist, or a "Zionist."

And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see.    And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another : and there was given unto him a great sword .      -- Revelation 6:3-4  

It is said of the endtimes "kingdom":
And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided ; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. -- Daniel 2:41

A divided kingdom is not a "world" government in the strictest sense, but, since worship will be compelled universally, there will be a worldwide "religious kingdom." (See Revelation 13)

Here is more information regarding the background factors of the Book of Revelation .

It seems to me that the "world government conspiracy" is more often used as an anti-US sentiment to increase opposition to US "imperialism" in the Mideast or to coopt the anti-"big brother" movement among conservatives in the United States).  Eventually  Revelation 6:3-4 will be the result (but only after the Rapture which removes the mitigating effects of peace loving believers).  That is, attempts to stop "world government" or defeat "terrorism / fundamentalism " are the "cover stories" for what becomes the actual fulfillment of Revelation 6:3-4.

With this background in mind we can read the following with discernment.  Remember, the oft-cited warning - let men do what they will.  Believers are not to fight to win any ideological or political battles.  Ours is to make sure we are born again and nothing else. The Biblical description in Revelation 6 should be a sobering reality, especially to those clinging to any worldly hope.    The Bible says that those without Christ have "no hope."

End 01-10-2004 (a)

We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through… wide circles of American society and wide circles of the Christian community do not realize this fully… ”        
---Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood: the Struggle for World Dominion Between Pope John Paul II, Mikhail Gorbachev, and the Capitalist West, Simon and Schuster, 1990, p. 16

Martin is-

"a consummate Vatican insider and intelligence expert - is a former Jesuit and professor at the Vatican's Pontifical Biblical Institute "  (cover)

Martin tells-

"untold story behind the Vatican's role in today's winner-take-all race against time to establish, maintain, and control the first one-world government "  (cover)

Later editions of the book are subtitled- Pope John Paul II Versus Russia and the West for Control of the New World Order

Before he passed on, Martin was a personal friend of John Paul II and was intimately acquainted with the workings of the Vatican Curia (administration).  

In Martin's book, please note that the United States per se is NOT one of the three parties struggling to establish, maintain, and control the first one-world government.  The "capitalist west " - known as the Golden Internationale in the "Keys" - is a party.  This is to be contrasted with the "Red Internationale " of the former Soviet state.  The "Keys" represents Martin's view of the authority invested in the Pope to stand as the judge over the " Red" and " Golden Internationales ."

The "Golden Internationale" is a term chosen to depict the " Internationalist-Transnationalist " financial elite whose motive is purely profit, hence the term "Golden."   It refers to those industrial interests who do not consider themselves as citizens of any nation.  Therefore, it is impossible for them to be a traitor since their financial interests transcend all laws.  They

"don't really mind what sort of government a country has, provided that they can pay their bills."  Twelve to fifteen of these men control the flow of capital and goods throughout the entire world - as Bill Moyers recently discovered.
---Martin (page 326-327)

In this study, we'll refer to the "Golden Internationale " as the "merchants."  The "merchants" also include western political figures involved in the governments of the most powerful nations in Europe and the United States.  The economic aspects and the political aspects of the "merchants" are indistinguishable and for all intents and purposes make the politicians and the merchants of one mind in their objectives.  The politicians work for the business interests, without whom they could not even run for office, let alone be elected.
What does "World Government" mean?  The world will be

"dominated by an international bureaucracy which controls and directs every citizen and every nation for the good of all"
---Martin, p 341

"Each one [of the combatants] has in mind a particular grand design for one-world governance" and "they all give speeches about an end to the nation system"
---Martin, p 18

As an example of this winner-take-all race against time to establish, maintain, and control the first one-world government
the following quote is offered from Martin's description of Vatican II [ 1958-1965] which featured the emerging anti-United States and pro-communist strategy of the Vatican:
"Liberation was, therefore, no longer release from sin and its dire effects.  It was the struggle against oppression by big capital and by the authoritarian colonialist powers of the West - particularly the United States as THE ARCHVILLAIN of ALL HUMAN HISTORY."  (emphasis added)
---Martin p. 260 

The reader should know that

"if government is "force" - as George Washington so simply and accurately defined it - then world government is "world force"."
---William Jasper,  Global Tyranny, Step by Step, Western Islands, 1992, p. 31

On March 10, 1962, a study was delivered to the White House entitled, "A World Effectively Controlled By the United Nations ", written by Lincoln P. Bloomfield.  The study was commissioned by the State Department (under Dean Rusk) and  Bloomfield, while writing the study, was working as a professor for the Center for International Studies, MIT.
---Jasper, p. 29

The main points of the study were

"National disarmament is a condition sine qua non for effective control.. ."
"The essential point is the transfer of the most vital element of sovereign power from the states to a supranational government."  " The OVERWHELMING CENTRAL FACT would still be the loss of control of their military power by individual nations."  (emphasis added)
---Jasper, p. 32

"The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty ... has passed. "
---General Secretary Boutros-Gali, Jan 31, 1992, cited on p. 19 in Global Tyranny

In the course of carrying this out they (the UN crowd) view the United States of America as "the greatest threat to global peace and stability. "
---Jasper, p. 10

Understand that both Bloomfield, the author of the 1962 study for the State Department, and Rusk (the then Secretary of State) were members of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations).  The CFR is being attacked (in Jasper's book) for its secret role in the development and initiation of the world government conspiracy.  Later in the study we discuss the initiation issue.  For now, understand the "bogeyman" CFR is not the only player.

The influence of the "merchants" transcends presidential politics.
An example of the centralization and continuity of this power is manifest in the person of John J. McCloy, the "first citizen of the CFR", according to Henry Kissinger, another CFR member.
Mr. McCloy did ALL of the following:
a. Jean Monnet's (the "father" of the EEC) lawyer
b. Assistant Secretary of War (1941)
c. Funneled $15 billion to Stalin
d. Involved in the decision to drop the bomb on Japan
e. Fired Patton (for threatening the "world order")
f. Fired MacArthur (for opposing the U.N. crowd)
g. Legal arm of the Rockefellers
h. President of the World Bank (1946)
i. High Commissioner of Germany after WWII
j. OPEC (the international oil cartel) creator
k. Originated many New World Order projects of the Ford Foundation
l. Originated the EEC (the European Economic Community)
m. Counsel to the "seven sister" oil companies.
n. Appointed McNamara, Kissinger, and Rusk
o. A member of the Warren Commission (Kennedy assassination)
p. Selected Nixon's cabinet
q. Chairman of the powerful CFR ('53-'70)
r. Chairman of the Ford Foundation
s. Chairman of the Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank
t. Advisor and friend to nine presidents from Roosevelt to Reagan

The "merchants" knew as early as 1972 that the Soviet Union was going to be merged into the west "around mid-1990 ."  The Soviet Union did not "fall."  It was planned.  In February of 1972 at a White House Commerce Department Conference on " Business in the 1990's" it was said that a major topic was the " merger of East and West around mid-1990. "
---L Fletcher Prouty, JFK, The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, Birch Lane Press, 1992, p. 338

By the way, in the movie JFK, directed by Oliver Stone, the character played by Donald Southerland was supposed to be Prouty.

Along similar lines, it was admitted by Ford Foundation president H Rowan Gaither to a Congressional committee investigating the tax free foundations (in 1953) who were funding communist causes-

"We are continuing to be guided by [White House] directives ... to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union. "
---Jasper, p. xiv

Thus, the effort to merge East and West has been around for some time.  Powerful groups, the Vatican and "the merchants",  have shaped this merger for their own purposes, religious and economic. What Jasper fails to point out in his book is that the Vatican has been a primary user of the foundations to achieve its ends.  This is confirmed in the book Vatican Billions by Avro Manhattan, Chap 21-26.  The question of who initiated the merger is still open.

"In my view the Trilateral commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power--political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creation a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."
---Barry Goldwater, With No Apologies

"Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order."
---Declaration of Interdependence, signed by 124 members of Congress, January 30, 1976

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. "
---David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting

"Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
---Strobe Talbott, former Deputy Secretary of State and Bill Clinton's Oxford roommate, in Time, July 1992

"This regionalization is in keeping with the Trilateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept. "
---Zbignew Brezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance. "
---President George Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1, 1992

"The New World Order is a world that has a super-national authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order. "
---Willy Brandt, Former West German Chancellor and former chairman of the Fifth Socialist International

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. "
---David Rockefeller

"But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence. "
---David Rockefeller, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994

"A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order. "
---Brent Scowcroft, George Bush's National Security Advisor, on the eve of the Gulf War

"The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union). Out of these troubled times a New World Order can merge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders. "
George Bush, September 11, 1990

"The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind."
---George Bush, in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991

"NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order. "
---Henry Kissinger, campaigning for the passage of NAFTA

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a New World Order. "
---Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address to the United Nations, December 1988

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."
---Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs, July/August 1995

"In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down.. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion.' To use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. "
---Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs, April 1974

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans."
- Bill Clinton, U.S.A. Today, March 11, 1993

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."
---David Rockefeller, statement about Mao Tse-tung in The New York Times, August 10, 1973

"I want to extend condolences to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations."
---Al Gore, as he traveled to Marrakech, Morocco, for the signing of the new world trade agreement. Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied 'no fly' zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down two helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. The Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1994

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule."
---H. L. Mencken

"We've got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing - in terms of economic policy and environmental policy."
---Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colo.), presently with the United Nations

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed - and hence clamorous to be led to safety- and menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
---H. L. Mencken

"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's , to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies. . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
---Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University President whom Bill Clinton praised in his nomination address at the DNC.

See Tragedy and Hope, Caroll Quigley, Macmillan and Company, 1966.  This book is over 1,000 pages.

The 'Hope' in the title represents the man-made millennium of a collectivist one-world society which the world will enjoy when the 'network' achieves its goal of ruling the world. He says the 'network' already has such power and influence that it is now too late for the little people to turn back the tide. All who resist represent the 'Tragedy .' He urges us not to fight the noose which is already around our necks, because if we do we will only choke ourselves to death.

The real question about Carroll Quigley is not whether he told the truth in his 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, but - was he an "Insider" who talked (as he claimed) or a Vatican propagandist from the Catholic Georgetown University?  Interestingly enough, the 1966 book's arrival coincided with the new strategy of Vatican II [1958-1965 ] which made the United States "the arch-villian of all human history ."  Quigley says he "was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records." One might ask at this point - why has there been a steady increase in "conspiracy" literature since the 1960s, especially of the anti-Anglican/American establishment variety?  Is it to discredit the US and insure that the Vatican is preeminent in the emerging world order?

The answer is - there actually is a struggle going on to control the New World Order and the combatants are "telling on each other."  Another question to ask - how does the Vatican know so much about the other side (its supposed enemy)?  The answer could well be that the Vatican is playing on all sides of the game simultaneously. This is the thesis of Avro Manhattan and his book Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance , Chick Publications, 1986.  The answer is that most "conspiracy theorists" have been anti-American Vatican sponsored propagandists, who know a great deal about conspiracy since their sources of information are actually a part of the conspiracy.

Carroll Quigley died in 1977.  However, C-Span covered a seminar at Quigley's Georgetown University recently [1992-1993 ].  The seminar's speaker was a representative from the John Birch Society who discussed the "conspiracy" being conducted in America by the "power elite" and communism to overthrow the United States. 

Consider that the John Birch Society was founded in December, 1958 to act as an "educational" organization which served to warn Americans about the one-world government conspiracy of the "merchants", who were working closely with the communists. 1958 is an interesting year for the founding of the John Birch Society.  A major shift in Vatican policy took place on October 28, 1958.  Prior to this time, the CIA and the Vatican had worked closely together to defeat communism.  A new Pope was coronated on this date and he was to fulfill his pre-election promise to create a " reformation" as significant as the Protestant Reformation.  Who were his supporters?  According to Avro Manhattan- they were the KGB agents of Stalin within the Vatican Curia and College of Cardinals.

According to Malachi Martin, Stalin [who died in 1953, the year the CFR was founded and the year Congress investigated the tax free foundations' working with communist causes] had dissolved the Comintern (the subversive Communist Internationale) as early as 1943 because "he no longer needed it."  The only reason Stalin would not need the Comintern is that he had better structures in which to carry out his objectives.
---Martin, The Keys of This Blood, p. 220

In 1958 Stalin's agents in the Vatican succeeded in the election of Roncalli (after eleven bitterly fought ballots) to the papal office by outwitting the CIA agents in the Vatican.  Roncalli appropriately took the name of an anti-pope, Pope John XXIII - intent on fulfilling his preelection promise of creating a "reformation"

as significant as the Protestant Reformation.  [John XXIII's predecessor, Pope Pius XII, 1939-1958, had lead the Vatican Cold War intelligence operation versus the KGB.  It is a matter of fact that the Vatican was the CIA's intelligence center of operations during the Cold War.]

John XXIII started his "reformation" by driving out all the Jesuit CIA sympathizers (whom he called "pestilential rats") from the Vatican within 48 hours of his coronation.  He forbad Cardinal Spellman - the US mediator between Pope Pius XII and the Pentagon and Senate - to ever come to Rome.  Since Spellman - the unofficial link to Alan Dulles, head of the CIA, through his brother John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State - had visited Pius XII more than the cardinals resident in Rome, this naturally alarmed the CIA.
---Avro Manhattan, The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance , 1986, pp. 136-140

Consider what had happened under Pope Pius XII. Then, it is no wonder that the 1958-1963 papacy of John XXIII was considered a "reformation ."

During the Joe McCarthy era, Collier's Magazine (1951) was calling for a preemptive nuclear strike by the US on the USSR in 1952 on its front pages.

"A few years later, ... [in a speech broadcast worldwide in 27 languages] Pope Pius XII reiterated "the morality ... of a defensive war" (that is, of an atom and hydrogen war), calling for - as the London Times somberly described it, "what almost amounts to a crusade of Christendom " and what the Manchester Guardian bluntly called "the pope's blessing for a preventive war."

"In 1950, the "pilgrim statue" of our Lady of Fatima, who had started to travel in 1947, the very year of the outbreak of the Cold War, was sent by airplane, ... on the direct instructions of Pope Pius XII... to Moscow.  There, with the warm approval of Admiral Kirk, the American Ambassador, she was solemnly placed in the church of the foreign diplomats... "

For what specific reason? "To wait for the imminent liberation of Soviet Russia."
---Avro Manhattan

Francis Mathews, Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus, became in 1949 Secretary of the Navy.  All these activities culminated in a speech by Mathews on August 25, 1950 in which he said the US be "the first aggressors for peace" [and] "the initiators of a war of aggression ."
---Avro Manhattan

The Vatican became such a center of coordination of this orchestrated upcoming invasion of Russia that General Eisenhower met with the economic and military heads of twelve European nations in the Holy City "to organize the anti-Russian military front."  Eisenhower's words were " a new barbaric invasion " - exactly the same words as Pope Pius XII. The dates they were to accomplish their tasks were the same as those published in Colliers Magazine in 1951.

Other men granted audiences by Pius XII were Omar Bradley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs (end of Nov 1951), and Field Marshall Montgomery, Deputy Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe (Dec 6, 1951).  The pope's reception line looked like a Who's Who of the pentagons of the western world.
---Avro Manhattan

So, if a pro-communist Pope emerged after Pope Pius XII, it was indeed a "reformation."
However, the "war of aggression" never took place.   We do not know why.  Could it be the planned "merger" of the USSR with the United States via the Council of Foreign Relations (founded in 1953) which allowed the INCLUSION of the Vatican to share the power structure?  It is important to understand that the Vatican initially NEEDED the Cold War to prevent the Soviets from stealing their wealth and later to prohibit the two Cold War adversaries from merging and supplanting Vatican power.  Later the Vatican would continue its public alliance with the US while (behind the scenes) building a relationship with the communists. 

01-10-2004 (b)
Prior to Vatican II and the "reformation" within the papacy of John XXIII, the Vatican's primary visible political  position was pro-United States and anti-communist.  Since the Vatican was, in fact, the chief US intelligence source on communism during the Cold War, the "reformation " of John XXIII was an alarming development for the CIA.  If you wanted to say that "Intelligence Central" was the Vatican itself, you would be correct.  The CIA in particular and the United States government in general were well connected with the Vatican  through Allen Dulles (the head of the CIA) and Allen's brother, John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State. Along came the "reformation" of Pope John XXIII and the increasingly pro-communist positions of his successor Pope Paul VI.

The pro-soviet policies of Pope Paul VI became known as Ostpolitik .  They advanced to the point of being described by Malachi Martin (The Keys of This Blood, p 260)   as

"Liberation was, therefore, no longer release from sin and its dire effects.  It was the struggle against oppression by big capital and by the authoritarian colonialist powers of the West - particularly the United States as THE ARCHVILLAIN of ALL HUMAN HISTORY ." (emphasis added)   

Why is this important for today?  The answer is - if Vatican geopolitics had such an enormous impact in 1963; it still does today.
Consider that the Vatican aligned itself with the United States from 1939-1958, began it's Ostpolitik alignment with the communists in 1958 which continued until 1978, and then, after the death (murder?) of John Paul I began a policy (under John Paul II) which eventually aided Reagan to "overthrow" communism (see "The Secret Holy Alliance," Time , February 24, 1992, p. 28.  ).  So, since 1939 the Vatican has changed sides at least three times.  This does not count the open Marxism of portions of (if not the entire) Jesuit Order for over 20 years so well documented in the Jesuits by Malachi Martin. Further, while publicly aligning itself with Reagan and the United States, is it possible that the Vatican never relinquished its association (nourished for 20 years) with the communists?  The one principle that the Vatican has held is - if it promotes the hegemony of the Vatican, any political association is acceptable. They apparently have the ability and do coopt just about any political movement/government.

According to Aarons and Loftus Unholy Trinity, the Vatican was closely associated with anti-communist Nazis of WWII and helped these Nazis escape Europe through the Vatican "Ratlines."   Many Vatican connected operatives entered the US intelligence service.  You can read about communists infiltration of US intelligence in Unholy Trinity and in The Keys of This Blood by Malachi Martin.  Since the Vatican was connected with the communists at the same time they were ostensibly working with US intelligence, this made it easier for communists to enter US intelligence as well.  One needs a program to keep up with who is on which team.

[Mark Aarons and John Loftus, Unholy Trinity , How the Vatican's Nazi Networks Betrayed Western Intelligence to the Soviets, St. Martin's Press, New York]

Did the Vatican's new alliance with the USSR (and Ostpolitik) lead to a change in politics within the Kennedy White House which would have been opposed by the CIA's "Cold Warriors"?

The Assassination of JFK -  The Most Politically Revealing Event of the 20th Century

Joseph Kennedy's son, JFK, had stated that he did not want to make the same "mistakes" as his father.  Was this his father's well known anti-communism?  If so, JFK's intentions to reverse the anti-communism policy of the United States would place him in line with the new Vatican policy toward Russia (after Vatican II). 

It is well known that JFK (frequently cited as a traitor after the botched Bay-of-Pigs invasion even though apparently it was not his fault) made enemies among the power elite.  (A full page ad appeared in the Dallas paper the day he was murdered which stated that he was a traitor.) 

According to Oliver Stone's movie, JFK , the speech of Mr X (played by Donald Southerland) to New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison (played by Kevin Costner) in the shadow of the Washington Monument; the "military-industrial " complex had JFK killed because he opposed their plans.  In effect, this movie makes the "archvillain of all human history" guilty of the murder of JFK, thus making the movie a propaganda piece for the KGB and the Vatican against the CIA and the United States.

[Having read approximately 20 books on the Kennedy assassination and having watched Oswald be murdered on live television at the Dallas police station, I have always found this subject fascinating chiefly because the murder of JFK was covered up by the Warren Commission.  I was in my high school parking lot during 6th period when the announcement was made over the PA that the president was dead.  Where you were on Nov 22, 1963 and Sep 11, 2001 stand out in your memory]

Most of the evidentiary aspects of the Oliver Stone movie are correct, but the conclusions are designed to place the blame on an ideological, if not real, "enemy" - "defense contractors and big oil bankers."  This is non other than the "archvillain of all human history" - the capitalist west - the enemy of Vatican II.  [The "merchants" are called " USA Inc." and "The High Cabal" - a Winston Churchill term - in the book JFK by Fletcher Prouty. 1   [Note: in the movie JFK , the character played by Donald Sutherland IS Prouty.]    Footnotes for this section are referenced in red and listed at the end of the section.


What is a more lucid explanation is that JFK got caught in the transition from a Vatican Cold War posture (pre-1958) to the Vatican-Moscow Alliance (1958-1963) (to use Avro Manhattan's phraseology - in his book of the same name, actually Vatican-Moscow-Washington Alliance). 

Not insignificantly, the son-in-law of Khrushchev, Adzhubei, had visited both Pope John XXIII and JFK.  It was hard to figure on which side JFK stood, especially when the CIA was ostensibly anti-Soviet but the new private White House policies were pro-Soviet.  In fact, debate is heaviest about what JFK's policies were, because (it is naturally assumed) he was killed by those whose policies he opposed.  The reasoning is - figure out what his policies were and which side they opposed and you know who killed him.  Therefore, those that killed him are deliberately misrepresenting his policies to avoid being accused of murder.

The coverup tells you more than the murder itself.  COVERUP of this murder confirms the existence of a MAJOR struggle and is THE major symptom in the US of the on-going (1989-1992) strategies for control of Russia as the first step to controlling the rest of the world.

The papacy had begun its transition to a pro-Soviet alliance in 1958 under John XXIII and became even more focused under Paul VI who took over in 1963.  Representatives from the USSR were allowed to attend Vatican II Council, 1962-1965. Roman Catholicism became a tool of communism (to penetrate the West) in 1958 when Roncalli became John XXIII and started Vatican II 2, which resulted in the religion of serving MAN (not God) and his earthly home 3 .  The new religion is "the brotherhood of MAN," with religious unity followed by world government. 4   The papal transition to a pro-Soviet alliance (because it was so radical) may have been THE key motivational factor behind the murder of JFK.  To put the papal transition to a pro-Soviet policy in perspective and to understand how it could result in the murder of JFK, consider the following facts:

A.    From 1939-1958 the Vatican, under the leadership of Pope Pius XII, conducted a virulent anti-communist policy in conjunction with the US - chiefly the CIA.

B.    Stalin believed that if he could replace Pope Pius XII with a pro-communist pope, he could reverse the Vatican anti-Soviet Union policy.  His best agents from the Kremlin were given the mission of infiltrating the Vatican to achieve this objective.  After careful analysis Stalin concluded that the man for the job was Roncalli.  However, before Stalin could see his objective achieved, he died in 1953.  [The CIA and KGB files on Roncalli (Pope John XXIII) and Montini ( Pope Paul VI) were voluminous. The difference in the two files were the labels - the CIA file was labeled "red" and the KGB files were labeled "progressive." 5

C.     Also in 1953, Alan Dulles, head of the CIA, asked Pope Pius XII to kick Roncalli out of the Vatican, which was accomplished by giving Roncalli another assignment. 6

The reason - he was a pro-communist and was interfering with the CIA-Vatican Cold War (primarily a creature of the Vatican) against the Soviet Union.  (In addition, Roncalli's even more liberal comrade, Montini, was also given a non-Vatican assignment.)

D.    In 1958 Stalin's agents in the Vatican succeeded in the election of Roncalli (after eleven bitterly fought ballots) to the papal office by outwitting the CIA agents in the Vatican.  Roncalli appropriately took the name of an anti-pope, Pope John XXIII - intent on fulfilling his preelection promise of creating a "reformation" as significant as the Protestant Reformation. 

He started by driving out all the Jesuit CIA sympathizers (whom he called "pestilential rats") from the Vatican within 48 hours of his coronation.  He forbad Cardinal Spellman - the US mediator between Pope Pius XII and the Pentagon and Senate - to ever come to Rome.  Since Spellman - the unofficial link to Alan Dulles, head of the CIA, through his brother John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State - had visited Pius XII more than the cardinals resident in Rome, this naturally alarmed the CIA. 7

E.    In 1960 JFK was elected president - the first Catholic president of the US - and eventually made peace overtures toward the USSR.  The peace overtures were the first steps toward merger with the Soviet Union, such merger presently well underway.  In fact, the CIA (1960) deliberately forced down the U-2 spy plane in Russia - with Gary Powers aboard - in order to ruin the peace image Eisenhower was to present at an upcoming meeting with Khrushchev.  Of course, this is because the CIA officially opposed the entente with Russia.  Later, JFK would say that he was going " to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces" because they obviously did not support the new presidential policies, but worked against him vis-a-vis the Soviet Union. 

F.     In the spring of 1961 Attorney General Bobby Kennedy began secretly meeting with Georgi Bolshakov, Soviet intelligence agent. 8

G.    In 1962 Pope John XXIII convened the 2nd Vatican Council, the "ecumenical" council, to promote the world "peace " movement, and the fights against hunger, poverty, and social injustice.  (He had announced his intentions to do this within 3 months of his coronation.)  One of the chief principles of Vatican II was world unity, religiously and politically, in which the Vatican was demonstrating that it was an "inclusive " institution.  (Orthodox church officials, agents from the anti-God materialistic atheistic Soviet Union were invited to attend by John XXIII himself.) 9
H.     On January 30, 1962, Alexei Adzhubei, Khrushchev's son-in-law and editor of Izvestia, the communist party newspaper, visited with JFK. 10  It was this meeting, said Jesuit educated Fidel Castro, "that started everything ." 11  In fact, it was Castro who said - just before JFK's death -that "He [JFK] has the possibility of becoming the greatest president of the US...He has come to understand many things over the last few months...I'm convinced that anyone else would be worse. " 12  Likewise, on March 3, 1963, this same Adzhubei met with John XXIII in the Vatican to confirm "what the Vatican and the Kremlin had been discussing for months, namely, the mutual acceptance of a general guideline for the newly born Vatican-Moscow alliance ." 13 

     I.    In 1963, the even more pro-communist Montini was elected as Pope Paul VI - continuing the accelerating liberal trend at the Vatican.  Manhattan describes John XXIII as "socialist " and Paul VI as "pink".

J.    In 1963 JFK was assassinated by agents of the CIA- according to Plausible Denial by Lane. 14  This was to reverse the pro-Soviet policies of the president - which were in conformance with the Vatican's new world "peace" movement. 

K.    In 1964 the Warren Commission conducted an investigation into the assassination.  One of its members was Alan Dulles, ex-head of the CIA, and the man who had Roncalli and Montini kicked out of the Vatican, only to see each of them return with a vengeance successively in 1958 and 1963 as the "socialist" and "pink" Holy Father, respectively. [The reason that Dulles was EX-head of the CIA was that JFK had fired him.]  

In a debate on December 4, 1964, with Mark Lane, A.L. Wirin, an ACLU leader in California, said

"I thank God for Earl Warren.  He saved us from a pogrom.  He saved our nation.  God bless him for what he has done in establishing Oswald as the lone assassin." 16  Wirin admitted in the same debate that he would feel the same way even if Oswald was innocent.

The Warren Commission consisted of 6 subcommittees:
Oswald's background,
Oswald's time in the Soviet Union and USMC,
Oswald's activities on November 22,
Jack Ruby's background,
how Ruby entered the basement unnoticed, and
the effectiveness of the Secret Service on the 22nd. 

To quote Lane, who gave a similar statement to the Warren Commission,

"I would have formed a seventh panel.  It would have undertaken the assignment of discovering who had killed President Kennedy.  Evidence as to that matter could reach the Warren Commission only through the panel charged with exploring Oswald's movements.  The lack of a seventh panel demonstrated the authorities ineluctable commitment to a preconceived notion." 17

     Lane says, somewhat tongue in cheek, of his appearance as a witness that

"not having been present at the scene appeared to be a prerequisite for qualification as a commission witness." 18

The point of all this is that Malachi Martin refers to the Vatican as a " geopolitical power tool" in The Keys of This Blood. Apparently, the power of the Vatican is both feared and sought on a scale that is difficult for us to conceive.


1 L. Fletcher Prouty, JFK - the CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, Birch Lane Press, Carol Commincations, Inc, New York, 1992, p. xiv.

2 Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, the Struggle for World Dominion between Pope John Paul II, Mikhail Gorbachev, and the Capitalist West, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1990, p. 256

3 Ibid., p. 259

4 Ibid., p. 299

5 Avro Manhattan, The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance,     Chick Publications, Chino, CA, 1986, p. 130

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid., pp. 136 - 140

8 Michael R. Bechloss, The Crisis Years, Kennedy and Khrushchev, 1960-1963, Edward Burlingame Books, New York, 1991, pp. 274-275

9 Martin, p. 256-257

10 Bechloss, p. 627

11 Ibid., p. 627

12 Mark Lane, Plausible Denial, Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK?, Thunder's Mouth Press, New York, 1992, p. 351, citing Time Magazine, December 11, 1963

13 Manhattan, p. 153

15 Mark Lane, Rush To Judgment , Thunder's Mouth Press, New York, 1992

16 Lane, Plausible Denial , p. 52

17 Ibid., p. 23

18 Ibid.

End 01-10-2004 (b)

As preposterous as all this may sound to the unitiated, consider that in a study of 1963 by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency of the Peace Research Institute

"...WE BENEFIT ENORMOUSLY FROM THE CAPABILITY OF THE SOVIET POLICE SYSTEM...the breakup of the Russian Communist empire today would doubtless be conducive to freedom, but would be a GREAT DEAL MORE CATASTROPHIC FOR WORLD ORDER. "  (emphasis added)
---Cited by Jasper, p. 36

In the already cited State Department commissioned study of March 1962 by Bloomfield it was stated that

"the subordination of states to a true world government appears impossible; but if the communist dynamic were greatly abated, the West, MIGHT WELL LOSE WHATEVER INCENTIVE IT HAS FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT."  (emphasis added)
---Cited by Jasper, p. 36

So, the existence of the Soviet threat was an "incentive for World Government " and the loss of the "Soviet Police System "  would have been "catastrophic for World Order."   There is your answer.

Now that the "communist dynamic" has supposedly abated, a new publicdynamic is needed to promote the New World Order.  As usual there will always be plenty of the intellectually elite to provide a rationale to pursue whatever is the day's desired policy. Meanwhile, do not overlook the dormant "Soviet Police System."

"John Paul and Gorbachev may be alone stalking on the geopolitical plane. But WAITING for Gorbachev in John Paul's BACKYARD is a HOST of SUPPORTERS of Gorbachevism."
---Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, p. 312

"To tell anyone in the West -any of the participants in the entrepreneurial activities of America and Europe, anyone in the Western media, anyone in the scientific community or in the academic faculties of colleges and universities- that ALL OF THEM, along with the leading theologians and Church dignitaries the world over, HAD BEEN THOROUGHLY GROUNDED IN THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MARXISM would be to elicit hoots of derision and self-righteous cries of protest. "

"Pope John Paul's answer to such hoots and cries, however, is to point to Gramsci's [an Italian Catholic who penetrated Lenin's system] ghost, which HAS THOROUGHLY PENETRATED ALL OF THESE GROUPS with the Communist revolutionary sense of immanence . "
---Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, p. 265

Gramsci, an "intellectual product of Roman Catholic society ", founded a newspaper in 1919 called The New Order. He spent time in Russia trying to work with the communists, leaving in 1923. He believed in using Leninist geo-political forces to
"conquer the MIND, not streets and cities, by endorsing unity, consensus, and pacification"
---Malachi Martin, p. 242

"Though he had predicted it all, it might have boggled even Gramsci's mind to see the degree to which governments and individuals in the Christian, capitalist West responded to his anonymous revolution with their willing consent and their DOWNRIGHT COOPERATION with the Soviet purpose regarding them. "
---Malchi Martin, p. 6

John Paul II believes that-
"global system of economics and government" is expanding per the " blueprint of Gramsci" toward a "one-world government ,"
---Malachi Martin, p. 157

The pope praises Gorbachev asking, "Has the society of nations been taken unconsciously captive by someone who may be the prime master in the exquisite art of political illusion on a grand scale?"
---Malachi Martin, p. 192

The communists felt that

"in Gramsci's blueprint, they had stumbled onto the COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FORMULA PAR EXCELLENCE. They knew he had provided...the Kremlin with what could be described -in appropriate KGB parlance- as the MOST FAR-REACHING EXERCISE OF DECEPTION EVER EXECUTED by the Party-State..."  (* emphasis added)
---Malachi Martin, p. 253

In fact it is said by Malachi Martin that the Catholic third secret of Fatima was

---Malachi Martin, p. 634

KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn said in his 1984 book New Lies for Old that there would be a "false liberalization" in the USSR and Eastern block.
---Cited by Jasper in Global Tyranny, p. 251

In the book At the Highest Levels, the Inside Story of the End of the Cold War, by Bechloss and Talbott, it is said that Bush made secret efforts to PREVENT the breakup of the Soviet Union and KEEP Gorbachev in power.
"Bush and Gorbachev's excessive reliance on each other contributed to Gorbachev's fall from power and Bush's own collapse less than a year later. "
---Bechloss and Talbott, At the Highest Levels

The United States and Europe are-
"CAUGHT in the beginnings of a political EMBRACE whose ONLY PURPOSE is to CONTROL THEM BOTH, and thus make inevitable the harnessing of their economic power to consolidate a veritable Leninist empire."
---Malachi Martin, p. 483

How successful has Marxist-Leninism been in influencing America?

Immanence refers to the fact that the here and now is everything; there being no hereafter.  This type of thinking is popular because people are more interested in what they want than what God wants.

The whole "rights" movement - human rights, civil rights, gay rights, MY rights to an education, a job, welfare, etc. - control our thinking.  It is virtually impossible for a politician to speak without using the word "rights."  Everyone is concerned with THEIR rights.  Even children have "rights" over parents and the government is defining what it means to be a parent.  God-given authority is under all-out assault.  The authority of the man within the family has been completely undermined.  TV sitcoms are made to exaggerate the ideas of "conservatism" and respect for authority to the point of mockery. 

Consensus has become the byword.  No one can be "wrong".  All must be "right."  Political correctness has made people to stop thinking.  Unity through diversity is a political tool.  Anything that points out differences is "divisive."  Truth is relative and anyone who says they have truth is labeled a "bigot."

Sin is a "lifestyle."  Anything is acceptable if it is your personal choice.  Individual responsibility is lost and "society" (the infrastructure) is the problem.  Class warfare, envy, and hatred are promoted - a Leninist tactic.

Even religion takes on a "this-worldly" attitude - teaching the "prosperity" gospel and blessings now for all.  Evangelists come on television and teach us how to build investments and conduct business, read the stock market, avoid the coming currency collapse, and fix the national debt.

In spite the Vatican's promotion of "liberation theology" since Vatican II, according to its own spokesman, Malachi Martin, this will not always be true-

"The Neo-Catholicism of the anti-Church [anti-doctrine] will mingle with and not be clearly -and DELIBERATELY- separated and distinguished from the pockets of genuine traditional Catholicism ... But inevitably the two will separate WHEN THE PENETRATION IS CONSUMMATED ... the endGAME par excellence. "  (emphasis added)
---Malachi Martin, The Keys of this Blood, p. 484

Eventually, it will be said, as a matter of public policy apparently-
"Outside the Catholic Church, there is NO SALVATION" (emphasis added)
---Malachi Martin, p. 311

Can there be any doubt as to the fact that there will be a world government?   The Vatican, the "merchants", and Russia are going to great lengths to insure that they are winning in today's winner-take-all race against time to establish, maintain, and control the first one-world government.

Why are they going to all the trouble if there is not actually going to be a world government?


Friends, these developments happen subtley.   Take for example an Executive Order signed by the President on Dec 17, 2009.

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
December 17, 2009

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

- – - – - – -

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

----- End of Order -----


Nudge, nudge folks… This seems a minor change but let us break it out for you as we see it. Let’s look at the section from Executive Order 12425.

Here’s the text of 2(c), which this Executive Order now has applying to Interpol:

(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.

This now says that Interpol is no longer subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Their premises or staff can no longer be searched either. Their files are not subject to legal subpoena or discovery. Our government could just hand documents and files over to Interpol and Americans would no longer have access to them. Interpol can legally keep files now on all citizens of the US with no right to redress.

In reality, we have just handed over our sovereignty. Interpol headquarters in the US is currently headquartered in the Department of Justice. A ‘separate’ Interpol agency has been created in the DOJ – let that sink in for a moment. Interpol has been granted diplomatic immunity now by Obama – they have exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, US taxes and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. This action could also be used to divulge American military secrets and a whole host of horrific practices having to do with going after our military. It’s the road to internationalism on steroids.   [there's some "change" for you]

I contend this is the foundation for an international governing and policing body. A modern day SS here in the US if you like. Remember how Obama wanted to create a civilian police force? Well, it’s here, just from a direction I never saw it coming from. I really believe you will see Interpol police forces on US soil in the near future. It will resemble the Gestapo and their intelligence gathering techniques. This police force would not be subject to our normal Constitutional oversights – remember, no search and seizure etc. You have to admire the evil genius behind all this. Just stunning.

Friends, the Lord is coming soon.  Are you ready?   Do you plan on living through this?  INTERPOL has its US headquarters in the Department of Justice.  Anything inside our government that needs to be be concealed can simply be turned over to INTERPOL.

You can go here and listen to the Dec 22nd show which has a discussion of the Executive Order..

You have to go past the discussion of healthcare.

End 01-16-2010

World Order Study Index

First Page of Love Not the New World Order

How Is A Man Saved?

Home Page

Please e-mail us with questions or comments today.   If you need someone to lead a Bible study, let us know.  

"I am the way, the truth, and the life" - Jesus Christ
John 14:6