Dark Sentences

To Honor Jesus Christ, Glorify God, Encourage Believers, & Warn All
Est 07-07-2005 Changed 11-06-2011
 

This information is offered with the hope that YOU can come to KNOW the Lord personally.




Daniel 8:23   And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance , and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up .

Daniel 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.

The antichrist causes craft to prosper (Daniel 8:25).  Craft in Strong's Concordance is word # 4820 and means
"
fraud, deceit, and treachery."  

He also shall  understand dark sentences in Daniel 8:23.  Interestingly enough, the Strong's Concordance word for dark AND  sentences is the SAME word,  # 2420.  They mean "
a puzzle; hence a trick" saying.  The expression comes from the root word #2330 which means "to put forth."   This must mean that the eventual antichrist will purposely use (put forth) language designed to trick the hearer.

Consequently, since the same word (2420) is used twice, the "
trick" is to give out double meanings in the same dark sentences. The essence of an intelligence operation is misleading information (dual information).  The antichrist (DURING HIS RISE) understands  dark sentences.   Therefore, he must understand them when used by others.  Who are the others?  Daniel 8:23 tells us that when the transgressors are come to the full.  Notice that there is more than one transgressor.  TransgressorS (plural) come to the full.  These transgressors apparently use dark sentences which the Assyrian antichrist understands.

We have shown previously how the policy of a "war on terror" could fulfill the role of antichrist in confirming the "covenant" in effect during the coming tribulation. The antichrist, known as the Assyrian in the Bible, therefore will have been (and will be) involved in intelligence operations in the "war on terror" to establish "democracy."

A few examples of dual meanings (dark sentences) - "peace process" really translates into "war", and (for some) "war on terror" means "war on Islam" later resulting in "war on the Christians of the West".  Moreover, "democracy" closely resembles "autocracy" and "freedom" looks too much like "martial law." By the time the Assyrian antichrist rises to power he will, in all likelihood, have already become well versed in the art of dark sentences.  No matter the intent or motives of individuals or governments or government leaders, like us all individually, governments and their leaders had better do some serious self examination, lest they become transgressors and when their policy is come to the full, they will have opened the door to the Assyrian antichrist in a place the Bible has already identified for us.

Sound far fetched?  Consider the Bible verse that falls BETWEEN the two verses we just discussed.
Daniel 8:24   And his power shall be mighty, but
not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practice, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.

It is clear that the Assyrian antichrist will have power GIVEN TO HIM, verse 24.  Where does he get this power?  The previous verse (23) says when the transgressors are come to the full marks the time for the
fraud, deceit and treachery of the Assyrian.  If we look carefully, the Bible tells us that the Assyrian is going to receive a "crown".

When this crown is given to the Assyrian, he will also have a military at his disposal.  Can you think of any place in the world that already has a military on the ground and where this place desperately needs a leader to change the direction of its angry peoples, some of whom can only be coopted by the use of dark sentences?  A place where "regime change" and the doctrine of "preemptive war" mimics the battlegrounds described in Daniel chapter 11:36-45 (which ends with a "palace" in Jerusalem) Which mimics the war campaign of Revelation chapter 6?

--
Note on "conspiracy" theories:

Since the antichrist and the transgressors are going to practice fraud, deceit, and treachery (dark sentences) whose real nature is inherently and deliberately difficult to comprehend, is this not a conspiracy by definition?  Merriam-Webster definition of conspire: to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act.  Since the Bible says, God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie (2 Thess 2:11), then the very nature of the endtimes deception makes it a conspiracy.  An example is Mystery Babylon the Great.  If she is a Mystery, then, she will be hidden from the people at large.    Have you ever asked yourself this question - How will it happen that the peace and safety touted by the world will actually become as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.  How will it happen that she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication?  How will it happen that God will call for a sword against him throughout all my mountains [kingdoms], saith the Lord GOD: every man's sword shall be against his brother?  How will the Lord accomplish this except through men? Is the Lord going to magically cause men to suddenly start killing each other for reasons the men know not?  Or is He going to prepare a way?  See, for example, be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself (Eze 38:7).


07-21-2005
Already, the intelligence effort in Iraq is increasing, making intelligence the premium asset for future operations.  Quotes are from Janes Intelligence (Copyright Janes Intelligence Digest, Jul 22, 2005)

the US Army plans to establish a joint intelligence centre to aid counter-insurgency efforts and The fledgling Iraqi intelligence services set up in mid-2004 under then-interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi are largely funded by CIA, which now maintains in Baghdad the biggest foreign station in its history, with more than 500 personnel. This eclipses its Saigon station at the height of the Vietnam War...

There have also been persistent reports that some of the 20,000 contractors operating in Iraq outside of military control, are working undercover for the CIA and that some are alleged to be running 'deaths squads' similar to those that operated in Vietnam under the CIA's Phoenix Programme which was charged with assassinating suspected Vietcong officials. Given such rumours, it is hardly surprising that these men - mainly ex-soldiers from the US and Europe who also work as bodyguards, interrogators and prison staff - have become prime targets for the insurgents.

End 07-21-2005


07-30-2005

It has long been preached that Russia is Magog and Russia will attack Israel.  Well (even considering the source), is it a legitimate question to ask 'could it be, at least indirectly, the results of actions of the United States, or at least some elements of the intelligence community connected with the US?'  We have already established that Magog invaders are partly from the Caucasus regions.  Now read portions of this speech by Vladislav Surkov, Putin's top aid.  (Actually, the whole article is interesting, but we'll limit the quotes to what is relevant, but you probably should read it all.)  Imagine that Surkov is a conservative US Congressman, a loyal patriot, who can not believe what is happening to surrender American sovereignty to NAFTA, CAFTA, globalism, etc and who does not want to give up certain liberties for "safety"..  Surkov is speaking to a business forum.  The suffering of the Russian people has been enormous.  They lost 10,000,000 people in WWII, just one example.  Stalin was reported to have killed millions more.  They suffered greatly as a result of the "fall" and the "revolution" of 1992 and the incredible inflation.

http://www.mosnews.com/interview/2005/07/12/surkov.shtml

A system as complex, as our country, can not afford fast and dramatic changes. Democracy is not our only objective. We care about the Russian Federation’s sovereignty....

The world has to be integrated, but the value of national cultures does not decrease, it only grows instead. One has to safeguard sovereignty. There is also the immediate task of fighting terrorism, that threatens our country’s integrity, and, therefore, threatens our sovereignty. The Caucasus is [problem] number one. Unfortunately, the situation isn’t getting any better there. It is even getting worse. It looks like an underground fire. And we’ve got nothing to boast about there.
 
Today we witness definite movement by Finland, Estonia and the EU on the issue of Finno-Ugrian nations. It has suddenly been discovered that we [Russia] opress them somehow [does this sound familiar?]. They are discriminated against in our country [does this sound familiar?]. And regions, where these Finno-Ugrians constitute a majority of the population, do hold a strategic amount of our oil reserves. I am not a fan of conspiracy theories. [Every politician, reporter, and researcher might as well have "not a fan of conspiracy theories" on his lapel,  chuckle, so he can appear "reasonable".  The emperor has no clothes.] But this is obviously a premeditated system of operations [against Russia]. Last week there was a resolution in PACE about how “we” oppress the Finno-Ugric nations (the Hants, the Mansi, the Chuvash, the Komi peoples etc). These are yesterday’s schemes, and they’re evident. And I didn’t even start to mention all those “orange revolutions”, about humanitarian institutes’ activities. It’s common knowledge, that Freedom House is headed by Woolsey, who used to be the head of the CIA. It takes an idiot to believe in the humanitarian mission of this “establishment” [Surkov uses the word “kontora”, which means “office” in Russian and used to be a codename of the KGB in Soviet times]. We also should not forget, that specific circles in those countries are also pursuing similar tasks. We have to take this into account in our work...

In spite of the integrity of Western economics, the French elite is considered as French, and the German as German. I think that while the Russian ruling elite is still an offshore aristocracy, till it understands, maybe not in this generation, that it is, for all that, a national bourgeoisie, we will have nothing good in our country. We will dangle in a critical gap.

The sovereignty of Russia is at stake is what Surkov is saying.  So, before we ride off into the sunset proud of our "overthrowing the evil empire" we had better give pause for thought as to what is coming to the whole world

If "humanitarian mission" is not a dark sentence, then, "orange revolutions" do not kill people.


End 07-30-005


08-21-2005

from the website-
http://www.middleeast.org/premium/read.cgi?version=0.2.6&num=4&month=7&year=2005&function=text&year=2005&month=7
Once again, I am not attempting to attribute bad motives to our leaders.  God put these men in office and made them think the way they do to fulfill His will.  However, from the link above we can see clearly that the scenario that Seymour Hersh described as "riding with the bad boys" is clearly in play in the Middle East.  These developments are certainly going to be part of the Dark Sentences played out in the covert and military world which will eventually be adopted by the antichrist himself. 

One must consider that the source of this information is Moscow, who is worried about the presence of US special forces in the southern Caucasus region and elsewhere.  But friends, someone has to be the worldwide enforcer for the coming world order and we know the antichrist arises "not by his own power." Daniel 8:24).  Who else is it going to be?  I have no way to verify the accuracy of the following, but, I have seen similar reports in various places.  We know that Dark Sentences is going to take place because the Bible tells us that it will.  Could this be a description of its inception?

American Terror? 
By Chris Floyd

01/21/2005 "Moscow Times" -- More than two years ago, we wrote here of a secret Pentagon plan to foment terrorism by sending covert agents to infiltrate terrorist groups and goad them into action -- in other words, committing acts of murder and destruction. The purpose was two-fold: first, to bring the terrorist groups into the open, where they could be counterattacked; and second, to justify U.S. military attacks on the countries where the terrorists were operating -- attacks which, in the Pentagon's words, would put those nations' "sovereignty at risk." It was a plan that countenanced -- indeed, encouraged -- the deliberate murder of innocent people and the imposition of U.S. military rule anywhere in the world that U.S. leaders desired.

This plan is now being activated. 

In fact, it's being expanded, as The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh revealed last week. Not only will U.S.-directed agents infiltrate existing terrorist groups and provoke them into action, but the Pentagon itself will create its own terrorist groups and "death squads." After establishing their terrorist "credentials" through various atrocities and crimes, these American-run groups will then be able to ally with -- and ultimately undermine -- existing terrorist groups


Top-level officials in the Pentagon, the U.S. intelligence services and the Bush administration confirmed to Hersh that the plan is going forward, under the direction of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- just as we noted here in November 2002. Through a series of secret executive orders, George W. Bush has given Rumsfeld the authority to turn the entire world into "a global free-fire zone," a top Pentagon adviser says. These secret operations will be carried out with virtually no oversight; in many cases, even the top military commanders in the affected regions will not be told about them. The American people, of course, will never know what's being done in their name.

The covert units -- including the Pentagon-funded terrorist groups and hit squads -- will be operating outside all constraints of law and morality. "We're going to be riding with the bad boys," one insider told Hersh. Another likened it to the palmy days of the Reagan-Bush years: "Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador? We founded them and we financed them. The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about it." Indeed, we reported here last summer that Bush has already budgeted $500 million to fund local paramilitaries and guerrilla groups in the most volatile areas of the world, a measure guaranteed to produce needless bloodshed, destruction and suffering for innocent people already ravaged by conflict. 
[An interview with Hersh can be read here-
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/11/142250 ]

The activation of the Pentagon terrorist operation is part of Bush's second-term expansion of the "war on terror." Despite some obfuscating rhetoric about "diplomacy," [Dark Sentences] the Bush regime is pressing ahead with a hard-line strategy aimed at opening new military fronts in the "global free-fire zone." Any dissenting voices within the government are being ruthlessly purged. The Pentagon's secret forces are set for operations in at least 10 countries, and Bush insiders "repeatedly" told Hersh that "Iran is the next strategic target."  [Will this provoke an Iranian attack?]

Iran has long been a focus of the small clique of "global dominationists" -- led by Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney and their acolytes -- who engineered the invasion of Iraq.
[You can read a history of the so-called neo-cons, whose advice the president is heeding, on Congressman Ron Paul's website- http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm ]  This group is determined to "whack Iran," as one insider put it, and they're not at all discouraged by the debacle in Iraq; indeed, to them it's a rousing success. Their first objective -- openly stated years ago, before Bush took office -- was the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime and the planting of a U.S. "military footprint" in Iraq. This has now been done. The fact that it has plunged the Iraqi people into a hell of violence, chaos, terror and extremism is of no real concern to the clique. Their lofty rhetoric about "freedom" and "liberation" is meaningless sham, shuck and jive for the rubes [Dark Sentences]. By the admission of the clique's own publications, they seek strategic control over the world's energy resources in order to preserve and expand American geopolitical and economic hegemony in the new century.  [Do a search for Project for the New American Century]. Everything else -- including the security of the American people, put at increasing risk by the clique's reckless policies -- is of secondary importance. 

U.S. forces are already conducting military reconnaissance inside Iran in preparation for strikes on alleged nuclear weapons facilities, Hersh reports. The Pentagon is feverishly updating war plans for a "maximum ground and air invasion of Iran," incorporating the new staging areas now available in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, while employing an Iranian terrorist group, MEK, to launch covert ops and terrorist acts against Tehran. MEK was once given sanctuary by Hussein, who used the group as a brutal enforcer against Kurd and Shiite insurgents. Now Bush, "riding with the bad boys," has embraced the MEK murderers as his own. 

In their ignorance and arrogance, the Bushists will almost certainly strike at Iran -- despite the fact that even Iranian dissidents support the effort to make their nation a nuclear power and would join the mullahs in retaliation. The result will be a conflict far surpassing the horror and magnitude of the Iraq disaster.


In our original report on the Pentagon's terror scheme, we wrote: "Bush and his cohorts are plunging the world into an abyss, an endless night of murder and terror -- wholesale, retail, state-sponsored, privatized; of fear and degradation, servility, chaos, and the perversion of all that's best in us." Now the night has come. Now the United States stands openly -- even proudly -- for terrorism, torture and the Hitlerian principle of aggressive war. America has fallen into the pit -- and the hopes of the world go with it.

[Sounds like the worst kind of propaganda, but, when the Bible says they shall kill one another, to what is it referring?  If the United States is "riding with the bad boys" and calling it "democracy" and "freedom", have you got a better description than Dark Sentences?  We will reap what we sow.  The principle of preemptive war is a long held doctrine of the neo-cons, who as it curiously turns out, are a by product of the left in the 1960s (so says Congressman Ron Paul's website above)  (and we know where the merger of the left into "conservatism" started) .]

End 08-21-2005


08-24-2005

from the wesbite-
http://www.aina.org/news/20050821114510.htm
we read of more confimation concerning the early stages of the development of the they-shall-kill-one-another mentality-

BASRA, Iraq -- Shiite and Kurdish militias, often operating as part of Iraqi government security forces, have carried out a wave of abductions, assassinations and other acts of intimidation, consolidating their control over territory across northern and southern Iraq and deepening the country's divide along ethnic and sectarian lines, according to political leaders, families of the victims, human rights activists and Iraqi officials.

While Iraqi representatives wrangle over the drafting of a constitution in Baghdad, forces represented by the militias and the Shiite and Kurdish parties that control them are creating their own institutions of authority, unaccountable to elected governments, the activists and officials said. In Basra in the south, dominated by the Shiites, and Mosul in the north, ruled by the Kurds, as well as cities and villages around them, many residents say they are powerless before the growing sway of the militias, which instill a climate of fear that many see as redolent of the era of former president Saddam Hussein.

The parties and their armed wings are sometimes operating independently, and other times as part of Iraqi army and police units trained and equipped by the United States and Britain and controlled by the central government. Their growing authority has enabled them to seize territory, confront their perceived enemies and provide patronage to their followers. Their rise has come because of a power vacuum in Baghdad and their own success in the January elections.

Since the formation of a government this spring, Basra, Iraq's second-largest city, has witnessed dozens of assassinations, claiming members of the former ruling Baath Party, Sunni political leaders and officials of competing Shiite parties. Many have been carried out by uniformed men in police vehicles, according to political leaders and families of the victims, with some of the bullet-riddled bodies dumped at night in a trash-strewn parcel known as The Lot. The province's governor said in an interview that Shiite militias have penetrated the police force; an Iraqi official estimated that as many as 90 percent of officers were loyal to religious parties.

Across northern Iraq, Kurdish parties have employed a previously undisclosed network of at least five detention facilities to incarcerate hundreds of Sunni Arabs, Turkmens and other minorities abducted and secretly transferred from Mosul, Iraq's third-largest city, and from territories stretching to the Iranian border, according to political leaders and detainees' families. Nominally under the authority of the U.S.-backed Iraqi army, the militias have beaten up and threatened government officials and political leaders deemed to be working against Kurdish interests; one bloodied official was paraded through a town in a pickup truck, witnesses said.

"I don't see any difference between Saddam and the way the Kurds are running things here," said Nahrain Toma, who heads a human rights organization, Betnahrain, with offices in northern Iraq and has faced several death threats.

Toma said the tactics were eroding what remained of U.S. credibility as the militias operate under what many Iraqis view as the blessing of American and British forces. "Nobody wants anything to do with the Americans anymore," she said. "Why? Because they gave the power to the Kurds and to the Shiites. No one else has any rights."

"Here's the problem," said Majid Sari, an adviser in the Iraqi Defense Ministry in Basra, who travels with a security detail of 25 handpicked Iraqi soldiers. "They're taking money from the state, they're taking clothes from the state, they're taking vehicles from the state, but their loyalty is to the parties." Whoever disagrees, he said, "the next day you'll find them dead in the street."

British officials, whose authority runs through Basra and parts of southern Iraq, have called the killings "totally unacceptable."

"We are aware of allegations that men in police uniforms, whether they are genuine policemen or not, are carrying out serious crimes in Basra," said Karen McLuskie, a British spokeswoman. "We are raising our concerns with the Iraqi authorities at the highest level.

"The Badr Organization, one of the most powerful militias in southern Iraq and blamed for many of the assassinations, denied any role in the killings. The head of the group in Basra, Ghanim Mayahi, said his organization was only providing "support and assistance" to the police through lightly armed militiamen. "There is no law, there is no order, and the police are scared of the tribes. Badr is not afraid, and it can face those threats."

In the north, Kurdish officials acknowledged that terrorism suspects from across the region have been taken to several Kurdish-run detention facilities, but they said the practice was initiated by the Iraqi government with the blessing of the U.S. military. "It's a question of space; they have no place to put them and here it is safe," said Karim Sinjari, the minister of interior for the Kurdistan Regional Government and a senior official in the Kurdistan Democratic Party.

In June, however, U.S. officials denied any role and called for an end to the "extra-judicial detentions." A State Department memo at the time warned that abductions in the contested northern city of Kirkuk had "greatly exacerbated tensions along purely ethnic lines" and threatened U.S. standing.

In both northern and southern Iraq, the parties and their militias defend their tactics as a way of ensuring security in an increasingly lawless atmosphere. In part, they say, their power reflects their success in January's national and local elections, in which the Kurdistan Democratic Party and its counterpart, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, and the Shiite-led Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and other Islamic parties won overwhelmingly in their respective regions.

But critics charge that they are wresting control over security forces to claim de facto territory and authority, effectively partitioning Iraq even as representatives in Baghdad struggle to negotiate a permanent constitution. "We have a feeling that our Islamic brothers want power, regardless of the law and regardless of the state," said Rahi Muhajir, who leads the Communist Party in Nasiriyah, 130 miles north of Basra. "They want authority and they want to stay permanently."

"Their Own Justice'

In the streets of Basra, a dreary, dun-hued port of 1.5 million people on the banks of the Shatt al Arab, the local police force of 13,600 has become as much an instrument of fear as security. Mohammed Musabah, the governor of Basra, acknowledged that the police were infiltrated by religious parties, the most powerful of which is the Supreme Council. His police chief, Hassan Sawadi, went further. He told a British newspaper, the Guardian, that he had lost control over three-quarters of his police force and that militiamen inside its ranks were using their posts to assassinate opponents. Soon after, Musabah said, the Interior Ministry ordered Sawadi not to speak again publicly

Since May, political leaders estimate that as many as 65 assassinations have occurred in Basra. Among them were a lieutenant colonel in the Defense Ministry, a Baath Party-era police officer, a merchant with ties to Hussein's government, two university professors and a municipal official who had tried to combat corruption. An American journalist was also recently killed, but the circumstances are unclear.

Musabah, whose own Islamic party, Fadhila, is believed to have growing influence inside the police force, said he has imposed new orders to try to track police vehicles involved in killings: Vehicles must bear numbers in large digits on the side, and tinted glass was banned. He tried to disband the two most notorious groups -- police intelligence and internal affairs -- although lower-ranking officers said they still operate as shadow forces at the direction of the Badr Organization, the Supreme Council's military arm.

Many residents of Basra say power remains in the hands of those with guns. They say the political parties -- the Supreme Council and the Fadhila party in particular -- realize that exerting power over the police is the surest way to secure influence and battle their rivals.

"The parties exercise their power through the security forces to impose their political views," said Jamal Khazaal, the leader of the Sunni-led Iraqi Islamic Party in Basra, who carries a pistol and travels with an armed escort. "The police chief can no longer control his own force. It's no longer a secret."


End 08-24-2005


08-27-2005

http://www.why-war.com/news/2004/03/10/thenewpe.html

Lt  Col Karen Kwiatkowski says-

In July of last year, after just over 20 years of service, I retired as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force. I had served as a communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, as a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs. I had completed Air Command and Staff College and Navy War College seminar programs, two master's degrees, and everything but my Ph.D. dissertation in world politics at Catholic University. I regarded my military vocation as interesting, rewarding and apolitical. My career started in 1978 with the smooth seduction of a full four-year ROTC scholarship. It ended with 10 months of duty in a strange new country, observing up close and personal a process of decision making for war not sanctioned by the Constitution we had all sworn to uphold...

In the spring of 2002, I was a cynical but willing staff officer, almost two years into my three-year tour at the office of the secretary of defense, undersecretary for policy, sub-Saharan Africa. In April, a call for volunteers went out for the Near East South Asia directorate (NESA). None materialized. By May, the call transmogrified into a posthaste demand for any staff officer, and I was "volunteered" to enter what would be a well-appointed den of iniquity...

From May 2002 until February 2003, I observed firsthand the formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans and watched the latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. This seizure of the reins of U.S. Middle East policy was directly visible to many of us working in the Near East South Asia policy office, and yet there seemed to be little any of us could do about it.

I saw a narrow and deeply flawed policy favored by some executive appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate and pressurize the traditional relationship between policymakers in the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies.

I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP usurp measured and carefully considered assessments, and through suppression and distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact falsehoods to both Congress and the Executive Office of the President...

I learned that there was indeed a preferred ideology for NESA. My first day in the office, a GS-15 career civil servant rather unhappily advised me that if I wanted to be successful here, I'd better remember not to say anything positive about the Palestinians. This belied official U.S. policy of serving as an honest broker for resolution of Israeli and Palestinian security concerns. At that time, there was a great deal of talk about Bush's possible support for a Palestinian state. That the Pentagon could have implemented and, worse, was implementing its own foreign policy had not yet occurred to me...

After August 2002, the Office of Special Plans established its own rhythm and cadence separate from the non-politically minded professionals covering the rest of the region. While often accused of creating intelligence, I saw only two apparent products of this office: war planning guidance for Rumsfeld, presumably impacting Central Command, and talking points on Iraq, WMD and terrorism. These internal talking points seemed to be a mélange crafted from obvious past observation and intelligence bits and pieces of dubious origin. They were propagandistic in style, and all desk officers were ordered to use them verbatim in the preparation of any material prepared for higher-ups and people outside the Pentagon. The talking points included statements about Saddam Hussein's proclivity for using chemical weapons against his own citizens and neighbors, his existing relations with terrorists based on a member of al-Qaida reportedly receiving medical care in Baghdad, his widely publicized aid to the Palestinians, and general indications of an aggressive viability in Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program and his ongoing efforts to use them against his neighbors or give them to al-Qaida style groups. The talking points said he was threatening his neighbors and was a serious threat to the U.S., too...

Staff officers would always request OSP's most current Iraq, WMD and terrorism talking points. On occasion, these weren't available in an approved form and awaited Shulsky's approval. The talking points were a series of bulleted statements, written persuasively and in a convincing way, and superficially they seemed reasonable and rational. Saddam Hussein had gassed his neighbors, abused his people, and was continuing in that mode, becoming an imminently dangerous threat to his neighbors and to us -- except that none of his neighbors or Israel felt this was the case. Saddam Hussein had harbored al-Qaida operatives and offered and probably provided them with training facilities -- without mentioning that the suspected facilities were in the U.S./Kurdish-controlled part of Iraq. Saddam Hussein was pursuing and had WMD of the type that could be used by him, in conjunction with al-Qaida and other terrorists, to attack and damage American interests, Americans and America -- except the intelligence didn't really say that. Saddam Hussein had not been seriously weakened by war and sanctions and weekly bombings over the past 12 years, and in fact was plotting to hurt America and support anti-American activities, in part through his carrying on with terrorists -- although here the intelligence said the opposite. His support for the Palestinians and Arafat proved his terrorist connections, and basically, the time to act was now. This was the gist of the talking points, and it remained on message throughout the time I watched the points evolve.

We are neither in support of nor opposed to policy.  Neither are we questioning anyone's motives. We are just reporting what happened.  Policy carried out can become a precedent for future policy.

End 08-27-2005


08-28-2005

From the website we read how the purported ringleader of the 9-11 attacks was identified as early as February of 2000 as a potential al-Qaeda terrorist-  (you can search the internet for Capt Scott Philpott, USN, Naval Academy Class of 1983, and read plenty of articles about this topic.  Alternatively, search for Able Danger.)

http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/attack/89849.php

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon has been unable to validate claims that a secret intelligence unit identified Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta as a terrorist more than a year before the attacks, a Defense Department spokesman said Monday.

Larry Di Rita said that some research into the matter continues, but thus far there has been no evidence that the intelligence unit, called "Able Danger," came up with information as specific as an officer associated with the program has asserted.
 
"What we found are mostly general references to terrorist cells," Di Rita said, without providing detail.
 
That officer, Army Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, said Able Danger identified Atta and three other future Sept. 11 hijackers as terrorists in 2000. But Shaffer said military lawyers stopped the unit from sharing the information with the FBI out of concerns about the legality of gathering and sharing information on people in the United States.
 
Shaffer's assertions have been publicized by Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees.
 
Di Rita said Pentagon researchers have found no evidence that Able Danger had Atta's name. He said he was unsure whether the unit came up with the identities of the other three hijackers but then said that none of Shaffer's specific claims had been validated.
 
Shaffer himself has not provided any documentary proof, Di Rita said, and he said Shaffer has presented his information as second-hand.
 
Shaffer's attorney, Mark Zaid, responded that Shaffer's assertions will be proven.
 
"Additional Able Danger team members are coming forward to specifically validate and support Mr. Shaffer's account that several of the 9/11 hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, were identified through their efforts prior to the terrorist attack," Zaid said.
 
On Monday, Navy Capt. Scott Philpott told the Fox News Channel that he had also told the Sept. 11 commission about Atta and Able Danger. In a statement sent to Fox, Philpott wrote: "My story has remained consistent. Atta was identified by Able Danger in early 2000."
 
Zaid said the Pentagon is looking for documents in the wrong places and talking to the wrong people.
 
Last week, he said Shaffer has no documentation related to Able Danger because his security clearance was suspended in March 2004 for "petty and frivolous" reasons such as a dispute over mileage reimbursement. 

Comment-  Look for this scenario to be used to further loosen the restrictions on concerns about the legality of gathering and sharing information on people in the United States.  That is why these officers (who are just doing their duty) have been encouraged (betcha) to step forward.  The people and the congress can now demand more invasive legal capabilities within the intelligence community.  If you have not noticed, there has been a struggle going on between the CIA and the Pentagon intelligence department (newly formed under Rumsfield, who was dissatisfied with what he was getting from CIA.)   Note: The primary motivational factor for starting this website was the world changing impact of 9-11 and its aftermath.  Post 9-11 history has shown itself to be leading toward the characteristics of the Book of Revelation.  One thing is certain- there is a great deal going on behind the scenes within the intelligence community about which we know nothing.  This circumstance is just the tip of the iceberg.

08-28-2005


11-28-2005

from the website-
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8164
we read-

As I have said on many occasions, the process by which we were lied to and lured into the Iraqi quagmire resembles, in all its essentials, a classic disinformation campaign such as would be run by a foreign intelligence operation. The usurpation of authority in the national security bureaucracy, the corruption of the intelligence-gathering process – including the introduction of forged documents – and the deployment of an extensive network both inside and outside of government, all point to a large-scale covert action designed to drag us into war. It wouldn't be the first time a foreign intelligence agency played a key role in getting us into a foreign war, and – as long as the Empire lasts – it won't be the last.

End 11-28-2005


12-01-2005

At one point the President made the statement that the terrorists are making their stand in Iraq.
see
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2005/07/17/study_cites_seeds_of_terror_in_iraq?mode=PF
''Some may disagree with my decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power, but all of us can agree that the world's terrorists have now made Iraq a central front in the war on terror," Bush said in a radio address last month.

As the article points out,
Bush has cited foreign fighters as a reason for continued US military operations in Iraq. His argument, repeated often, is that ''the world's terrorists" have chosen to make their stand in Iraq.

Now, in a speech the President has said
http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20051130-123345-7097r
The new strategy contained no surprises but a lot of unanswered questions. Bush, as expected, ruled out any total U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. He defined America's long-term goal in the California-sized nation of 25 million people with one of the largest oil reserves in the world as establishing the country as "peaceful, united, stable, and secure, well integrated into the international community, and a full partner in the global war on terrorism."

This begs the question, if we defeat the terrorists in Iraq and Iraq becomes a full partner in the global war on terrorism, then, does this not say that the policy clearly calls for a continuation [post Iraq] of the war on terrorism?  Well, this can only mean that "victory" in Iraq over "terrorism" means nothing more than a beginning (since more wars are anticipated).  Of course, a student of the Bible will not be surprised at the fact that wars are in the future.  We just did not know how this would occur.  Perhaps we do now.

In a recent op-ed piece entitled "Who Is Lying in Iraq?", Cal Thomas makes a statement that is so representative of the attitudes of many people who support US policy on the War on Terror,

"peace is a byproduct of defeating evil.

Friends, think of what he has said.  We must rid the world of "evil" people in order to have peace.  Surely this has horrific connotations.  By the time all the sinners are defeated, no one will be left. 

Who is going to define "evil?"  Will the definition not eventually expand to include anyone opposed to the "World Order", whatever that turns out to be?
 
To get a clearer picture of how this might unfold, see a recent speech before the Naval War College by General Abizaid ...

If you look at the geography (of Al Qaida) there is no place to put a  military solution. They are networked and they are all over the world

[Translation - they are potentially everyone and they are no one.]

They are a virtual organization connected by the internet.  They use it to proselytize, recruit, raise money, educate and organize.

[This could just as easily be the Southern Baptist Convention and one day it will be.]

They have many  pieces that we must focus on: the propaganda battle in the media, safe houses, front companies, sympathetic members of legitimate governments,  human capital, fighters and leaders, technical expertise, weapons suppliers, ideologically sympathetic non-government organizations (charities),  financiers, smugglers, and facilitators.  

[This is an exhaustive list.  To control "Al Qaida" we are going to have to control all
charities, legitimate governments, financiers, facilitators, media, front companies, human capital [aka people] etc.  If you watch television, virtually all news commentary is for the purpose of stirring us to action against bogeymen of every persuasion. This is not limited to Al Qaida but includes all the heinous crimes and their coverage.  The coverage is about creating animosity among the people toward "evil."]

The hobgoblin "Al Qaida" is the best bogeyman ever invented.  "It" can not even talk back.  "It" has no representation in the UN.  "It" has no president.  "It" has no geography, no headquarters.  There is no place to put a military solution on "it."  [Does that include Iraq?]  The only time "it" speaks is when a video mysteriously appears  saying-  I speak for "it" and "it' believes bla, bla, bla...  [thus "proving" the dark sentences concerning "Al Qaida"].  "It" can mysteriously show up in the next country the powers-that-be need to conquer.

Hard to argue with the video quoting the non-existing, unknowable "virtual organization connected by the internet".  One of these videos appeared to influence the recent presidential election [the week before the election, hehe] and people actually took this seriously.  By the time "evil" is defeated the terrible choices revealed in the Bible will be a reality.

End 12-01-2005


01-15-2006

from the webpage-
http://www.prisonplanet.com/022904degrand.html
We read how the enemies of the country plan to overthrow the United States as "blowback" from the 9-11 conspiracy.  Since there are so many websites devoted to conspiracy theories (especially those supposedly perpetrated by the United States), I make this observation - remember, an intelligence operation can be
against the United States White House instead of by the United States White House.  So, when you try to oppose the "9-11 conspiracy", you actually make the "blowback conspiracy" successful.  That is why there are so many conspiracy websites.  Most conspiracy websites are actually the blowback-conspiracy itself and many of those "sounding the alarm" are the enemies of the nation.

DGP: Yes, there are. And from this, Alex, and I bring this out very clearly in book 3, the only way we can stop it is with the classic counter-coup d'etat where the military steps in. And under the aegis of the military itself, disengaging or disemboweling the civilian hierarchy and taking over and re-running or re-organizing the federal government.

AJ: Now the problem is they've got so many CFR minions in the Pentagon. We know that Clinton had some officers terminated and, in their office, shot multiple times and the rest of it. We know that that happened but the question is how many of the high level officers are on the globalist team?

DGP: I can only say several of the highest level are members now of the Council on Foreign Relations. The important thing to consider is how many of them are sincere in their beliefs as enunciated by the CFR. I believe there are several sleepers and I believe I know some of them personally who are three and four-star generals. They are members of the CFR but "their heart belongs to Jesus," if I can use that expression because they are true Semper Fidelity people. Some of them happen to be Marines. And I'm counting on them to do the right thing. And I bring this out in book 3.

So, if and when we see the military take the country back from the CFR bogeyman, we will know the fix is in.  Notice that they are hoping that those whose "heart belongs to Jesus" will conduct a counter coup d'etat.  This plays into the hands of the ultimate purpose of the Clash of Civilizations, blame for and elimination of the fundamentalists. They want the "heart-belongs-to-Jesus" boys to overthrow their own government.  In case you forgot, Operation Iraqi Freedom was initially called Operation Infinite Justice.  Get it?

End 01-15-2006


05-20-2006 - 05-21-2006
In spite of what may be good intentions by present leaders in their desire to win the GWOT, what will happen to the constitution when the Global War on Terror proceeds under other leadership?  Will the executive branch of government seize power?

Look at this quote-
Finally, the (a) Senate Committee on Intelligence  of the (b) Republican Party took a really sensational step (c) March 2007. In a carefully drafted document it told the (d) Speaker of the House that, although he was formally responsible for (e) the United States'  war policy, he must obey the orders of the (f) Chief Executive;

Substitute the actual phrase from the original quote-
(a) Reichstag group
(b) Centre Party
(c) October 16, 1916
(d) Reich Chancellor
(e) Germany's
(f) Supreme Command

The rest of the quote is here-
and that whatever the decree issued by them, the Reichstag was prepared to support it. The significance of this declaration "extended far beyond the immediate dispute concerning unrestricted submarine warfare [substitute war-on-terror, wire tapping, Patriot Act, Homeland Security, etc]; it was, in fact, the first formal recognition of the dictatorship of the German Army leaders, not only in the military, but also in political affairs, and the subordination of the Reich's Government and the Reichstag to that dictatorship."

(B. Menne, The Case of Dr. Bruening.)  found here- http://www.geocities.com/visplace/vatican10.htm
The fears of Americans are being preyed upon to bring us closer to such an eventuality.  In our case, it might not be the dictatorship by the military, but, by some increased executive element.  The historical discussion (the role of the Vatican in Germany, and elsewhere, during the 20th century) in the link above is interesting in and of itself.

In general, our country is under attack on several fronts:
(a) massive Federal debt approaching $8,400,000,000,000 (50% foreign owned)
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
(b) $5,000,000,000+ per week to fight a war in Iraq and Afghanistan (per Congressman Ron Paul)
(total cost todate to occupy Iraq and Aghanistan = $300,000,000,000)
(d) massive and unchecked immigration of a poor population from our Southern border
(e) a never ending strategy of war and Middle-eastern military bases in perpetuity
(f) a debt inspired (and vulnerable) economy
(g) an entitlement minded society with already booked and increasing future liabilities with a gutless Congress refusing to deal with the problem
(h) a deliberate? strategy to threaten the Protestant heritage of America
(i) the globalization plan to get rid of the middle class, via the use of debt and global trade
(j) the plan to merge the US, Canada, Mexico into one NAFTA-like country http://www.manews.org/0805elitesmerg.html
(l) the lies of politicians regarding the "benefits" of the global economy
(m) the ever increasing encroachment against the constitution to save us from "terrorism" and other bogeyman
(n) the increasingly militarized attitude of our society
(o) the 2005 trade deficit of $700,000,000,000


One recalls the words of Malachi Martin, now deceased,
"The other two major contenders in the millennium endgame will be ELIMINATED "   (* emphasis added).  (p. 657)
The fearful thing is that one (the Soviets) of these contenders is already eliminated.  The greatest tool used to eliminate the Soviets?  Financial ruin.  Could the United States be next?  Do a search on inflation in the Soviet Union.
For perspective, read-
http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vatican_in_world_politics_introduction.html

While all the above geopolitical destruction of the United States proceeds unabated, the focused public debate is family values, abortion, birth control, women in the priesthood, and the weirdo fundamentalist abduction du jour.

Let's wildly speculate momentarily, even if only as a point of reference. Witness Malachi Martin's cover quote-
"untold story behind the Vatican's role in today's winner-take-all race against time to establish, maintain, and control the first one-world government. "  (cover)

Suppose the White House is in a proxy war with the Vatican who has an intelligence arm (Jesuit?) coopting some Muslim terrorism.  Sounds ridiculous, but, use this assumption as a method of thinking of some of the operational situations.  If that were the case, would not every attempt by the United States to create "democracy" in the Middle East [read US hegemony by the Vatican] be offset by a convenient "insurgency?"  Could not every foray into "peace" that did not meet all the objectives of the Vatican be "interrupted" by sectarian violence.  The real question is not whether this wild speculation is true, but whether Malachi Martin was correct.  If he was correct, there has to be many, not some, mechanisms for the following to be true [regardless of the verity of the above speculation]-

"if tomorrow or next week, by a sudden miracle, a one-world government were established, the Church would not have to undergo any essential structural change in order to retain its DOMINANT position and to FURTHER its GLOBAL aims."   (* emphasis added) (p. 143)

Why is there so much more readily available information regarding Vatican duplicity on the internet?  Is it possible that elements within the United States and elements within the Vatican have a "partnership" designed to raise the ire of conservative Protestant fundamentalists and conservative Muslims (both of whom are viewed as the obstacle to world order - Muslims opposing the emergence of the US presence in the Middle East and Protestants opposing the primacy of the Vatican and "causing" Bush to invade Iraq)?  Once their ire is raised, outrageous action can be induced (or staged).  Eliminating the outrageous action becomes the modus vivendi of the world order (aka Book of Revelation).  Whether or not the above scenario is an exact depiction of the catalyzer, the resultant volatile chemistry will be as depicted.  It is a sad fact of history that both the Muslims and now the conservative "Christians" are willing participants in their own destruction.  All you Southern Baptist [I'll pick on you since I have been in your Sunday schools] flag waving patriots demanding the defeat of Islam are demanding your own demise.  Be sure of your salvation and stop falling for all the propaganda lest you and your lost neighbor be spewed into the tribulation together.

[For those of you having trouble with this, let me spell it out for you - Bush is a victim
, just like the rest of the unsuspecting world, of a geopolitical maneuver by some group(s) (which includes blame for a "conspiracy").  This commentary is not about politics; it is about the conditions preceding the Second Coming of The Lord Jesus Christ.  If you want to play politics (i.e., defend Republicans, accuse Democrats or vice versa) then go ahead and hang around and get in line for the mark of the beast.  The alternative to playing politics is the sovereignty of THE ALMIGHTY GOD.  I am going with the later and staying out of the line for the mark of the beast.   The point here is that there is NO MAN-MADE solution to what is about to beset the world, especially when you consider the enormous power of those behind the already developed scenario.  If you want to waste your time saying that things will continue as they have been, you are whistling past the grave yard.  After this plays out, there will be no more America as we know it.]

Many church goers are totally deceived, yes, church goers, not the unchurched-
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, and saying where is the promise of His coming?
for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. - 2 Pet 3:3-4
They do not believe He is coming and they DO believe they must save the world for "Christianity".  At a recent Bible prophecy conference, 4000 people http://www.omegaletter.com/articles.asp?ArticleID=5767, none raised their hand when asked if their church taught that Jesus is coming.  In fact, according to the author, the apathy factor has grown since 9-11.  That is amazing to me.  9-11 is the primary reason I started this website!  It was a sure sign of a GIGANTIC GEOPOLITICAL EVENT.
If you try to talk endtimes with these church folk, they say you can not know He is coming.  But, the Bible says you WILL know, if you are His, of the general time of His coming.

But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a  thief. Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.   -- 1 Thessalonians 5:4-6  End 05-20-2006  - 05-21-2006


02-01-2007

One of the biggest threats to peace is reportedly Iran.  One of the main reasons Iran is reported to be a threat is outrageous statements attributed to the leader Ahmadinejad.   A friend of mine, Rob, and I have actually discussed whether or not Ahmadinejad is a possible "plant" of some kind (since most things he says in public seem to harm his own country).

Today, I found this interview-
http://larouchepub.com/other/interviews/2007/3401_atrianfar.html

Mohammad Atrianfar is a political activist and close aide to former Iranian President Hashemi Rafsanjani. He is the founder of three newspapers, Hamshahri, Kargozaran, and Sharq (the latter, recently closed). He was interviewed by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach in his Tehran office on Dec. 7, and spoke through an interpreter. 

Atrianfar: There are various views of the new situation of Iran, which can be divided into three categories. Some here are very concerned about a situation where the whole political structure of the region may be compromised; some think nothing will happen; and some believe the situation will get worse. I'm inclined to the third viewpoint. The two viewpoints at opposite extremes belong to the radicals in Iran. Those who believe nothing will happen mainly belong to what are often called the hardliners in the right-wing camp. Mr. Ahmadinejad represents this viewpoint. This viewpoint can also be seen in the people affiliated with the Basij [see below], or others affiliated with the right-wing faction. Such a viewpoint is not far-fetched on the part of military people, because the military always talk tough; but politicians are expected to behave differently. So, we don't endorse these views of Mr. AhmadinejadOf course, his views are not limited to Iran. They sometimes also threaten other countries—you can understand this in the way he wrote a letter to President Bush and in his speeches at the United Nations, from his position on the Palestinians, Israel, etc. This suggests these people think that Iran is the center of the universe and can bring about any change they want. This is also false and cannot be accepted...

There is a strong, serious challenge between the first and the third groups. The hardliners now in power are just a minority of 20%, against a large majority of 60-70% who are out of power. This large majority is like the body, and the head—the 20%—now controls everything. This is what the current picture of Iran is...

What political activists criticize is that this military structure was heavily involved in the [2005] elections. This was opposed by Mr. Rafsanjani and by Mr. Karroubi, and all reformist parties protested. The Supreme leader [Ayatollah Khamenei] was expected to intervene, to organize a fact-finding team to look into the Basij involvement. From three to four months prior to the elections, some 400 opinion polls, scientific surveys, were conducted, locally, regionally, and nationally. None indicated a win by Mr. Ahmadinejad. What happened? Is it possible that an unidentified, unknown person could win? Or is it a miracle, though we say the era of the Prophets is over? Or, there must be irregularity, vote rigging.

Besides, the performance of Ahmadinejad in the first year, has been such that he has alienated many of his wise supporters, even many people in his government, his cabinet. So, Ahmadinejad was not democratically elected, although there was the appearance of a democratic process. It was influenced by forces from the outside. . . .

So, since Iran is now reportedly a major source of the problems in Iraq (and no longer the bogeyman "al-Qaeda", good grief) and all the "terrorism" problems are chiefly coming from Iran and Iran is the major problem with the Hizbollah, etc, etc; then, who are the presumably "terrorist" forces from the outside who got Amhadinejad elected?  (My answer- the same people who manipulated Bush to invade Iraq).  If you believe defeating the "enemy" in Iran is going to save the planet, think again.

Sorry, I just do not believe everything I see on TV, you know, the one that tells you what you should think about and what you should think about it.  All this does not add up properly.  My point is simple - the world is being lead to the slaughter through dark sentences.  My advice - do not be around to see this come to fruition.

End 02-01-2007


 08-22-2011

There is more happening than the total collapse of the US dollar and the US economy.
If you want to know how much the dollar is dropping, watch the price of gold.
Gold goes up because the dollar is worth less.  Gold is screaming a loud message now.

Now for the news of the day-

http://www.sovereignman.com/expat/another-shocking-blatant-coverup-attempt?a_aid=CRX

Another shocking, blatant coverup attempt

The [Mexican] war was also the first time (of many, many more to come) that the US government outright lied as a pretext to declare war. The official story spun by President James Polk at the time was that Mexican forces invaded the United States, unprovoked, and ‘shed American blood on American soil.’

This account has been rejected by historians, as well as by Grant in his memoirs:

“We were sent to provoke a fight, but it was essential that Mexico should commence it. It was very doubtful whether Congress would declare war; but if Mexico should attack our troops, the Executive could… prosecute the contest with vigor. Once initiated there were but few public men who would have the courage to oppose it.”

Grant later writes, “Experience proves that the man who obstructs a war in which his nation is engaged, no matter whether right or wrong, occupies no enviable place in life or history.”

Not much has changed. The next 165 years of warfare in the United States are filled with lies, deceit, false flag operations, imperialistic conquest, and state-sponsored media propaganda. Those who dared question the official stories were vilified and dismissed as unpatriotic conspiracy theorists.

The most recent example was the capture and death of Osama bin Ladin in May 2011 by the famed SEAL Team Six.

There are so many questions, so many holes in the official story– the conspicuous location in a small town surrounded by Pakistani military, the handling of the body in accordance with a Muslim tradition that doesn’t exist, the refusal to provide any real evidence to verify the claim, etc.

US mainstream media largely gave Obama a pass on these questions and focused instead on the nationwide euphoria over the news.

Now the United States Congress is trying to lock down, once and for all, any further hint of question about the event with a new bill, HR 2819. The bill prohibits any “officer or employee of the Federal Government from providing information about the mission to kill Osama bin Laden to any person outside the Federal Government…”

This essentially silences anyone who might be able to shed some light on the event.

The gag order would remain in effect until the CIA and Defense Department conduct their own ‘investigations’ and brief Congress; in other words, several years at least.  [At least until the 3rd Tues in November 12 - smile]

It’s ironic that the government often relies on an insipidly weak logic when it erodes the privacy of its citizens. If you don’t like how USA PATRIOT Act provisions allow then to tap your telephone or check out your rental history, they say, “Hey, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear!”

Obviously the same reasoning doesn’t apply to them… and it’s another example of the tragic farce that is modern government.


For those of us who are naive, Bin Laden died of renal failure probably in late 2001. 

The so-called raid on "Bin Laden" happened in a CIA "property" probably in CIA control for years. The cameras showing the operation went off for the last 40 minutes of the "operation."   Therefore, nobody saw the operation, probably including Seal Team Six (because the last steps of the operation were done by the CIA while "Seal Team Six" stood guard on the perimeter.)  Even if "Seal Team Six" participated, they could have seen nothing of "Bin Laden."  

A simple question - why did members of "Seal Team Six" die recently?   This is a serious question.

Obama did not approve the "operation." The "operation" was decided upon and he was TOLD
by the CIA that it was in progress .  Then, Obama goes on 60 Minutes and says "I did this and I did that."

Why was it necessary to keep a dead man alive long enough to kill him?

Why did Zbigniew Brzezinski say there is no such thing as organized iternational Islamic terrorism?

Why did the CIA officer not arrest Bin Laden in the American Hospital in Dubai in the summer of 2001?  Could it be because Bin Laden was a CIA asset?  And, who was the Bin Laden who made video tapes after he was dead and released them for the Presidential election of 2004?

You can compose your own questions from this point.

End 08-22-2011


09-11-2011

It is not deliberate that I am answering this question today.   It just turned out that way.  I received the question this morning and I just noticed that it is the 10 year anniversary of the birth of the TSA and the Patriot Act.  Oops, the Patriot Act was written before 9-11 and readily available for Congressional approval (or do they really approve legislation any more?).   We know they do not read or write legislation, nor can we find out what is in legislation until we approve it... I digress

Letter from Reader

Russell-
When you get time, read this and see if you agree, especially paragraph 4.

http://www.etherzone.com/2008/mako120808.shtml

Paragraph 4-
This adds weight to the widely-held view that the central bankers are responsible for most terrorism, using MI-6, Mossad and the CIA. Dr. Day also said that "war is obsolete" given the danger of nuclear exchange so terrorism would be used instead. This was 1969.

Response for All Readers-

My first reaction is that somebody is out to bring down the bankers.  See this for the potential origin of such a movement.   Truly, Malachi Martin says in his book that the Western Capitalists (would this not include the Central Banks, owned by private banks?) will be eliminated.
Martin refers to the Western Capitalists as the Golden Internationale (in contrast with the Red Internationale the moniker often associated with communism).  As Martin writes on page 657 - "The other two major contenders in the millennium endgame will be ELIMINATED "   (* emphasis added).

My second reaction is that this is the 10th anniversary of the biggest fraud in the history of the United States.  If people believe that 9-11 was perpetrated by 19 Muslims (some of whom were alive after 9-11 because they apparently survived crashing into buildings while flying jets), then these people who believe the 19 Muslims did it are conspiracy theorists that believe the 9-11 Commission's Official Conspiracy Theory.  By definition, what is presented in the official account is a conspiracy.

On the morning of 9-11, as I sat in the dentist chair, the dental assistance told me around 9:15 what had happened.  At that moment, I said to myself "they have done it."   I said this on 9-11-2001 because of the years of study I had done leading up to the event.  They are the intelligence community, the subject of many years study for me.  In a 1993 manuscript I authored it says "the people will demand that the government control their lives on account of terrorism."

What most people do not understand is that there are so many "contractors" involved in the military and intelligence community that one can hardly call these contractors citizen "soldiers."   They are mercenaries who have controllers.  These "controllers" can be anyone with any agenda.   And there are MANY levels above the controllers.  Good luck identifying who the top layer is.    If we can run the government WITHOUT having had a budget for YEARS, we certainly can "run" the intelligence community without any Congressional/Governmental oversight.  Congress is nothing but a facade to make the people believe they have a democracy, God forbid we call it a Republic.  Congress is completely controlled by staff ("contractors" if you want to call them that because they took no oath), especially in the writing of legislation and the process by which legislation is considered.

 As an historical example of intelligence at the top, the Vatican for all practical purposes was THE source of information for the CIA during the Cold War. One could say that the Vatican WAS the CIA to some extent.  There is a book documenting how the Vatican Ratlines enabled WWII Nazis to enter the CIA post WWII.  Later, 1958-1963, two socialist and/or  "red" Popes were elected in the Vatican Curia by the KGB, the Vatican turned pro-Soviet and kicked the "pestilential rats" (the CIA) out of the Vatican [the Pope who kicked out the CIA had previously, before he became Pope, himself been kicked out of the Vatican by the CIA],
a president who fired the director of the CIA and threatened to break "the CIA into a thousand pieces" and threatened to print US Treasury Notes (instead of Federal Reserve Notes) was murdered, and a Pope was murdered so that a John Paul II could be elected by the CIA.   The President was JFK and the man he fired, Allen Dulles, sat on the Warren Commission.

Do you believe these facts are completey unrelated to 9-11?  If you believe they are unrelated it is because you are looking at the ocean through a straw.  This straw is provided to you by the media.  I NEVER watch the media any more because the definition of news (as presented) is a sick joke.  For me, this has been true for at least 35 years.

There is PLENTY of evidence to support an alternative conspiracy theory.  The problem is that most people, because of their emotional allegiance and dependence on certain worldviews vis-a-vis the United States, can not psychologically permit themselves to even look at the facts.  If we took one hour to examine the facts and had an open mind, our worldview would be changed forever.  This is an emotional risk we can not take because  this risk leads to a certain mental loss of those things we hold dear.   This brings us to the ultimate question - on what does our hope and faith rest?

I could write a dissertation the size of this website about 9-11.  I will refrain from doing so because if you are a seeker you will discover the truth in any case.  If you are not a seeker, you will never find the truth.

Furthermore, I delve into this topic not because I believe the process of dictatorship, which is prophesied in the Bible, can be stopped; but, because the 9-11 Conspiracy and our refusal to accept the truth of it is exactly how the world government will come to pass.  By the way, if we try to stop the process, it will happen faster.  That is why some want us to take to the street.

If you are a seeker- See the books by David Ray Griffin.  http://davidraygriffin.com/

Warning, the David Ray Griffin site may become, if not already, coopted.  Today is the first day I went to the site.
I read none of it.  However, I have read 5 of the books by Griffin.  The site and movement seems to be evolving into a religious kingdom movement.  The likely outcome is that the 9-11 truth movement will be denigrated as a whipping boy comparable to the accusations against the Tea Party (when they tried to reduce spending) and thus "caused" the financial crisis.  In a similar manner the 9-11 truth movement will become a generic "religious" target.

My friend, I have said over and over and over on this website- stay out of the streets, live peacably, obey the laws, and wait on the LORD because there is NOTHING you can do to stop the WILL of GOD.  His will includes the Coming of the Antichrist and the mark without which you can neither buy nor sell.   That is, all those not taken in the Rapture will come under the total control of the government.

The ONLY thing that matters is Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior?

Do not become a Kingdom Maker.

The purpose of this website is to make sure you realize you have NO earthly choices left, the Bible is true, its prophecies are coming to pass quickly, and Jesus Christ is your only option.  Choose this day whom ye will serve.

End 09-11-2011


11-06-2011

We have discussed before that the War on Terror (aka Clash of Civilizations) has ulterior motives.

Here we read an account of one who was taken prisoner and placed into a camp for "al-Qaeda" terrorists.
For educational purposes, read the whole article.  It will give you a new perspective.

http://www.thedailybell.com/2859/Anthony-Wile-Lost-in-a-Yemen-Jail-A-DB-Staffer-Speaks-About-His-Long-Strange-Trip-and-the-Secret-Gulag-America-Has-Built-in-the-Middle-East-and-Africa

Staffer: Well ... what are the chances that the son of the Bush family's main business contact in Saudi Arabia – a family that is worth billions – suddenly becomes a fanatical, fundamentalist Muslim and then supposedly blows up the World Trade Towers? Pretty coincidental, I'd say. And there are plenty of stories of bin Laden traveling to the US in the 1990s under the name of Tim Osman to recruit for his cause, a cause apparently sponsored by the CIA. After all, the CIA seemingly was responsible for aggregating the original so-called al Qaeda in the 1980s when they were recruiting young radicals to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. They collected a data base that they called the base – as in al Qaeda. It was a "list." The CIA seems obviously involved in the inception of al Qaeda, though they deny it strenuously.

Staffer: Well, the alternative is a kind of war. In Abyan Province in the South of Yemen, the Americans are shelling certain urban areas on a daily basis – places where rebellious tribesmen and al Qaeda are said to be. They are sending in Saudi and American planes as well, and at night they are apparently sending in SEALS with night-fighting equipment. This is a significant illegal action. America apparently has numerous troops on the ground on a nightly basis – and yet you read nothing about this is the mainstream press. America is very far gone now, from a truth-telling standpoint. Almost everything reported in the mainstream press in America and even the West is a lie of some sort, or at least a fudge. The purpose is always the same – to promote world government. In fact, the more the Internet tells the truth, the more the mainstream press does not. It's as if the elite banking families that run the world are trying to counteract the truth with lies and distortions.

Daily Bell: Why would they do such a thing?

Staffer: Obviously to take away more freedoms in the West. The target on this mostly phony war on terror, in my view, is the West and the middle class. The elites have been after middle class freedoms for over a century. With the war on terror, they have has a reason to escalate considerably. The Patriot Act, with all of its reductions in what was left of freedom in the US, was written before 9/11. During its signing they had the military patrolling the corridors of Congress with guns. Congressmen were intimidated. The situation in America and the West has gotten no better since then. The great families want world government and they are willing to remove any freedoms they need to in order to get it.

Daily Bell: So the war on terror has little to do with al Qaeda?

Staffer: In the prison I was in, people told me over and over that America and Yemen were actually producing radicalized young men with their incarceration policies.

Daily Bell: How did that work?

Staffer: I personally met only one man who claimed to be a legitimate member of al Qaeda in a jail that supposedly was chock full of al Qaeda. The rest were young men, mostly, who had the misfortune of holding somewhat fundamentalist, or at least enthusiastic, views about Islam.

Daily Bell: Thought crimes, in other words.

Staffer: Sure. Some examples. A shopkeeper from Kenya who was taken prisoner some six months ago for speaking to someone who held fundamentalist views 17 years before. He was put in an even worse prison than the one I was in. The worst prison in Yemen, where all the hard-core Jihadists are supposedly locked up. He said it consisted of single, individual cells – it was dungeonlike, in other words – and that you were not let out even to go to the bathroom except occasionally. He said the primary entertainment consisted of sitting on a ratty mattress watching your urine pool in front of you. After several months of this, he was moved to the prison where I was. By then he'd developed severe high blood pressure. It was aggravated by the interrogations. He said he was always being dragged in front of Americans from the embassy and that his questioners included one Asian man, apparently from the CIA, who was always shouting at him that he would spend the rest of his life in prison if he didn't reveal information that he knew. The trouble was that he was only a shopkeeper and didn't know anything. His last significant Islamic conversation occurred 17 years ago. He was desperate to get out because he had a business and a family and his business was in ruins after nine months.

Daily Bell: Why didn't they let him go?

Staffer: Well, this is the sad part. The entire political prison system in Yemen is built on the idea that there are many al Qaeda who need to be identified. Thus, the Americans may pay a bounty for such people – of one sort or another – and the Yemeni authorities are glad to oblige by fueling the charade with innocent people.

So, how long, dear friend before the USA is itself subjected to such treatment?

Staffer: Well ... let's look at the realities. The dictators being deposed in the Middle East are all secular. Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, Ben Ali of Tunisia, Muammar Gaddafi of Libya – all of them are non-Islamic types. And what will come about now? Probably the Muslim Brotherhood in one way or another. The Brotherhood is apparently penetrated and to a degree controlled by the CIA. So you have the spectacle of the West actively deposing secularists in order to replace them with controllable Muslim entities. Of course, it won't be portrayed that way in the West. The Muslim Brotherhood will be painted as a radical sect that poses an immediate danger to the West.

End 11-06-2011




What are we to do about this?  Absolutely nothing.  There is nothing you can do but pray.

Only get right with the Lord.
Even this is a matter for the individual conscience.
It is between you and the Lord only.


How Is A Man Saved?




Home Page



Please e-mail us with questions or comments today.   I may be wrong, but, the Bible is never wrong.  


 Jesus-is-the-Way
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" - Jesus Christ
 
John 14:6