Honor Jesus Christ, Glorify
God, Encourage Believers, & Warn All
Est 07-07-2005 Changed
information is offered with the hope that YOU can come to KNOW the Lord
And in the
time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a
king of fierce countenance , and understanding dark sentences,
Daniel 8:25 And
through his policy also he shall cause craft to
prosper in his hand; and he
shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall
also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without
The antichrist causes craft
prosper (Daniel 8:25). Craft
Strong's Concordance is word
# 4820 and means
" fraud, deceit, and
understand dark sentences in Daniel 8:23.
Interestingly enough, the Strong's Concordance
word for dark
sentences is the SAME word, #
2420. They mean " a puzzle;
hence a trick" saying.
The expression comes from the
root word #2330 which means "to
put forth." This
must mean that the eventual
antichrist will purposely use (put
forth) language designed to trick the hearer.
Consequently, since the
same word (2420) is used twice, the " trick" is to give out double meanings in the
sentences. The essence of an intelligence operation is
information (dual information). The antichrist (DURING HIS RISE)
Therefore, he must understand them when used by others. Who are
the others? Daniel 8:23 tells us that when
the transgressors are
come to the full. Notice that there is more than one
(plural) come to the full.
which the Assyrian antichrist understands.
We have shown previously how the policy of a
"war on terror" could fulfill the role of antichrist in confirming
the "covenant" in effect during the coming
tribulation. The antichrist, known as the
Assyrian in the Bible, therefore will have been (and will be)
involved in intelligence operations in the
"war on terror" to establish "democracy."
A few examples of dual meanings (dark sentences)
"peace process" really
translates into "war", and
(for some) "war on terror"
means "war on
Islam" later resulting in "war
West". Moreover, "democracy"
and "freedom" looks too much
like "martial law." By the
Assyrian antichrist rises to power he will, in all likelihood, have
already become well versed in the art of dark sentences.
leaders, like us all
individually, governments and their leaders had better do some serious self examination,
lest they become transgressors
and when their policy is come to the full,
antichrist in a place the Bible has
already identified for us.
Sound far fetched? Consider the Bible verse that falls BETWEEN
the two verses we just discussed.
Daniel 8:24 And his
power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:
and he shall destroy wonderfully,
and shall prosper, and practice, and shall destroy the mighty and the
It is clear that the Assyrian antichrist will have power
GIVEN TO HIM, verse 24. Where does he get this power? The
previous verse (23) says when the
transgressors are come to the full marks the time for the fraud, deceit and
the Assyrian. If we look carefully, the Bible tells us that the Assyrian is going to receive a "crown".
When this crown
is given to the Assyrian, he will also have a military
at his disposal. Can you
think of any place in the world that
already has a military on the ground and where this place desperately
needs a leader to change the direction of its angry peoples, some of
whom can only be coopted by the use of dark
A place where "regime change"
and the doctrine of "preemptive war"
mimics the battlegrounds described in Daniel chapter 11:36-45 (which
ends with a "palace"
in Jerusalem) Which mimics the war campaign of
Revelation chapter 6?
Note on "conspiracy" theories:
Since the antichrist and the transgressors
are going to practice fraud, deceit, and treachery (dark sentences)
not a conspiracy by definition?
Merriam-Webster definition of conspire: to join
in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act. Since the Bible says, God shall send
them strong delusion that they should believe a lie (2 Thess
2:11), then the very nature of the endtimes deception makes it a
conspiracy. An example is Mystery Babylon
the Great. If she is a Mystery,
then, she will be hidden from the people at large. Have
you ever asked yourself this question - How will it happen that the peace and safety
touted by the world will actually become as many as would
not worship the image of the beast should be killed and that they should
kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.
she made all nations drink
of the wine of the wrath
of her fornication? How will
it happen that God will call for a
sword against him throughout all my mountains [kingdoms], saith the Lord
GOD: every man's sword shall be against his brother? How
will the Lord accomplish this except through men? Is the Lord going to
magically cause men to suddenly start killing each other for reasons
the men know not? Or is He going to prepare a
way? See, for example, be thou prepared,
and prepare for thyself (Eze 38:7).
Already, the intelligence effort in Iraq
is increasing, making intelligence the premium asset for future
operations. Quotes are from Janes Intelligence (Copyright Janes
Intelligence Digest, Jul 22, 2005)
the US Army
plans to establish a joint
intelligence centre to aid counter-insurgency efforts and
fledgling Iraqi intelligence services set up in mid-2004 under
then-interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi are largely funded by CIA, which now
maintains in Baghdad the biggest foreign station in its
history, with more than 500 personnel. This eclipses its Saigon station at the
height of the Vietnam War...
have also been persistent
contractors operating in Iraq
outside of military control, are working undercover
similar to those that operated in Vietnam under the CIA's Phoenix
Programme which was charged with assassinating suspected Vietcong
officials. Given such
rumours, it is hardly surprising that these men - mainly ex-soldiers
from the US and Europe who also work as bodyguards, interrogators and
prison staff - have become prime targets for the insurgents.
has long been preached that Russia is Magog and Russia will attack
Israel. Well (even considering the source), is it a legitimate
question to ask 'could it be,
at least indirectly, the results of actions
of the United States, or at least some elements of the intelligence
community connected with the US?' We have already
established that Magog invaders
are partly from the Caucasus regions. Now read portions of this
speech by Vladislav Surkov, Putin's top aid.
what is relevant, but you probably should read it all.)
Imagine that Surkov is a conservative US Congressman, a loyal patriot,
who can not believe what is happening to surrender American sovereignty
to NAFTA, CAFTA, globalism, etc and
who does not want to give up certain liberties for "safety"..
Surkov is speaking to a business forum. The suffering of the
Russian people has been enormous. They lost 10,000,000 people in
WWII, just one example. Stalin was reported to have killed
millions more. They suffered greatly as a result of the "fall"
and the "revolution" of 1992 and the incredible inflation.
system as complex, as our country, can not afford fast and dramatic
changes. Democracy is not our only objective. We care about the Russian
world has to be integrated, but the value of national cultures does
not decrease, it only grows instead. One has to safeguard
There is also the immediate task of fighting terrorism, that threatens
our country’s integrity, and, therefore, threatens
The Caucasus is [problem] number one. Unfortunately, the situation
isn’t getting any better there. It is even getting worse. It looks like
And we’ve got
nothing to boast about there.
we witness definite movement by Finland, Estonia and the EU on
the issue of Finno-Ugrian nations. It has suddenly been discovered that
we [Russia] opress them somehow [does this sound familiar?].
are discriminated against in our
country [does this
sound familiar?]. And regions,
where these Finno-Ugrians constitute a majority of the population, do
hold a strategic amount of our oil reserves. I am not
researcher might as well have "not a fan of conspiracy theories" on his
lapel, chuckle, so he can appear "reasonable". The emperor
has no clothes.] But this
operations [against Russia].
Last week there was
a resolution in PACE about how “we” oppress the Finno-Ugric nations
(the Hants, the Mansi, the Chuvash, the Komi peoples etc). These are
yesterday’s schemes, and they’re evident. And I didn’t even start to
mention all those “orange
activities. It’s common knowledge, that Freedom House is headed by
Woolsey, who used to be the head of the CIA. It
uses the word “kontora”, which means “office” in Russian and used to be
a codename of the KGB in Soviet times]. We also should not forget, that
specific circles in those countries are also pursuing similar tasks. We
have to take this into account in our work...
spite of the integrity of Western economics, the French elite is
considered as French, and the German as German. I think that while the Russian
is still an
aristocracy, till it
understands, maybe not in this generation, that it is, for all that, a
national bourgeoisie, we will have nothing good in our country. We will
dangle in a critical gap.
The sovereignty of
Russia is at stake is what Surkov is saying. So, before we ride
off into the sunset proud of our "overthrowing the evil empire" we had
better give pause for thought as to what is coming
mission" is not a dark sentence,
revolutions" do not kill people.
from the website-
Once again, I am not attempting to
attribute bad motives to our leaders. God put these men in office
and made them think the way they do to fulfill His will. However,
from the link above we can see clearly that the scenario that Seymour
Hersh described as "riding with the bad boys"
going to be part of the Dark Sentences
played out in the covert and military world which will eventually be
adopted by the antichrist himself.
One must consider that the source of this information is Moscow, who is
worried about the presence of US special forces in the southern
Caucasus region and elsewhere. But friends, someone has to be the
worldwide enforcer for the coming world order and we know the
antichrist arises "not by his own
power." Daniel 8:24). Who else is it going to be? I
have no way to verify the accuracy of the following, but, I have seen
similar reports in various places. We know that Dark Sentences
is going to take place because the Bible tells us that it will.
Could this be a description of its inception?
By Chris Floyd
01/21/2005 "Moscow Times" --
More than two years ago, we wrote here of a secret
and goad them into action -- in other
words, committing acts of
murder and destruction. The purpose was two-fold: first,
where they could
and second, to
operating -- attacks which,
in the Pentagon's words,
would put those nations' "sovereignty
It was a plan that
countenanced -- indeed, encouraged -- the deliberate murder of innocent
people and the imposition of U.S. military rule anywhere in the world
that U.S. leaders desired.
[Sounds like the worst
kind of propaganda, but, when the Bible says they
what is it referring? If the United States is "riding with the bad boys" and
calling it "democracy" and "freedom", have you got a better
description than Dark
Sentences? We will reap
what we sow. The principle of preemptive war is a long held
doctrine of the neo-cons, who as it curiously turns out, are a by
product of the left in the 1960s (so says
Congressman Ron Paul's website above) (and we
know where the merger of the left into "conservatism" started) .]
plan is now being activated.
create its own terrorist groups and "death squads." After
establishing their terrorist "credentials" through various atrocities
and crimes, these American-run groups will then be able to
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- just as we noted
here in November 2002. Through a series of secret executive orders,
George W. Bush has given Rumsfeld the authority to turn the entire
world into "a
a top Pentagon
These secret operations will be carried out with virtually no
oversight; in many cases, even
about them. The American
course, will never know what's being done in their name.
covert units -- including the Pentagon-funded terrorist groups and hit
squads -- will be operating outside all constraints of law and
morality. "We're going to
be riding with the bad boys," one insider
told Hersh. Another likened it to the palmy days of the Reagan-Bush
years: "Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?
We founded them and we financed them. The objective now is to recruit
locals in any area we want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about
it." Indeed, we reported here last summer that Bush has already
budgeted $500 million to fund local paramilitaries and guerrilla groups
in the most volatile areas of the world, a measure guaranteed to
produce needless bloodshed, destruction and suffering for innocent
people already ravaged by conflict. [An interview with Hersh can be read here-
the "war on terror." Despite some obfuscating rhetoric about
"diplomacy," [Dark Sentences]
new military fronts in the "global free-fire
zone." Any dissenting voices within the government are being ruthlessly
purged. The Pentagon's secret forces are set for operations in at least
10 countries, and Bush insiders "repeatedly" told Hersh that "Iran is
the next strategic target." [Will this provoke an Iranian attack?]
-- led by Rumsfeld, Paul
Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney and their acolytes -- who engineered the
invasion of Iraq. [You can read a history of the so-called
neo-cons, whose advice the president is heeding, on Congressman Ron
Paul's website- http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm ] This group is
determined to "whack Iran," as one
insider put it, and they're not at all discouraged by the debacle in
Iraq; indeed, to them it's a rousing success. Their
-- was the overthrow
This has now
been done. The fact that it has
plunged the Iraqi people into a hell of violence, chaos, terror and
extremism is of no real concern to the clique. Their lofty rhetoric
about "freedom" and "liberation" is meaningless
sham, shuck and jive
for the rubes [Dark
Sentences]. By the admission
of the clique's own publications, they
seek strategic control over the world's energy resources in order to
[Do a search for Project
for the New American Century]. Everything else --
including the security of the American
people, put at increasing risk by the clique's reckless policies -- is
of secondary importance.
forces are already conducting
military reconnaissance inside Iran in preparation for strikes on
alleged nuclear weapons facilities, Hersh reports. The Pentagon is
feverishly updating war plans for a "maximum ground and air invasion of
Iran," incorporating the new staging areas now available in Iraq,
Afghanistan and Pakistan, while employing
against Tehran. MEK was
once given sanctuary by Hussein, who used the group as a brutal
enforcer against Kurd and Shiite insurgents. Now Bush,
"riding with the
bad boys," has embraced the MEK murderers as his own.
ignorance and arrogance, the Bushists will almost certainly strike at
Iran -- despite the fact that even Iranian dissidents support the
effort to make their nation a nuclear power and would join the mullahs
in retaliation. The result will be a conflict far surpassing the horror
and magnitude of the Iraq disaster.
his cohorts are
plunging the world into an abyss, an endless night of murder and terror
-- wholesale, retail, state-sponsored, privatized; of fear and
degradation, servility, chaos, and the perversion of all that's best in
us." Now the night has come. Now the United States stands openly --
even proudly -- for terrorism, torture and the Hitlerian principle of
aggressive war. America has fallen into the pit -- and the hopes of the
world go with it.
from the wesbite-
we read of more confimation concerning the early stages of the
development of the they-shall-kill-one-another
Iraq -- Shiite and Kurdish
operating as part of Iraqi government security forces, have
carried out a wave of abductions,
their control over territory across
Iraq and deepening the country's divide
along ethnic and sectarian lines, according to political leaders,
families of the victims, human rights activists and Iraqi officials.
Iraqi representatives wrangle over the drafting of a constitution in
Baghdad, forces represented by the militias and the Shiite and Kurdish
parties that control them are creating
authority, unaccountable to elected
governments, the activists and officials said. In Basra in the south, dominated
by the Shiites, and Mosul in the north, ruled by the Kurds, as
well as cities and villages around them, many residents say they are
powerless before the growing sway of the militias, which instill a
climate of fear that many see as redolent of the era of former
president Saddam Hussein.
parties and their armed wings are sometimes operating independently,
and other times as part of Iraqi army and police units trained
and equipped by the United States and Britain and controlled by the
central government. Their growing authority has enabled them to seize
territory, confront their perceived enemies and provide patronage to
their followers. Their rise has come because of a power vacuum in
Baghdad and their own success in the January elections.
formation of a government this spring, Basra, Iraq's second-largest
city, has witnessed dozens
of assassinations, claiming members of the former ruling Baath
Party, Sunni political leaders and officials of competing Shiite
parties. Many have been carried out by uniformed men in police
vehicles, according to political leaders and families of the victims,
with some of the bullet-riddled bodies dumped at night in a
trash-strewn parcel known as The Lot. The province's governor said in
an interview that Shiite
militias have penetrated the police force; an Iraqi official
estimated that as many as 90 percent of officers were loyal to
Across northern Iraq, Kurdish
parties have employed a previously undisclosed network of at least five
detention facilities to incarcerate hundreds of Sunni Arabs, Turkmens
and other minorities abducted and secretly transferred from Mosul,
to political leaders and detainees' families.
Nominally under the authority of the U.S.-backed Iraqi army, the
militias have beaten up and threatened government officials and
political leaders deemed to be working against Kurdish interests; one
bloodied official was paraded through a town in a pickup truck,
see any difference between Saddam and the way the Kurds are running
things here," said Nahrain Toma, who heads a human rights organization,
Betnahrain, with offices in northern Iraq and has faced several death
the tactics were eroding what remained of U.S. credibility as the
militias operate under what many Iraqis view as the blessing of
American and British forces. "Nobody
they gave the power to the Kurds and to the Shiites. No one
else has any rights."
the problem," said Majid Sari, an adviser in the Iraqi Defense Ministry
in Basra, who travels with a security detail of 25 handpicked Iraqi
soldiers. "They're taking money from the state, they're taking clothes
from the state, they're taking vehicles from the state, but their
loyalty is to the parties." Whoever disagrees, he said, "the next day
you'll find them dead in the street."
officials, whose authority runs through Basra and parts of southern
Iraq, have called the killings "totally unacceptable."
aware of allegations that men
out serious crimes in Basra," said Karen McLuskie, a
British spokeswoman. "We are raising our concerns with the Iraqi
authorities at the highest level.
Organization, one of the most powerful militias in southern Iraq and
blamed for many of the assassinations, denied any role in the killings.
The head of the group in Basra, Ghanim Mayahi, said his organization
was only providing "support and assistance" to the police through
lightly armed militiamen. "There is no law, there is no order, and the
police are scared of the tribes. Badr is not afraid, and it can face
north, Kurdish officials acknowledged that terrorism suspects from
across the region have been taken to several Kurdish-run detention
facilities, but they said the practice was initiated by the Iraqi
government with the blessing of the U.S. military. "It's a question of
space; they have no place to put them and here it is safe," said Karim
Sinjari, the minister of interior for the Kurdistan Regional Government
and a senior official in the Kurdistan Democratic Party.
however, U.S. officials denied any role and called for an end to the
"extra-judicial detentions." A State Department memo at the time warned
that abductions in the contested northern city of Kirkuk had "greatly exacerbated tensions along
purely ethnic lines" and threatened U.S. standing.
northern and southern Iraq, the parties and their militias defend their
tactics as a way of ensuring security in an increasingly lawless
atmosphere. In part, they say, their power reflects their success in
January's national and local elections, in which the Kurdistan
Democratic Party and its counterpart, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan,
and the Shiite-led Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq
and other Islamic parties won overwhelmingly in their respective
critics charge that they are wresting control over security forces to
claim de facto territory and authority, effectively partitioning Iraq
even as representatives in Baghdad struggle to negotiate a permanent
constitution. "We have a feeling that our Islamic brothers want power,
regardless of the law and regardless of the state," said Rahi Muhajir,
who leads the Communist Party in Nasiriyah, 130 miles north of Basra.
"They want authority and they want to stay permanently."
streets of Basra, a dreary, dun-hued port of 1.5 million people on the
banks of the Shatt al Arab, the local police force of 13,600 has become
as much an instrument of fear as security. Mohammed Musabah, the
governor of Basra, acknowledged that the police were infiltrated by
religious parties, the most powerful of which is the Supreme Council.
His police chief, Hassan Sawadi, went further. He told a British
newspaper, the Guardian, that he had lost control over three-quarters
of his police force and that militiamen inside its ranks were using
their posts to assassinate opponents. Soon after, Musabah said, the
Interior Ministry ordered Sawadi not to speak again publicly
Since May, political leaders
estimate that as many as 65 assassinations have occurred in Basra.
Party-era police officer, a merchant with ties to Hussein's government,
two university professors and a municipal official who had tried to
combat corruption. An American journalist was also recently killed, but
the circumstances are unclear.
whose own Islamic party, Fadhila, is believed to have growing influence
inside the police force, said he has imposed new orders to try to track
police vehicles involved in killings: Vehicles must bear numbers in
large digits on the side, and tinted glass was banned. He tried to
disband the two most notorious groups -- police intelligence and
internal affairs -- although lower-ranking officers said they still
operate as shadow forces at the direction of the Badr Organization, the
Supreme Council's military arm.
residents of Basra say power remains in the hands of those with guns.
They say the political parties -- the Supreme Council and the Fadhila
party in particular -- realize that exerting power over the police is
the surest way to secure influence and battle their rivals.
parties exercise their power through the security forces to impose
their political views," said Jamal Khazaal, the leader of the Sunni-led
Iraqi Islamic Party in Basra, who carries a pistol and travels with an
armed escort. "The
Lt Col Karen Kwiatkowski says-
In July of
last year, after just over 20 years of service, I retired as
a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force. I had served as a
communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, as a
speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the
Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense
staffs covering African affairs. I had completed Air Command and Staff
College and Navy War College seminar programs, two master's degrees,
and everything but my Ph.D. dissertation in world politics at Catholic
University. I regarded my military vocation as interesting, rewarding
and apolitical. My career started in 1978 with the smooth seduction of
a full four-year ROTC scholarship. It ended with 10 months of duty in a
strange new country, observing up close and personal a process of
decision making for war not sanctioned by the Constitution we had all
sworn to uphold...
spring of 2002, I was a cynical but willing staff officer,
almost two years into my
three-year tour at the office of the secretary
of defense, undersecretary for policy, sub-Saharan Africa. In
call for volunteers went out for the Near East South Asia directorate
(NESA). None materialized. By May, the call transmogrified into
posthaste demand for any staff officer, and I was "volunteered" to
enter what would be a well-appointed den of iniquity...
2002 until February 2003, I
observed firsthand the
formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans and watched the
latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence
nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. This seizure of the
of U.S. Middle East policy was directly visible to many of us working
in the Near East South Asia policy office, and yet there seemed to be
little any of us could do about it.
I saw a
narrow and deeply flawed policy favored by some executive
appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate and pressurize the
traditional relationship between policymakers in the Pentagon and U.S.
witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP usurp measured
and carefully considered assessments, and through suppression and
distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact
falsehoods to both Congress and the Executive Office of the President...
that there was indeed a preferred
NESA. My first
day in the office, a GS-15 career civil servant rather unhappily
advised me that if I wanted to be successful here, I'd better remember
not to say anything positive about the Palestinians. This belied
official U.S. policy of serving as an honest broker for resolution of
Israeli and Palestinian security concerns. At that time, there was a
great deal of talk about Bush's possible support for a Palestinian
state. That the Pentagon
could have implemented and, worse, was
implementing its own foreign policy had not yet occurred to me...
August 2002, the Office of Special Plans established its own
rhythm and cadence separate from the non-politically minded
professionals covering the rest of the region. While often accused of
creating intelligence, I saw only two apparent products of this office:
war planning guidance for Rumsfeld, presumably impacting Central
Command, and talking points on Iraq, WMD and
terrorism. These internal
talking points seemed to be a mélange crafted from obvious past
observation and intelligence bits and pieces of dubious origin.
in the preparation of any material prepared for
higher-ups and people outside the Pentagon. The talking points
statements about Saddam Hussein's proclivity for using chemical weapons
against his own citizens and neighbors, his existing relations with
terrorists based on a member of al-Qaida reportedly receiving medical
care in Baghdad, his widely publicized aid to the Palestinians, and
general indications of an aggressive viability in Saddam Hussein's
nuclear weapons program and his ongoing efforts to use them against his
neighbors or give them to al-Qaida style groups. The talking points
said he was threatening his neighbors and was a serious threat to the
Staff officers would always
request OSP's most current Iraq, WMD and
terrorism talking points. On occasion, these weren't available
approved form and awaited Shulsky's approval. The talking points were a
series of bulleted statements, written persuasively and in a convincing
way, and superficially they seemed reasonable and rational. Saddam
Hussein had gassed his neighbors, abused his people, and was continuing
in that mode, becoming an imminently dangerous threat to his neighbors
and to us -- except that none of his neighbors or Israel felt this was
the case. Saddam Hussein had harbored al-Qaida operatives and
and probably provided them with training facilities -- without
mentioning that the suspected facilities were in the
U.S./Kurdish-controlled part of Iraq. Saddam Hussein was pursuing and
had WMD of the type that could be used by him, in conjunction with
al-Qaida and other terrorists, to attack and damage American interests,
Americans and America -- except
that. Saddam Hussein had not been seriously weakened by war and
sanctions and weekly bombings over the past 12 years, and in fact was
plotting to hurt America and support anti-American activities, in part
through his carrying on with terrorists -- although here the
intelligence said the opposite. His support for the Palestinians
Arafat proved his terrorist connections, and basically, the time to act
was now. This was the gist of the talking points, and it remained on
message throughout the time I watched the points evolve.
We are neither in support of nor opposed to policy.
Neither are we questioning anyone's motives. We
are just reporting what happened. Policy carried out can become a
precedent for future policy.
From the website we read how the purported ringleader of the
9-11 attacks was identified as early as February of 2000 as a potential
al-Qaeda terrorist- (you can search the internet for Capt Scott
Philpott, USN, Naval Academy Class of 1983, and read plenty of articles
about this topic. Alternatively, search for Able Danger.)
- The Pentagon has been unable to validate claims that a
secret intelligence unit identified Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta as a
terrorist more than a year before the attacks, a Defense Department
spokesman said Monday.
Di Rita said that some research into the matter continues, but
thus far there has been no evidence that the intelligence unit, called
"Able Danger," came up with information as specific as an officer
associated with the program has asserted.
we found are mostly general references to terrorist cells," Di Rita
said, without providing detail.
officer, Army Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, said
identified Atta and three other future Sept. 11 hijackers as terrorists
in 2000. But Shaffer said military lawyers stopped the unit from
sharing the information with the FBI out of concerns about the legality
of gathering and sharing information on people in the United States.
and Homeland Security
said Pentagon researchers have found no evidence that Able
Danger had Atta's name. He said he was unsure whether the unit came up
with the identities of the other three hijackers but then said that
none of Shaffer's specific claims had been validated.
himself has not provided any documentary proof, Di Rita said,
and he said Shaffer has presented his information as second-hand.
Mr. Shaffer's account that several of the 9/11
hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, were identified through their
efforts prior to the terrorist attack," Zaid said.
On Monday, Navy
Capt. Scott Philpott told the Fox News Channel that he
had also told the Sept. 11 commission about Atta and Able Danger. In a
statement sent to Fox, Philpott wrote: "My story has remained
consistent. Atta was identified by Able Danger in early 2000."
said the Pentagon
week, he said Shaffer has no documentation related to Able Danger
because his security clearance was suspended in March 2004 for "petty
and frivolous" reasons such as a dispute over mileage
Comment- Look for this scenario to be used to further loosen the
restrictions on concerns about the
of gathering and sharing information on people in the United States.
That is why these officers (who are just doing
their duty) have been encouraged (betcha) to step forward. The
people and the congress can now demand more invasive legal capabilities
within the intelligence community. If you have not noticed, there
has been a struggle going on between the CIA and the Pentagon
intelligence department (newly formed under Rumsfield, who was
dissatisfied with what he was getting from CIA.) Note: The
primary motivational factor for starting this website was the world changing impact of 9-11 and its
aftermath. Post 9-11 history has shown itself to be leading
toward the characteristics of the Book
Revelation. One thing is certain- there is a great deal going
on behind the scenes within the intelligence community about which we
know nothing. This circumstance is just the tip of the iceberg.
from the website-
were lied to and
lured into the Iraqi quagmire resembles, in all its essentials, a
classic disinformation campaign such as would be run by a foreign
intelligence operation. The usurpation of authority in the national
security bureaucracy, the corruption of the intelligence-gathering
process – including the introduction of forged documents – and the
deployment of an extensive network both inside and outside of
government, all point to a
large-scale covert action designed to drag us into war. It
wouldn't be the first time a foreign intelligence agency played a key
role in getting us into a foreign war, and – as long as the Empire
lasts – it won't be the last.
At one point the President made the statement that the terrorists are
making their stand in Iraq.
disagree with my decision to remove Saddam Hussein from
power, but all of us can agree that the world's terrorists have now
made Iraq a central front in the war on terror," Bush said in a
address last month.
As the article points out,
Bush has cited
foreign fighters as a reason for continued US military
operations in Iraq. His argument, repeated often, is that ''the world's
terrorists" have chosen to make their stand in Iraq.
Now, in a speech the President has said
The new strategy
contained no surprises but a lot of unanswered
questions. Bush, as expected, ruled out any total U.S. withdrawal from
Iraq. He defined America's
nation of 25 million people with one of the largest oil reserves in the
world as establishing the country as "peaceful, united, stable, and
secure, well integrated into the international community, and a full
This begs the question, if we defeat the terrorists in Iraq and Iraq
becomes a full partner in
the global war on terrorism, then, does this not say that the
policy clearly calls for a continuation [post Iraq] of the war on
terrorism? Well, this can only mean that "victory" in Iraq over
"terrorism" means nothing more than a beginning (since more wars are
anticipated). Of course, a student of the Bible will not be
surprised at the fact that wars are in the future. We just did
not know how this would occur. Perhaps we do now.
In a recent op-ed piece entitled "Who
Iraq?", Cal Thomas makes a statement that is so
representative of the attitudes of many people who support US policy on
the War on Terror,
"peace is a
byproduct of defeating evil."
Friends, think of what he has said. We must rid the world of
"evil" people in order to have peace. Surely this has horrific
connotations. By the time all the sinners are
defeated, no one will be left.
Who is going to define
"evil?" Will the definition not eventually expand to
include anyone opposed to the "World Order", whatever that turns out to
To get a clearer picture of how this might unfold, see a recent speech
before the Naval War College by General Abizaid ...
If you look at the
geography (of Al Qaida) there is no
[Translation - they are
potentially everyone and they are no one.]
They are a
money, educate and organize.
[This could just as easily be
the Southern Baptist Convention and one day it will be.]
many pieces that we must focus on: the propaganda battle in the
media, safe houses, front companies, sympathetic members of legitimate
governments, human capital, fighters and leaders, technical
expertise, weapons suppliers, ideologically sympathetic non-government
organizations (charities), financiers, smugglers, and
[This is an exhaustive list. To control "Al Qaida" we are going
to have to control all charities, legitimate
governments, financiers, facilitators, media, front
capital [aka people]
etc. If you watch television, virtually all news commentary is
for the purpose of stirring us to action against bogeymen of every
persuasion. This is not limited to Al Qaida but includes all the
heinous crimes and their coverage. The coverage is about creating
animosity among the people toward "evil."]
The hobgoblin "Al Qaida" is the
best bogeyman ever invented. "It" can not even talk back.
"It" has no representation in the UN. "It" has no
president. "It" has no geography, no headquarters. There
on "it." [Does that include
Iraq?] The only time "it" speaks is when a video
mysteriously appears saying- I speak for "it" and "it'
believes bla, bla, bla... [thus "proving" the dark sentences
concerning "Al Qaida"]. "It" can mysteriously show up in the next
country the powers-that-be need to conquer.
Hard to argue with the video
quoting the non-existing, unknowable "virtual
organization connected by the internet". One of these videos appeared to influence
the recent presidential election [the week before the election, hehe]
and people actually took this seriously. By the time "evil" is
defeated the terrible choices revealed
in the Bible will be a reality.
from the webpage-
We read how the enemies of the country plan to overthrow the United
States as "blowback" from the 9-11 conspiracy. Since there are so
websites devoted to conspiracy theories (especially those supposedly
perpetrated by the United States), I make this observation - remember, an
intelligence operation can be against the United States
White House instead of by
the United States White House. So, when you try to
"9-11 conspiracy", you actually make the "blowback conspiracy"
is why there are so many conspiracy websites. Most conspiracy
websites are actually the blowback-conspiracy itself and many of those
the alarm" are the enemies of the nation.
there are. And from this, Alex, and I bring this out very clearly in
book 3, the only way we can stop it is with the classic counter-coup
d'etat where the military steps in. And under the aegis of the
itself, disengaging or
disemboweling the civilian hierarchy and taking
over and re-running or re-organizing the federal government.
Now the problem is they've got so many CFR minions in the
know that Clinton had some officers terminated and, in their office,
shot multiple times and the rest of it. We know that that happened but
the question is how many of the high level officers are on the
I can only say several of the highest level
are members now of the Council
Relations. The important
thing to consider is how many of them are sincere in their beliefs as
enunciated by the CFR.
of them personally who are three and four-star
generals. They are members of the CFR but "their heart belongs to
Jesus," if I can use that expression because they are true
Fidelity people. Some of them happen to be Marines. And I'm counting on
them to do the right thing.
So, if and when we see the military take the country back
from the CFR
bogeyman, we will know the fix is in. Notice that they are hoping
that those whose "heart belongs to Jesus" will conduct a counter coup
d'etat. This plays into the hands of the ultimate purpose of the Clash of Civilizations, blame for
and elimination of the fundamentalists. They want the
"heart-belongs-to-Jesus" boys to overthrow their own government.
In case you forgot, Operation
initially called Operation
Infinite Justice. Get it?
In spite of what may be good intentions by present leaders in their
desire to win the GWOT, what will happen to the constitution when the
Global War on Terror proceeds under other leadership?
Will the executive branch of government seize power?
Look at this quote-
Finally, the (a) Senate Committee on Intelligence of
the (b) Republican Party took a really sensational step (c) March 2007.
carefully drafted document it told the (d) Speaker of the House that,
although he was formally responsible
for (e) the United States' war policy, he must obey the orders of
the (f) Chief Executive;
Substitute the actual phrase
from the original quote-
(a) Reichstag group
(b) Centre Party
(c) October 16, 1916
(d) Reich Chancellor
(f) Supreme Command
The rest of the quote is here-
and that whatever the
decree issued by them, the Reichstag was prepared to support it. The
significance of this
declaration "extended far
beyond the immediate dispute concerning
warfare [substitute war-on-terror,
wire tapping, Patriot Act, Homeland Security, etc]; it was, in
fact, the first formal recognition of the
dictatorship of the German Army leaders,
not only in the military, but also in political affairs, and the
subordination of the Reich's Government
and the Reichstag to that dictatorship."
(B. Menne, The Case of Dr.
Bruening.) found here-
The fears of Americans are
being preyed upon to bring us closer to such an eventuality. In
our case, it might not be the dictatorship by the military, but, by
some increased executive element. The historical discussion (the
role of the Vatican in Germany, and elsewhere, during the 20th century)
in the link
above is interesting in and of itself.
In general, our country is under attack on several fronts:
(a) massive Federal debt approaching $8,400,000,000,000 (50% foreign
(b) $5,000,000,000+ per week
to fight a war in Iraq and Afghanistan (per Congressman Ron Paul)
(total cost todate to occupy Iraq and Aghanistan = $300,000,000,000)
(d) massive and unchecked immigration of a poor population from our
(e) a never ending strategy of war and Middle-eastern military bases in
(f) a debt inspired (and vulnerable) economy
(g) an entitlement minded society with already booked and increasing
future liabilities with a gutless Congress refusing to deal with the
(h) a deliberate?
strategy to threaten the Protestant heritage of America
(i) the globalization plan to get rid of the middle class, via the use
of debt and global trade
(j) the plan to merge the US, Canada, Mexico into one NAFTA-like
(l) the lies of politicians regarding the "benefits" of the global
(m) the ever increasing encroachment against the constitution to save
us from "terrorism" and other bogeyman
(n) the increasingly militarized attitude
of our society
(o) the 2005 trade deficit of $700,000,000,000
One recalls the words of Malachi Martin,
"The other two major contenders in the millennium
endgame will be
ELIMINATED " (* emphasis added). (p. 657)
The fearful thing is that one
(the Soviets) of these contenders is already eliminated. The
greatest tool used to eliminate the Soviets? Financial
the United States be next? Do a search on inflation in the Soviet
For perspective, read- http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vatican_in_world_politics_introduction.html
While all the above geopolitical destruction of the United States
proceeds unabated, the focused public debate is family values,
birth control, women in the priesthood, and the weirdo fundamentalist
abduction du jour.
Let's wildly speculate momentarily, even if only as a point of
reference. Witness Malachi Martin's cover quote-
"untold story behind the Vatican's role in today's winner-take-all
race against time to establish, maintain, and control the first
one-world government. " (cover)
Suppose the White House is in a proxy war with the Vatican who has an
intelligence arm (Jesuit?) coopting some Muslim
terrorism. Sounds ridiculous, but, use this assumption as a
method of thinking of some of the operational situations. If that
were the case, would not every attempt by the United States to create
"democracy" in the Middle East [read US hegemony by the Vatican] be
offset by a convenient "insurgency?" Could not every foray into
"peace" that did not meet all the objectives of the Vatican be
"interrupted" by sectarian violence. The real question is not
whether this wild speculation is true, but whether Malachi Martin was
correct. If he was correct, there has to be many, not some,
mechanisms for the following to be true [regardless of the verity of
the above speculation]-
"if tomorrow or next week, by a sudden miracle, a
government were established, the Church would not
have to undergo any essential structural change in order to retain
its DOMINANT position and to FURTHER its GLOBAL aims."
(* emphasis added) (p. 143)
Why is there so much more
readily available information regarding Vatican duplicity on the
internet? Is it possible that elements within the United
and elements within
the Vatican have a "partnership" designed to raise
the ire of conservative Protestant fundamentalists and conservative
Muslims (both of whom are viewed as the obstacle to world order -
Muslims opposing the emergence of the US presence in the Middle East
and Protestants opposing the primacy of the Vatican and "causing" Bush
invade Iraq)? Once their
ire is raised, outrageous action can be induced (or staged). Eliminating the
outrageous action becomes the modus vivendi of the
world order (aka Book of Revelation). Whether or not the
above scenario is an exact
depiction of the catalyzer, the resultant volatile chemistry will be as
depicted. It is a sad fact of history that both the Muslims and
now the conservative "Christians" are willing participants in their own
destruction. All you Southern Baptist [I'll pick on you
have been in your Sunday schools] flag waving patriots
demanding the defeat of Islam are
demanding your own demise. Be sure of your salvation and stop
falling for all the propaganda lest you and your lost neighbor be
spewed into the tribulation together.
[For those of you having trouble with this, let me spell it out for you
- Bush is a victim,
just like the rest of the unsuspecting world, of
group(s) (which includes blame for
"conspiracy"). This commentary is not about politics; it is
about the conditions preceding the Second Coming of The Lord Jesus
Christ. If you want to play politics (i.e., defend Republicans,
accuse Democrats or vice versa) then go ahead and hang around and get
in line for the mark of
the beast. The alternative to playing politics is the sovereignty
of THE ALMIGHTY GOD. I am going with the later and staying out of
the line for the mark of the beast.
what is about
to beset the world, especially when you consider the enormous power of
those behind the already developed scenario. If you want to waste
your time saying that
things will continue as they have been, you are whistling past the
grave yard. After this plays out, there will be no more America
as we know it.]
Many church goers are totally deceived, yes, church goers, not the
this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking
after their own lusts, and saying where is the promise of His coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were
from the beginning of the creation. - 2 Pet 3:3-4
They do not believe He is coming and they DO believe they must save the
world for "Christianity". At a recent Bible prophecy conference,
4000 people http://www.omegaletter.com/articles.asp?ArticleID=5767,
is coming. In fact, according to the author, the apathy factor has grown since
9-11. That is amazing to me. 9-11 is the primary
reason I started this website! It was a sure sign of a GIGANTIC GEOPOLITICAL EVENT.
If you try to talk endtimes with these church folk, they say you can
not know He is
coming. But, the Bible says you WILL know, if you are His, of the
general time of His coming.
a thief. Ye
we are not of the
let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.
-- 1 Thessalonians 5:4-6 End 05-20-2006
One of the biggest threats to peace is reportedly Iran. One of
the main reasons Iran is reported to be a threat is outrageous
statements attributed to the leader Ahmadinejad. A friend
of mine, Rob, and I have actually discussed whether or not Ahmadinejad
is a possible "plant" of some kind (since most things he says in public
seem to harm his own country).
Today, I found this interview-
Atrianfar is a political activist and close aide to former Iranian
President Hashemi Rafsanjani. He is the founder of three newspapers, Hamshahri,
Kargozaran, and Sharq
(the latter, recently closed). He was interviewed by Muriel
Mirak-Weissbach in his Tehran office on Dec. 7, and spoke through an
There are various views of the new situation of Iran, which can be
divided into three categories. Some here are very concerned about a
situation where the whole political structure of the region may be
compromised; some think nothing will happen; and some believe the
situation will get worse. I'm inclined to the third viewpoint. The two
viewpoints at opposite extremes belong to the radicals in Iran. Those
who believe nothing will happen mainly belong to what are often called
the hardliners in the right-wing camp. Mr. Ahmadinejad represents this
viewpoint. This viewpoint can also be seen in the people affiliated
with the Basij [see below], or others affiliated with the right-wing
faction. Such a viewpoint is not far-fetched on the part of military
people, because the military always talk tough; but politicians are
expected to behave differently. So, we don't endorse these views of
course, his views are not limited to Iran. They sometimes also threaten
other countries—you can understand this in the way he wrote a letter to
President Bush and in his speeches at the United Nations, from his
position on the Palestinians, Israel, etc. This suggests these people
think that Iran is the center of the universe and can bring about any
change they want. This is also false and cannot be accepted...
is a strong, serious challenge between the first and the third groups.
The hardliners now in power are just a minority of 20%, against a large
majority of 60-70% who are out of power. This large majority is like
the body, and the head—the 20%—now controls everything. This is what
the current picture of Iran is...
political activists criticize is that this military structure was
heavily involved in the  elections. This was opposed by Mr.
Rafsanjani and by Mr. Karroubi, and all reformist parties protested.
The Supreme leader [Ayatollah Khamenei] was expected to intervene, to
organize a fact-finding team to look into the Basij involvement. From
three to four months prior to the elections, some 400 opinion polls,
scientific surveys, were conducted, locally, regionally, and
nationally. None indicated a
win by Mr. Ahmadinejad. What happened? Is
it possible that an unidentified, unknown person could win? Or is it a
miracle, though we say the era of the Prophets is over? Or, there must
be irregularity, vote rigging.
the performance of Ahmadinejad in the first year, has been such that he
has alienated many of his wise supporters, even many people in his
government, his cabinet. So,
Ahmadinejad was not democratically
elected, although there was the appearance of a democratic process. It
was influenced by forces from the outside. . . .
So, since Iran is now
reportedly a major source of the problems in Iraq (and no longer the
bogeyman "al-Qaeda", good grief) and all the "terrorism" problems are
chiefly coming from Iran and Iran is the major problem with the
Hizbollah, etc, etc; then, who are the presumably "terrorist" forces from the outside who got
Amhadinejad elected? (My answer- the same people who manipulated Bush
to invade Iraq). If you believe defeating the "enemy" in Iran is
going to save the planet, think again.
Sorry, I just do not believe everything I see on TV, you know, the one
that tells you what you should think about and what you should think
about it. All this does not add up properly. My point is
simple - the world is being lead to the slaughter through dark sentences.
do not be around to see this
come to fruition.
There is more happening than the total collapse of the US dollar and
the US economy.
If you want to know how much the dollar is dropping, watch the price of
Gold goes up because the dollar is worth less. Gold is screaming
a loud message now.
Now for the news of the day-
Another shocking, blatant coverup attempt
The [Mexican] war
was also the first time (of many, many more to come) that the US
government outright lied as a pretext to declare war. The official
story spun by President James Polk at the time was that Mexican forces
invaded the United States, unprovoked, and ‘shed American blood on
Grant in his
that Mexico should
commence it. It was very doubtful whether Congress would declare war;
but if Mexico should attack our troops, the Executive could… prosecute
the contest with vigor. Once initiated there were but few public men
who would have the courage to oppose it.”
which his nation is engaged, no matter whether right or wrong, occupies
no enviable place in life or history.”
the United States
are filled with lies, deceit, false flag operations, imperialistic
conquest, and state-sponsored media propaganda. Those who dared
question the official stories were vilified and dismissed as
unpatriotic conspiracy theorists.
The most recent example was the
capture and death of Osama bin Ladin in May 2011 by the famed SEAL Team
conspicuous location in a small town surrounded by Pakistani military,
the handling of the body in accordance with a Muslim tradition that
doesn’t exist, the refusal to provide any real evidence to verify the
focused instead on the nationwide euphoria over the news.
and for all,
any further hint of question about the event with a new bill, HR 2819. The bill prohibits any
“officer or employee of the Federal Government from providing
information about the mission to kill Osama bin Laden to any person
outside the Federal Government…”
light on the
The gag order would remain in
effect until the CIA and Defense Department conduct their own
‘investigations’ and brief Congress; in other words, several years at
least. [At least until
the 3rd Tues in November 12 - smile]
it erodes the privacy of its citizens. If you don’t like how USA
PATRIOT Act provisions allow then to tap your telephone or check out
your rental history, they say, “Hey, if you have nothing to hide,
you have nothing to fear!”
Obviously the same reasoning
doesn’t apply to them… and it’s another example of the tragic farce that is modern
For those of us who are naive,
Bin Laden died of renal failure probably in late 2001.
The so-called raid on "Bin Laden" happened in a CIA "property" probably
CIA control for years. The cameras showing the operation went off for
the last 40 minutes of the "operation." Therefore, nobody saw the operation,
probably including Seal Team Six (because the last steps of the
operation were done by the CIA while "Seal Team Six" stood guard on the
perimeter.) Even if "Seal Team Six" participated, they could have seen nothing of
A simple question - why did members of "Seal Team Six" die
recently? This is a serious question.
Obama did not approve the "operation." The "operation" was decided upon
and he was TOLD by the CIA
that it was in progress
. Then, Obama goes on 60 Minutes and says "I did this and I did
Why was it necessary to keep a dead man alive long enough to kill him?
Why did Zbigniew Brzezinski say there is no such thing as organized
iternational Islamic terrorism?
Why did the CIA officer not arrest Bin Laden in the American Hospital
in Dubai in the summer of 2001? Could it be because Bin Laden was
a CIA asset? And, who was the Bin Laden who made video tapes
after he was dead and released them for the Presidential election of
You can compose your own questions from this point.
It is not deliberate
that I am answering this question
today. It just turned out that way. I received the
question this morning and I just noticed that it is the 10 year
anniversary of the birth of the TSA and the Patriot Act. Oops,
the Patriot Act was written before 9-11 and readily available for
Congressional approval (or do they really approve legislation any
more?). We know they do not read or write legislation, nor
can we find out what is in legislation until we approve it... I digress
Letter from Reader
When you get time, read this and see if you agree, especially paragraph
This adds weight to the widely-held view that the central
bankers are responsible for most terrorism, using MI-6, Mossad and the
CIA. Dr. Day also said that "war is obsolete" given the danger of
nuclear exchange so terrorism would be used instead. This was 1969.
Response for All Readers-
My first reaction is that somebody is out to bring down the
bankers. See this for the potential
movement. Truly, Malachi Martin says
in his book that the Western Capitalists (would this not include the
Central Banks, owned by private banks?) will be eliminated. Martin refers to the Western Capitalists
as the Golden
Internationale (in contrast
with the Red Internationale the moniker often associated with
communism). As Martin writes on page 657 - "The other two
contenders in the millennium endgame will be
ELIMINATED " (*
My second reaction is that this
is the 10th anniversary of the biggest fraud in the history of the
United States. If people believe that 9-11 was perpetrated by 19
Muslims (some of whom were alive after 9-11 because they apparently
survived crashing into buildings while flying jets), then these people who believe the 19
Muslims did it are conspiracy theorists that believe the 9-11
Commission's Official Conspiracy Theory. By definition, what is
presented in the official account is a conspiracy.
On the morning of 9-11, as I
sat in the dentist chair, the dental assistance told me around 9:15
what had happened. At that moment, I said to myself "they have done it." I
said this on 9-11-2001 because of the years of study I had done leading
up to the event. They
are the intelligence community, the subject of many years study for
me. In a 1993 manuscript I authored it says "the people will demand that the government
control their lives on account of terrorism."
What most people do not understand is that there are so many
involved in the military and intelligence community that one can hardly
call these contractors citizen "soldiers." They are mercenaries
controllers. These "controllers" can be anyone with any agenda.
And there are MANY levels above the controllers. Good luck
identifying who the top layer is. If we can run the
government WITHOUT having had a budget for YEARS, we certainly can
"run" the intelligence community without any Congressional/Governmental
oversight. Congress is nothing but a facade to make the people
believe they have a democracy, God forbid we call it a Republic.
Congress is completely controlled by staff ("contractors" if you want
to call them that because they took no oath), especially in the writing
of legislation and the process by which legislation is considered.
As an historical example of intelligence at the top, the Vatican
for all practical purposes was THE source of
information for the CIA during the Cold War. One could say that the
Vatican WAS the CIA to some extent. There
is a book documenting how the Vatican Ratlines enabled WWII Nazis to
enter the CIA post WWII. Later,
1958-1963, two socialist and/or "red" Popes were elected in the
Vatican Curia by the KGB, the
Vatican turned pro-Soviet and kicked the "pestilential rats" (the CIA)
out of the Vatican [the Pope who kicked out the CIA had previously,
before he became Pope, himself been kicked out of the Vatican by the
president who fired the director of
the CIA and threatened to break "the CIA into a thousand pieces" and
threatened to print US Treasury Notes (instead of Federal Reserve
Notes) was murdered, and a
Pope was murdered so that a John Paul II could be elected by the
CIA. The President was JFK and the man he fired, Allen
Dulles, sat on the Warren Commission.
Do you believe these facts are completey unrelated to 9-11? If
you believe they are unrelated it is because you are looking at the
ocean through a straw. This straw is provided to you by the
media. I NEVER watch the media any more because the definition of
news (as presented) is a sick joke. For me, this has been true
for at least 35 years.
There is PLENTY of evidence to support an alternative conspiracy
theory. The problem is that most people, because of their
emotional allegiance and dependence on certain worldviews vis-a-vis the
United States, can not psychologically
facts. If we took
one hour to examine the facts and had an open mind, our worldview
would be changed forever. This is an emotional risk we can not
take because this risk leads to a certain mental loss of those
hold dear. This brings us to the ultimate question - on
what does our hope and faith rest?
I could write a dissertation the size of this website about 9-11.
I will refrain from doing so because if you are a seeker you will
discover the truth in any case. If you are not a seeker, you will
never find the truth.
Furthermore, I delve
into this topic not because I believe the process of dictatorship,
which is prophesied in the Bible, can be stopped; but, because the 9-11
Conspiracy and our refusal to accept the truth of it is exactly how
the world government will come to pass. By the way, if we try to
stop the process, it will happen faster. That is why some want us
to take to the street.
If you are a seeker- See the books by David Ray Griffin.
Warning, the David Ray Griffin site may become, if not already,
coopted. Today is the first day I went to the site.
I read none of it. However, I have read 5 of the books by
Griffin. The site and movement seems to be evolving into a religious kingdom movement. The likely
outcome is that the 9-11 truth movement will be denigrated as a
whipping boy comparable to the accusations against the Tea Party (when
they tried to reduce spending) and thus "caused" the financial
crisis. In a similar manner the 9-11 truth movement will become a
generic "religious" target.
My friend, I have said over
and over and over on this website- stay out of
the streets, live peacably, obey the laws, and wait on the LORD because
there is NOTHING you can do
to stop the WILL of GOD. His will includes the Coming of
the Antichrist and the mark without which you can neither buy nor
sell. That is, all those not taken in the Rapture will come under
The ONLY thing that matters is Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your
Lord and Savior?
Do not become a Kingdom Maker.
The purpose of this website is to make sure you realize you have NO
earthly choices left, the Bible is true, its prophecies are coming to
pass quickly, and Jesus Christ is your only option. Choose this
day whom ye will serve.
We have discussed before that the War on Terror (aka Clash of Civilizations) has
Here we read an account of one who was taken prisoner and placed into a
camp for "al-Qaeda" terrorists.
For educational purposes, read the whole article. It will give
you a new perspective.
Staffer: Well ... what are
the chances that the son of the Bush family's main business contact in
Saudi Arabia – a family that is worth billions – suddenly becomes a
fanatical, fundamentalist Muslim and then supposedly blows up the World
Trade Towers? Pretty coincidental, I'd say. And there are plenty of
stories of bin Laden traveling to the US in the 1990s under the name of
Tim Osman to recruit for his cause, a cause apparently sponsored by the
CIA. After all, the CIA seemingly was responsible for aggregating the
original so-called al Qaeda in the 1980s when they were recruiting
young radicals to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. They collected a
data base that they called the base – as in al Qaeda. It was a "list."
The CIA seems obviously involved in the inception of al Qaeda, though
they deny it strenuously.
Staffer: Well, the
alternative is a kind of war. In Abyan Province in the South of Yemen,
the Americans are shelling certain urban areas on a daily basis –
places where rebellious tribesmen and al Qaeda are said to be. They are
sending in Saudi and American planes as well, and at night they are
apparently sending in SEALS with night-fighting equipment. This is a
significant illegal action. America apparently has numerous troops on
the ground on a nightly basis – and yet you read nothing about this is
America is very far gone now, from a truth-telling standpoint. Almost
everything reported in the mainstream press in America and even the
West is a lie of some sort, or at least a fudge. The purpose is always
the same – to promote world government. In fact, the more the Internet
tells the truth, the more the mainstream press does not. It's as if the
elite banking families that run the world are trying to counteract the
truth with lies and distortions.
Why would they do such a thing?
Obviously to take away more freedoms in the West. The target on this mostly phony war on
terror, in my view, is
the West and the middle class. The elites have been after middle
class freedoms for over a century. With the war on terror, they have
has a reason to escalate considerably. The Patriot Act, with all of its
reductions in what was left of freedom in the US, was
written before 9/11. During its signing they had the military
patrolling the corridors of Congress with guns. Congressmen were
intimidated. The situation in America and the West has gotten no better
since then. The great families want world government and they are
willing to remove any freedoms they need to in order to get it.
So the war on terror has little to do with al Qaeda?
In the prison I was in, people told me over and over that America and
Yemen were actually producing radicalized young men with their
Bell: How did that work?
I personally met only one man who claimed to be a
legitimate member of al Qaeda in a jail that supposedly was chock full
of al Qaeda. The rest were young men, mostly, who had the misfortune of
holding somewhat fundamentalist, or at least enthusiastic, views about
Bell: Thought crimes, in other words.
Sure. Some examples. A shopkeeper from Kenya who was taken prisoner
some six months ago for speaking to someone who held fundamentalist
views 17 years before. He was put in an even worse prison than the one
I was in. The worst prison in Yemen, where all the hard-core Jihadists
are supposedly locked up. He said it consisted of single, individual
cells – it was dungeonlike, in other words – and that you were not let
out even to go to the bathroom except occasionally. He said the primary
entertainment consisted of sitting on a ratty mattress watching your
urine pool in front of you. After several months of this, he was moved
to the prison where I was. By then he'd developed severe high blood
pressure. It was aggravated by the interrogations. He said he was
always being dragged in front of Americans from the embassy and that
his questioners included one Asian man, apparently from the CIA, who
was always shouting at him that he would spend the rest of his life in
prison if he didn't reveal information that he knew. The trouble was
that he was only a shopkeeper and didn't know anything. His last
significant Islamic conversation occurred 17 years ago. He was
desperate to get out because he had a business and a family and his
business was in ruins after nine months.
Why didn't they let him go?
Well, this is the sad part. The entire political prison
system in Yemen is built on the idea that there are many al Qaeda who
need to be identified. Thus, the Americans may pay a bounty for such
people – of one sort or another – and the Yemeni authorities are glad
to oblige by fueling the charade with innocent people.
So, how long, dear friend
before the USA is itself subjected to such treatment?
Staffer: Well ... let's
look at the realities. The dictators being deposed in the Middle East
are all secular. Hosni
of Egypt, Ben Ali of Tunisia, Muammar
of Libya – all of them are non-Islamic types. And what will come about
now? Probably the Muslim
in one way or another. The Brotherhood is apparently penetrated and to
a degree controlled by the CIA. So you have the spectacle of the West
actively deposing secularists in order to replace them with
controllable Muslim entities. Of course, it won't be portrayed that way
in the West. The Muslim Brotherhood will be painted as a radical sect
that poses an immediate danger to the West.
What are we to do about this?
Absolutely nothing. There is nothing you can do but pray.
Only get right with the Lord.
Even this is a matter for the individual conscience.
It is between you and the Lord only.
Please e-mail us
with questions or comments today.
may be wrong, but, the Bible is never wrong.