To Honor Jesus Christ, Glorify God,
Encourage Believers, & Warn All
Est 07-07-2005 Changed 09-14-2014
This information is
offered with the hope that YOU can come to KNOW
the Lord personally.
And in the latter time of
their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the
full, a king of fierce countenance , and understanding
dark sentences, shall stand up .
Daniel 8:25 And through his policy
also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify
himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall
also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he
shall be broken without hand.
The antichrist causes craft to prosper (Daniel
8:25). Craft in Strong's
Concordance is word # 4820 and means
deceit, and treachery."
He also shall understand
dark sentences in Daniel 8:23.
Interestingly enough, the Strong's Concordance word for dark AND sentences is the SAME
word, # 2420. They mean " a puzzle;
hence a trick"
saying. The expression comes from the root word
#2330 which means "to put forth." This must mean
that the eventual antichrist will purposely use (put forth) language
designed to trick the hearer.
Consequently, since the same word (2420) is used twice,
the " trick" is to give out double
meanings in the
same dark sentences. The essence of an
intelligence operation is misleading information (dual
information). The antichrist (DURING HIS RISE)
Therefore, he must understand them when used by
others. Who are the others? Daniel 8:23 tells
us that when the transgressors
are come to the full. Notice that there is
more than one transgressor. TransgressorS
(plural) come to
the full. These transgressors apparently
use dark sentences which the Assyrian
We have shown previously how the policy
of a "war on terror" could fulfill the role of
antichrist in confirming the "covenant" in effect
during the coming tribulation.
The antichrist, known as the
Assyrian in the Bible, therefore will have been (and
will be) involved in intelligence operations in the "war on terror" to establish
A few examples of dual meanings (dark sentences) -
really translates into "war",
and (for some) "war on
terror" means "war
on Islam" later resulting in "war on the Christians
of the West". Moreover, "democracy" closely
looks too much like "martial
law." By the time the Assyrian antichrist rises
to power he will, in all likelihood, have already become
well versed in the art of dark sentences.
No matter the intent or motives of individuals or
governments or government leaders, like us all
individually, governments and their leaders had better do
some serious self examination,
lest they become transgressors and when their
policy is come to the full, they will have
opened the door to the Assyrian
antichrist in a place
the Bible has already identified for us.
Sound far fetched? Consider the Bible verse that
falls BETWEEN the two verses we just discussed.
Daniel 8:24 And his power shall be mighty, but
his own power: and he shall destroy
wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practice, and shall
destroy the mighty and the holy people.
It is clear that the Assyrian antichrist will have
power GIVEN TO HIM, verse 24. Where does he get this
power? The previous verse (23) says when
the transgressors are come to the full marks the
time for the fraud, deceit and treachery of the Assyrian. If we
look carefully, the Bible tells us that the Assyrian is going to receive a
When this crown is given to the
Assyrian, he will also have a military
at his disposal.
Can you think of any place in the world that already
has a military on the ground and where this place
desperately needs a leader to change the direction
of its angry peoples, some of whom can only be
coopted by the use of dark sentences?
A place where "regime change" and the doctrine of "preemptive
the battlegrounds described in Daniel chapter
11:36-45 (which ends with a "palace" in Jerusalem) Which
mimics the war campaign of Revelation chapter 6?
Note on "conspiracy" theories:
Since the antichrist and
the transgressors are going to
practice fraud, deceit, and treachery (dark sentences) whose real nature is
inherently and deliberately difficult to comprehend,
is this not a conspiracy by definition?
Merriam-Webster definition of conspire: to join in a secret agreement to do an
unlawful or wrongful act. Since the Bible says, God
shall send them strong delusion that they should
believe a lie (2 Thess 2:11), then the very
nature of the endtimes deception makes it a
conspiracy. An example is Mystery
Babylon the Great. If she is a Mystery,
then, she will be hidden from the people at large.
Have you ever asked yourself this
question - How will it happen that the peace
and safety touted by the world will actually
become as many as would not worship the image of
the beast should be killed and that
they should kill one another: and there was given
unto him a great sword. How will it
happen that she made
all nations drink of the wine of the wrath
of her fornication?
How will it happen that God will call for a
sword against him throughout all my mountains
[kingdoms], saith the Lord GOD: every man's
sword shall be against his brother? How
will the Lord accomplish this except through men? Is
the Lord going to magically cause men to suddenly
start killing each other for reasons the men know
not? Or is He going to prepare
a way? See, for example, be
thou prepared, and prepare for thyself (Eze
Already, the intelligence
effort in Iraq is increasing, making intelligence the
premium asset for future operations. Quotes are
from Janes Intelligence (Copyright Janes Intelligence
Digest, Jul 22, 2005)
the US Army plans to establish a joint
intelligence centre to aid
counter-insurgency efforts and The
Iraqi intelligence services set up in mid-2004 under
then-interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi are largely
CIA, which now maintains in Baghdad
biggest foreign station in its history,
with more than 500 personnel. This eclipses its
Saigon station at the height of the Vietnam War...
There have also been persistent reports
that some of the 20,000 contractors
operating in Iraq outside of military control, are
working undercover for the CIA and
that some are alleged to be running 'deaths squads'
similar to those that operated in Vietnam under the
CIA's Phoenix Programme which was charged with
assassinating suspected Vietcong officials.
Given such rumours, it is hardly surprising that
these men - mainly ex-soldiers from the US and
Europe who also work as bodyguards, interrogators
and prison staff - have become prime targets for the
It has long been preached that Russia is Magog and Russia will attack
Israel. Well (even considering the source), is it
a legitimate question to ask 'could it be, at
least indirectly, the results of actions of the United
States, or at least some elements of the intelligence
community connected with the US?' We have
already established that Magog invaders are partly from
the Caucasus regions. Now read portions of this
speech by Vladislav Surkov, Putin's top aid. (Actually, the whole
article is interesting, but we'll limit the quotes to
what is relevant, but you probably should read it
all.) Imagine that Surkov is a conservative US
Congressman, a loyal patriot, who can not believe what
is happening to surrender American sovereignty to NAFTA,
CAFTA, globalism, etc
and who does not want to give up certain liberties for
"safety".. Surkov is speaking to a business
forum. The suffering of the Russian people has
been enormous. They lost 10,000,000 people in
WWII, just one example. Stalin was reported to
have killed millions more. They suffered greatly
as a result of the "fall" and the "revolution" of 1992
and the incredible inflation.
system as complex, as our country, can not afford fast and
dramatic changes. Democracy is not our only objective. We
care about the Russian Federation’s sovereignty....
has to be integrated, but the value of national cultures
does not decrease, it only grows instead. One has to safeguard sovereignty.
There is also the immediate task of fighting terrorism, that
threatens our country’s integrity, and, therefore, threatens our sovereignty. The
Caucasus is [problem] number one. Unfortunately, the
situation isn’t getting any better there. It is even
getting worse. It looks like an underground fire. And
we’ve got nothing to boast about there.
witness definite movement by Finland, Estonia and the EU
on the issue of Finno-Ugrian nations. It has suddenly been
discovered that we [Russia] opress them somehow [does this sound familiar?].
discriminated against in our country [does this sound familiar?]. And
regions, where these Finno-Ugrians constitute a majority
of the population, do hold a strategic amount of our oil
reserves. I am not
a fan of conspiracy theories.
reporter, and researcher might as well have "not a fan
of conspiracy theories" on his lapel, chuckle, so
he can appear "reasonable". The emperor has no
clothes.] But this is obviously a premeditated
system of operations [against Russia]. Last
week there was a resolution in PACE about how “we” oppress
the Finno-Ugric nations (the Hants, the Mansi, the
Chuvash, the Komi peoples etc). These are yesterday’s
schemes, and they’re evident. And I didn’t even start to
mention all those “orange
revolutions”, about humanitarian institutes’
activities. It’s common knowledge, that Freedom House is
headed by Woolsey, who used to be the head of the CIA. It takes an idiot to believe in
the humanitarian mission of this “establishment”
[Surkov uses the word “kontora”, which means “office” in
Russian and used to be a codename of the KGB in Soviet
times]. We also should not forget, that specific circles
in those countries are also pursuing similar tasks. We
have to take this into account in our work...
spite of the integrity of Western economics, the French
elite is considered as French, and the German as German. I
think that while the Russian
ruling elite is still an offshore aristocracy, till
it understands, maybe not in this generation, that it is,
for all that, a national bourgeoisie, we will have nothing
good in our country. We will dangle in a critical gap.
The sovereignty of
Russia is at stake is what Surkov is saying. So,
before we ride off into the sunset proud of our
"overthrowing the evil empire" we had better give pause
for thought as to what is coming
to the whole world.
If "humanitarian mission"
is not a dark sentence, then, "orange
revolutions" do not kill people.
from the website-
Once again, I am not
attempting to attribute bad motives to our
leaders. God put these men in office and made
them think the way they do to fulfill His will.
However, from the link above we can see clearly that
the scenario that Seymour Hersh described as "riding with the bad boys"
is clearly in play in the Middle East. These
developments are certainly going to be part of the Dark
Sentences played out in the covert and
military world which will eventually be adopted by the
One must consider that the source of this information
is Moscow, who is worried about the presence of US
special forces in the southern Caucasus region and
elsewhere. But friends, someone has to be the
worldwide enforcer for the coming world order and we
know the antichrist arises "not by his own power."
Daniel 8:24). Who else is it going to be?
I have no way to verify the accuracy of the following,
but, I have seen similar reports in various
places. We know that Dark Sentences
is going to take place because the Bible tells us that
it will. Could this be a description of its
By Chris Floyd
01/21/2005 "Moscow Times" --
than two years ago, we wrote here of a secret Pentagon plan
to foment terrorism by sending covert agents to
infiltrate terrorist groups and goad them into
action -- in other words,
committing acts of murder and destruction. The
purpose was two-fold: first, to bring the
terrorist groups into the open,
where they could be counterattacked; and second, to justify U.S.
military attacks on the countries where the
terrorists were operating
-- attacks which, in the Pentagon's words, would put
those nations' "sovereignty at risk."
It was a plan that countenanced -- indeed,
encouraged -- the deliberate murder of innocent
people and the imposition of U.S. military rule
anywhere in the world that U.S. leaders desired.
[Sounds like the
worst kind of propaganda, but, when the Bible says they shall kill one another, to what is it
referring? If the United States is "riding with the bad boys"
and calling it "democracy"
have you got a better description than Dark Sentences? We will reap what we
sow. The principle of preemptive war is a long
held doctrine of the neo-cons, who as it curiously turns
out, are a by product of the left in the 1960s (so says Congressman Ron
Paul's website above) (and we know where the merger
of the left into "conservatism" started) .]
This plan is now being
In fact, it's being expanded,
as The New
Yorker's Seymour Hersh revealed last
week. Not only will U.S.-directed agents infiltrate existing
terrorist groups and provoke them into action, but
the Pentagon itself will create its own terrorist
groups and "death squads."
After establishing their terrorist "credentials"
through various atrocities and crimes, these
American-run groups will then be able to ally with -- and
ultimately undermine -- existing terrorist groups.
Top-level officials in the
Pentagon, the U.S. intelligence services and the
Bush administration confirmed to Hersh
that the plan is going forward,
under the direction of Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld -- just as we noted here in November 2002.
Through a series of secret executive orders, George
W. Bush has given Rumsfeld the authority to turn the
entire world into "a global free-fire
zone," a top Pentagon adviser
says. These secret operations will be carried out
with virtually no oversight; in many cases, even the top
military commanders in the affected regions will not
be told about them. The American
people, of course, will never know what's being done
in their name.
The covert units --
including the Pentagon-funded terrorist groups and
hit squads -- will be operating outside all
constraints of law and morality. "We're going to be riding with the bad boys,"
one insider told Hersh. Another likened it to the
palmy days of the Reagan-Bush years: "Do you
remember the right-wing execution squads in El
Salvador? We founded them and we financed them. The
objective now is to recruit locals in any area we
want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about
it." Indeed, we reported here last summer that Bush
has already budgeted $500 million to fund local
paramilitaries and guerrilla groups in the most
volatile areas of the world, a measure guaranteed to
produce needless bloodshed, destruction and
suffering for innocent people already ravaged by
conflict. [An interview with Hersh
can be read here- http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/11/142250
The activation of the
Pentagon terrorist operation is part of Bush's
second-term expansion of the "war on terror."
Despite some obfuscating rhetoric about "diplomacy,"
[Dark Sentences] the
military fronts in the "global free-fire zone." Any
dissenting voices within the government are being
ruthlessly purged. The Pentagon's secret forces are
set for operations in at least 10 countries, and
Bush insiders "repeatedly" told Hersh that "Iran is
the next strategic target." [Will this provoke an
Iran has long been a
focus of the small clique of "global dominationists"
-- led by Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney and
their acolytes -- who engineered the invasion of
Iraq. [You can read a
history of the so-called neo-cons, whose advice
the president is heeding, on Congressman Ron
Paul's website- http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm ] This group is determined to
"whack Iran," as one insider put it, and they're not
at all discouraged by the debacle in Iraq; indeed,
to them it's a rousing success. Their first
objective -- openly stated years ago, before Bush
took office -- was the overthrow of Saddam
Hussein's regime and the planting of a U.S.
"military footprint" in Iraq.
This has now been done. The fact that it has plunged
the Iraqi people into a hell of violence, chaos,
terror and extremism is of no real concern to the
clique. Their lofty rhetoric about "freedom"
is meaningless sham, shuck and jive for the rubes
[Dark Sentences]. By
the admission of the clique's own publications, they
seek strategic control over the world's energy
resources in order to preserve and
expand American geopolitical and economic hegemony
in the new century.
[Do a search
for Project for the New American Century].
Everything else -- including
the security of the American people, put at
increasing risk by the clique's reckless policies --
is of secondary importance.
U.S. forces are already
conducting military reconnaissance inside Iran in
preparation for strikes on alleged nuclear weapons
facilities, Hersh reports. The Pentagon is
feverishly updating war plans for a "maximum ground
and air invasion of Iran," incorporating the new
staging areas now available in Iraq, Afghanistan and
Pakistan, while employing an Iranian
terrorist group, MEK, to launch covert ops and
terrorist acts against Tehran. MEK was once given
sanctuary by Hussein, who used the group as a brutal
enforcer against Kurd and Shiite insurgents.
Now Bush, "riding with the bad boys," has embraced
the MEK murderers as his own.
In their ignorance and
arrogance, the Bushists will almost certainly strike
at Iran -- despite the fact that even Iranian
dissidents support the effort to make their nation a
nuclear power and would join the mullahs in
retaliation. The result will be a conflict far
surpassing the horror and magnitude of the Iraq
In our original report on
the Pentagon's terror scheme, we wrote: "Bush and
his cohorts are plunging the world into an abyss, an
endless night of murder and terror -- wholesale,
retail, state-sponsored, privatized; of fear and
degradation, servility, chaos, and the perversion of
all that's best in us." Now the night has come. Now
the United States stands openly -- even proudly --
for terrorism, torture and the Hitlerian principle
of aggressive war. America has fallen into the pit
-- and the hopes of the world go with it.
from the wesbite-
we read of more confimation concerning the early
stages of the development of the they-shall-kill-one-another
-- Shiite and
Kurdish militias, often operating as part of Iraqi government
security forces, have carried out a wave of abductions,
assassinations and other acts of intimidation,
consolidating their control over territory across northern and
southern Iraq and deepening the country's divide
along ethnic and sectarian lines, according to political
leaders, families of the victims, human rights activists
and Iraqi officials.
Iraqi representatives wrangle over the drafting of a
constitution in Baghdad, forces represented by the
militias and the Shiite and Kurdish parties that control
them are creating
their own institutions of authority,
unaccountable to elected governments, the activists and
officials said. In
Basra in the south, dominated by the Shiites, and Mosul
in the north, ruled by the Kurds, as well as
cities and villages around them, many residents say they
are powerless before the growing sway of the militias,
which instill a climate of fear that many see as redolent
of the era of former president Saddam Hussein.
parties and their armed wings are sometimes operating
independently, and other times as part of Iraqi army and
police units trained and equipped by the United
States and Britain and controlled by the central
government. Their growing authority has enabled them to
seize territory, confront their perceived enemies and
provide patronage to their followers. Their rise has come
because of a power vacuum in Baghdad and their own success
in the January elections.
the formation of a government this spring, Basra, Iraq's
second-largest city, has witnessed dozens of
assassinations, claiming members of the former
ruling Baath Party, Sunni political leaders and officials
of competing Shiite parties. Many have been carried out by
uniformed men in police vehicles, according to political
leaders and families of the victims, with some of the
bullet-riddled bodies dumped at night in a trash-strewn
parcel known as The Lot. The province's governor said in
an interview that Shiite militias have penetrated the police
force; an Iraqi official estimated that as many
as 90 percent of officers were loyal to religious parties.
Iraq, Kurdish parties have employed a previously
undisclosed network of at least five detention
facilities to incarcerate hundreds of Sunni Arabs,
Turkmens and other minorities abducted and secretly
transferred from Mosul, Iraq's third-largest
city, and from territories stretching to the Iranian
border, according to political leaders and detainees'
families. Nominally under the authority of the U.S.-backed
Iraqi army, the militias have beaten up and threatened
government officials and political leaders deemed to be
working against Kurdish interests; one bloodied official
was paraded through a town in a pickup truck, witnesses
don't see any difference between Saddam and the way the
Kurds are running things here," said Nahrain Toma, who
heads a human rights organization, Betnahrain, with
offices in northern Iraq and has faced several death
Toma said the tactics
were eroding what remained of U.S. credibility as the
militias operate under what many Iraqis view as the
blessing of American and British forces. "Nobody wants
anything to do with the Americans anymore," she said.
"Why? Because they gave the power to the Kurds and to
the Shiites. No one else has any rights."
problem," said Majid Sari, an adviser in the Iraqi Defense
Ministry in Basra, who travels with a security detail of
25 handpicked Iraqi soldiers. "They're taking money from
the state, they're taking clothes from the state, they're
taking vehicles from the state, but their loyalty is to
the parties." Whoever disagrees, he said, "the next day
you'll find them dead in the street."
whose authority runs through Basra and parts of southern
Iraq, have called the killings "totally unacceptable."
are aware of allegations that men in police
uniforms, whether they are genuine policemen or not, are
carrying out serious crimes in Basra," said Karen
McLuskie, a British spokeswoman. "We are raising our
concerns with the Iraqi authorities at the highest level.
Badr Organization, one of the most powerful militias in
southern Iraq and blamed for many of the assassinations,
denied any role in the killings. The head of the group in
Basra, Ghanim Mayahi, said his organization was only
providing "support and assistance" to the police through
lightly armed militiamen. "There is no law, there is no
order, and the police are scared of the tribes. Badr is
not afraid, and it can face those threats."
the north, Kurdish officials acknowledged that terrorism
suspects from across the region have been taken to several
Kurdish-run detention facilities, but they said the
practice was initiated by the Iraqi government with the
blessing of the U.S. military. "It's a question of space;
they have no place to put them and here it is safe," said
Karim Sinjari, the minister of interior for the Kurdistan
Regional Government and a senior official in the Kurdistan
June, however, U.S. officials denied any role and called
for an end to the "extra-judicial detentions." A State
Department memo at the time warned that abductions in the
contested northern city of Kirkuk had "greatly exacerbated
tensions along purely ethnic lines" and
threatened U.S. standing.
both northern and southern Iraq, the parties and their
militias defend their tactics as a way of ensuring
security in an increasingly lawless atmosphere. In part,
they say, their power reflects their success in January's
national and local elections, in which the Kurdistan
Democratic Party and its counterpart, the Patriotic Union
of Kurdistan, and the Shiite-led Supreme Council for the
Islamic Revolution in Iraq and other Islamic parties won
overwhelmingly in their respective regions.
critics charge that they are wresting control over
security forces to claim de facto territory and authority,
effectively partitioning Iraq even as representatives in
Baghdad struggle to negotiate a permanent constitution.
"We have a feeling that our Islamic brothers want power,
regardless of the law and regardless of the state," said
Rahi Muhajir, who leads the Communist Party in Nasiriyah,
130 miles north of Basra. "They want authority and they
want to stay permanently."
the streets of Basra, a dreary, dun-hued port of 1.5
million people on the banks of the Shatt al Arab, the
local police force of 13,600 has become as much an
instrument of fear as security. Mohammed Musabah, the
governor of Basra, acknowledged that the police were
infiltrated by religious parties, the most powerful of
which is the Supreme Council. His police chief, Hassan
Sawadi, went further. He told a British newspaper, the
Guardian, that he had lost control over three-quarters of
his police force and that militiamen inside its ranks were
using their posts to assassinate opponents. Soon after,
Musabah said, the Interior Ministry ordered Sawadi not to
speak again publicly
Since May, political
leaders estimate that as many as 65 assassinations have
occurred in Basra. Among them were a lieutenant
colonel in the Defense Ministry, a Baath Party-era police
officer, a merchant with ties to Hussein's government, two
university professors and a municipal official who had
tried to combat corruption. An American journalist was
also recently killed, but the circumstances are unclear.
own Islamic party, Fadhila, is believed to have growing
influence inside the police force, said he has imposed new
orders to try to track police vehicles involved in
killings: Vehicles must bear numbers in large digits on
the side, and tinted glass was banned. He tried to disband
the two most notorious groups -- police intelligence and
internal affairs -- although lower-ranking officers said
they still operate as shadow forces at the direction of
the Badr Organization, the Supreme Council's military arm.
residents of Basra say power remains in the hands of those
with guns. They say the political parties -- the Supreme
Council and the Fadhila party in particular -- realize
that exerting power over the police is the surest way to
secure influence and battle their rivals.
exercise their power through the security forces to
impose their political views," said Jamal Khazaal, the
leader of the Sunni-led Iraqi Islamic Party in Basra,
who carries a pistol and travels with an armed escort. "The
longer a secret."
Col Karen Kwiatkowski says-
July of last year, after just over 20 years of service, I
retired as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force. I
had served as a communications officer in the field and in
acquisition programs, as a speechwriter for the National
Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air
Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs
covering African affairs. I had completed Air Command and
Staff College and Navy War College seminar programs, two
master's degrees, and everything but my Ph.D. dissertation
in world politics at Catholic University. I regarded my
military vocation as interesting, rewarding and
apolitical. My career started in 1978 with the smooth
seduction of a full four-year ROTC scholarship. It ended
with 10 months of duty in a strange new country, observing
up close and personal a process of decision making for war
not sanctioned by the Constitution we had all sworn to
the spring of 2002, I was a cynical but willing staff
officer, almost two years into my three-year tour
at the office of the secretary of defense,
undersecretary for policy, sub-Saharan Africa. In April, a
call for volunteers went out for the Near East South Asia
directorate (NESA). None materialized. By May,
the call transmogrified into a posthaste demand for any
staff officer, and I was "volunteered" to enter what would
be a well-appointed den of iniquity...
May 2002 until February 2003, I observed firsthand
the formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans
and watched the latter stages of the neoconservative
capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in the run-up
to the invasion of Iraq. This seizure of the
reins of U.S. Middle East policy was directly visible to
many of us working in the Near East South Asia policy
office, and yet there seemed to be little any of us could
do about it.
a narrow and deeply flawed policy favored by some
executive appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate and
pressurize the traditional relationship between
policymakers in the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence
I witnessed neoconservative agenda
bearers within OSP usurp measured and carefully considered
assessments, and through suppression and distortion of
intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact
falsehoods to both Congress and the Executive Office of
learned that there was indeed a preferred ideology
for NESA. My first day in the office, a GS-15
career civil servant rather unhappily advised me that if I
wanted to be successful here, I'd better remember not to
say anything positive about the Palestinians. This belied
official U.S. policy of serving as an honest broker for
resolution of Israeli and Palestinian security concerns.
At that time, there was a great deal of talk about Bush's
possible support for a Palestinian state. That the Pentagon could
have implemented and, worse, was implementing its own
foreign policy had not yet occurred to me...
August 2002, the Office of Special Plans established its
own rhythm and cadence separate from the non-politically
minded professionals covering the rest of the region.
While often accused of creating intelligence, I saw only
two apparent products of this office: war planning
guidance for Rumsfeld, presumably impacting Central
Command, and talking points on Iraq,
WMD and terrorism. These internal talking points seemed
to be a mélange crafted from obvious past observation
and intelligence bits and pieces of dubious origin.
They were propagandistic in style, and all
desk officers were ordered to use them verbatim in the
preparation of any material prepared for higher-ups and
people outside the Pentagon. The talking points
included statements about Saddam Hussein's proclivity for
using chemical weapons against his own citizens and
neighbors, his existing relations with terrorists based on
a member of al-Qaida reportedly receiving medical care in
Baghdad, his widely publicized aid to the Palestinians,
and general indications of an aggressive viability in
Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program and his ongoing
efforts to use them against his neighbors or give them to
al-Qaida style groups. The talking points said he was
threatening his neighbors and was a serious threat to the
would always request OSP's most current Iraq, WMD and
terrorism talking points. On occasion, these
weren't available in an approved form and awaited
Shulsky's approval. The talking points were a series of
bulleted statements, written persuasively and in a
convincing way, and superficially they seemed
reasonable and rational. Saddam Hussein had gassed his
neighbors, abused his people, and was continuing in
that mode, becoming an imminently dangerous threat to
his neighbors and to us -- except that none of his
neighbors or Israel felt this was the case.
Saddam Hussein had harbored al-Qaida operatives and
offered and probably provided them with training
facilities -- without mentioning that the suspected
facilities were in the U.S./Kurdish-controlled part of
Iraq. Saddam Hussein was pursuing and had WMD of the
type that could be used by him, in conjunction with
al-Qaida and other terrorists, to attack and damage
American interests, Americans and America -- except the
intelligence didn't really say that. Saddam
Hussein had not been seriously weakened by war and
sanctions and weekly bombings over the past 12 years,
and in fact was plotting to hurt America and support
anti-American activities, in part through his carrying
on with terrorists -- although here the intelligence said the
opposite. His support for the Palestinians and
Arafat proved his terrorist connections, and basically,
the time to act was now. This was the gist of the
talking points, and it remained on message throughout
the time I watched the points evolve.
We are neither in support of nor opposed to policy.
Neither are we questioning anyone's motives. We are just
reporting what happened. Policy carried out can
become a precedent for future policy.
From the website we read how the purported ringleader of
the 9-11 attacks was identified as early as February of
2000 as a potential al-Qaeda terrorist- (you can
search the internet for Capt Scott Philpott, USN, Naval
Academy Class of 1983, and read plenty of articles about
this topic. Alternatively, search for Able Danger.)
The Pentagon has been unable to validate claims that a
secret intelligence unit identified Sept. 11 hijacker
Mohamed Atta as a terrorist more than a year before the
attacks, a Defense Department spokesman said Monday.
Rita said that some research into the matter continues,
but thus far there has been no evidence that the
intelligence unit, called "Able Danger," came up with
information as specific as an officer associated with the
program has asserted.
found are mostly general references to terrorist cells,"
Di Rita said, without providing detail.
Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, said Able Danger
identified Atta and three other future Sept. 11
hijackers as terrorists in 2000. But Shaffer said
military lawyers stopped the unit from sharing the
information with the FBI out of concerns about the legality of
gathering and sharing information on people in the
publicized by Rep. Curt
Weldon, R-Pa., vice chairman of the House Armed Services
and Homeland Security committees.
Rita said Pentagon researchers have found no evidence that
Able Danger had Atta's name. He said he was unsure whether
the unit came up with the identities of the other three
hijackers but then said that none of Shaffer's specific
claims had been validated.
has not provided any documentary proof, Di Rita said, and
he said Shaffer has presented his information as
Shaffer's attorney, Mark
Zaid, responded that Shaffer's assertions will be proven.
"Additional Able Danger team
members are coming forward to specifically validate and
support Mr. Shaffer's account that several of the 9/11
hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, were identified
through their efforts prior to the terrorist attack,"
Monday, Navy Capt. Scott Philpott told the Fox News
Channel that he had also told the Sept. 11 commission
about Atta and Able Danger. In a statement sent to Fox,
Philpott wrote: "My
story has remained consistent. Atta was identified by
Able Danger in early 2000."
the Pentagon is
looking for documents in the wrong places and talking to
the wrong people.
he said Shaffer has no documentation related to Able
Danger because his security clearance was suspended in
March 2004 for "petty and frivolous" reasons such as a
dispute over mileage reimbursement.
Comment- Look for this scenario to be used to further
loosen the restrictions on concerns about the legality of
gathering and sharing information on people in the
United States. That is why
these officers (who are just doing their duty) have been
encouraged (betcha) to step forward. The people
and the congress can now demand more invasive legal
capabilities within the intelligence community. If
you have not noticed, there has been a struggle going on
between the CIA and the Pentagon intelligence department
(newly formed under Rumsfield, who was dissatisfied with
what he was getting from CIA.) Note: The
primary motivational factor for starting this website
was the world changing impact of
9-11 and its aftermath. Post 9-11 history
has shown itself to be leading toward the characteristics of the
Book of Revelation. One thing is certain-
there is a great deal going on behind the scenes within
the intelligence community about which we know
nothing. This circumstance is just the tip of the
from the website-
As I have said on many occasions,
the process by which we were lied to and lured into the
Iraqi quagmire resembles, in all its essentials, a classic
disinformation campaign such as would be run by a foreign
intelligence operation. The usurpation of authority in the
national security bureaucracy, the corruption of the
intelligence-gathering process – including the
introduction of forged documents – and the deployment of
an extensive network both inside and outside of
government, all point to a large-scale covert action designed to drag
us into war. It wouldn't be the first time a
foreign intelligence agency played a key role in getting
us into a foreign war, and – as long as the Empire lasts –
it won't be the last.
At one point the President made the statement that the
terrorists are making their stand in Iraq.
may disagree with my decision to remove Saddam Hussein
from power, but all of us can agree that the world's terrorists have
now made Iraq a central front in the war on terror,"
Bush said in a radio address last month.
As the article points out,
Bush has cited foreign
fighters as a reason for continued US military
operations in Iraq. His argument, repeated often, is
world's terrorists" have chosen to make their stand in
Now, in a speech the President has said
The new strategy
contained no surprises but a lot of unanswered
questions. Bush, as expected, ruled out any total U.S.
withdrawal from Iraq. He defined America's long-term goal in
the California-sized nation of 25 million people with
one of the largest oil reserves in the world as
establishing the country as "peaceful, united, stable,
and secure, well integrated into the international
community, and a full
partner in the global war on terrorism."
This begs the question, if we defeat the terrorists in
Iraq and Iraq becomes a full partner in the global war on
terrorism, then, does this not say that the
policy clearly calls for a continuation [post Iraq] of the
war on terrorism? Well, this can only mean that
"victory" in Iraq over "terrorism" means nothing more than
a beginning (since more wars are anticipated). Of
course, a student of the Bible will not be surprised at
the fact that wars are in the future. We just did
not know how this would occur. Perhaps we do now.
In a recent op-ed piece entitled "Who Is Lying in Iraq?",
Cal Thomas makes a statement that is so representative of
the attitudes of many people who support US policy on the
War on Terror,
"peace is a byproduct of
Friends, think of what he has said. We must rid the
world of "evil" people in order to have peace.
Surely this has horrific connotations. By the time all the
sinners are defeated, no one will be left.
Who is going to
define "evil?" Will the definition not
eventually expand to include anyone opposed to the "World
Order", whatever that turns out to be?
To get a clearer picture of how this might unfold, see a
recent speech before the Naval War College by General
If you look at the
geography (of Al Qaida) there is no place to put a military
solution. They are networked and they are
all over the world.
[Translation - they are
potentially everyone and they are no one.]
They are a virtual organization connected
by the internet. They use it to
proselytize, recruit, raise money, educate and organize.
[This could just as easily
be the Southern Baptist Convention and one day it will
They have many
pieces that we must focus on: the propaganda battle in
the media, safe houses, front companies, sympathetic
members of legitimate governments, human capital,
fighters and leaders, technical expertise, weapons
suppliers, ideologically sympathetic non-government
organizations (charities), financiers, smugglers,
[This is an exhaustive list. To control "Al Qaida"
we are going to have to control all charities, legitimate governments, financiers, facilitators, media, front companies, human capital [aka people] etc. If
you watch television, virtually all news commentary is for
the purpose of stirring us to action against bogeymen of
every persuasion. This is not limited to Al Qaida but
includes all the heinous crimes and their coverage.
The coverage is about creating animosity among the people
The hobgoblin "Al Qaida"
is the best bogeyman ever invented. "It" can not
even talk back. "It" has no representation in the
UN. "It" has no president. "It" has no
geography, no headquarters. There is no place to put a
on "it." [Does that include Iraq?]
The only time "it" speaks is when a video mysteriously
appears saying- I speak for "it" and "it'
believes bla, bla, bla... [thus "proving" the dark
sentences concerning "Al Qaida"]. "It" can
mysteriously show up in the next country the
powers-that-be need to conquer.
Hard to argue with the
video quoting the non-existing, unknowable "virtual
connected by the internet". One of these videos appeared
to influence the recent presidential election [the week
before the election, hehe] and people actually took this
seriously. By the time "evil" is defeated
the terrible choices
revealed in the Bible will be a reality.
from the webpage-
We read how the enemies of the country plan to overthrow
the United States as "blowback" from the 9-11
conspiracy. Since there are so many websites
devoted to conspiracy theories (especially those
supposedly perpetrated by the United States), I make
this observation - remember, an
intelligence operation can be against the United States White
House instead of by the United States White
House. So, when you try to oppose
the "9-11 conspiracy", you actually make the "blowback
conspiracy" successful. That is why there are so
many conspiracy websites. Most conspiracy websites
are actually the blowback-conspiracy itself and many of
those "sounding the alarm" are the enemies of the
DGP: Yes, there are. And from
this, Alex, and I bring this out very clearly in book
3, the only way we can stop it is with the classic
counter-coup d'etat where the military steps in.
And under the aegis of the military itself, disengaging or
disemboweling the civilian hierarchy and taking over
and re-running or re-organizing the federal
AJ: Now the problem is they've got so many CFR
minions in the Pentagon. We know that Clinton had some
officers terminated and, in their office, shot
multiple times and the rest of it. We know that that
happened but the question is how many of the high
level officers are on the globalist team?
DGP: I can only say several of the highest
level are members now of the Council on
Foreign Relations. The important thing to
consider is how many of them are sincere in their
beliefs as enunciated by the CFR. I
believe there are several sleepers and I believe I
know some of them personally who are three and
four-star generals. They are members of the CFR but "their heart
belongs to Jesus," if I can use that
expression because they are true Semper Fidelity
people. Some of them happen to be Marines. And I'm
counting on them to do the right thing. And I bring
this out in book 3.
So, if and when we see the military take the
country back from the CFR bogeyman, we will know the fix
is in. Notice that they are hoping that those
whose "heart belongs to Jesus" will conduct a counter
coup d'etat. This plays into the hands of the
ultimate purpose of the Clash of
Civilizations, blame for and elimination of the
fundamentalists. They want the "heart-belongs-to-Jesus"
boys to overthrow their own government. In case
you forgot, Operation
Iraqi Freedom was initially called Operation Infinite
Justice. Get it?
05-20-2006 - 05-21-2006
In spite of what may be good intentions by present leaders
in their desire to win the GWOT, what will happen to the constitution
when the Global War on Terror proceeds under other
leadership? Will the executive branch of government
Look at this quote-
Finally, the (a) Senate Committee on
Intelligence of the (b) Republican Party took a really
sensational step (c) March 2007. In a carefully drafted
document it told the (d) Speaker of the House that, although
he was formally responsible for (e) the United States'
war policy, he must obey the orders of the (f) Chief
Substitute the actual
phrase from the original quote-
(a) Reichstag group
(b) Centre Party
(c) October 16, 1916
(d) Reich Chancellor
(f) Supreme Command
The rest of the quote is
and that whatever the decree issued by them, the Reichstag
was prepared to support it. The significance of this
far beyond the immediate dispute concerning
unrestricted submarine warfare [substitute war-on-terror, wire tapping, Patriot
Act, Homeland Security, etc]; it was, in fact, the
first formal recognition of the dictatorship of the German
Army leaders, not only in the military, but also in
political affairs, and the subordination of the Reich's
Government and the Reichstag to that dictatorship."
(B. Menne, The
Case of Dr. Bruening.) found here- http://www.geocities.com/visplace/vatican10.htm
The fears of Americans are
being preyed upon to bring us closer to such an
eventuality. In our case, it might not be the
dictatorship by the military, but, by some increased
executive element. The historical discussion (the
role of the Vatican in Germany, and elsewhere, during the
20th century) in the link above is interesting in and of
In general, our country is under attack on several fronts:
(a) massive Federal debt approaching $8,400,000,000,000
(50% foreign owned)
(b) $5,000,000,000+ per week to fight a war in Iraq and
Afghanistan (per Congressman Ron Paul)
(total cost todate to occupy Iraq and Aghanistan =
(d) massive and unchecked immigration of a poor population
from our Southern border
(e) a never ending strategy of war and Middle-eastern
military bases in perpetuity
(f) a debt inspired (and vulnerable) economy
(g) an entitlement minded society with already booked and
increasing future liabilities with a gutless Congress
refusing to deal with the problem
deliberate? strategy to threaten the Protestant heritage
(i) the globalization plan to get rid of the middle class,
via the use of debt and global trade
(j) the plan to merge the US, Canada, Mexico into one
NAFTA-like country http://www.manews.org/0805elitesmerg.html
(l) the lies of politicians regarding the "benefits" of
the global economy
(m) the ever increasing encroachment against the
constitution to save us from "terrorism" and other
(n) the increasingly militarized attitude of our
(o) the 2005 trade deficit of $700,000,000,000
One recalls the words of Malachi
Martin, now deceased,
"The other two major contenders in the millennium
endgame will be ELIMINATED " (* emphasis
added). (p. 657)
The fearful thing is that
one (the Soviets) of these contenders is already
eliminated. The greatest tool used to eliminate the
Soviets? Financial ruin. Could the United
States be next? Do a search on inflation in the
For perspective, read- http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vatican_in_world_politics_introduction.html
While all the above geopolitical destruction of the United
States proceeds unabated, the focused public debate is
family values, abortion, birth control, women in the
priesthood, and the weirdo fundamentalist abduction du
Let's wildly speculate momentarily, even if only as a
point of reference. Witness Malachi Martin's cover quote-
"untold story behind the Vatican's role in today's
race against time to establish, maintain, and
control the first one-world government. "
Suppose the White House is in a proxy war with the Vatican
who has an intelligence arm (Jesuit?) coopting some Muslim
terrorism. Sounds ridiculous, but, use this
assumption as a method of thinking of some of the
operational situations. If that were the case, would
not every attempt by the United States to create
"democracy" in the Middle East [read US hegemony by the
Vatican] be offset by a convenient "insurgency?"
Could not every foray into "peace" that did not meet all
the objectives of the Vatican be "interrupted" by
sectarian violence. The real question is not whether
this wild speculation is true, but whether Malachi Martin
was correct. If he was correct, there has to be
many, not some, mechanisms for the following to be true
[regardless of the verity of the above speculation]-
"if tomorrow or next week, by a sudden miracle, a
one-world government were established, the Church would
not have to undergo any essential structural change in
order to retain its DOMINANT position and to FURTHER its
(* emphasis added) (p. 143)
Why is there so much more
readily available information regarding Vatican duplicity
on the internet? Is it possible that elements
within the United States and elements
within the Vatican have a "partnership" designed to raise
the ire of conservative Protestant fundamentalists and
conservative Muslims (both of whom are viewed as the
obstacle to world order - Muslims opposing the emergence
of the US presence in the Middle East and Protestants
opposing the primacy of the Vatican and "causing" Bush to
invade Iraq)? Once their ire is raised, outrageous
action can be induced (or staged). Eliminating the
outrageous action becomes the modus vivendi of the world
order (aka Book of Revelation). Whether or
not the above scenario is an exact depiction of the
catalyzer, the resultant volatile chemistry will be as
depicted. It is a sad fact of history that both the
Muslims and now the conservative "Christians" are willing
participants in their own destruction. All you
Southern Baptist [I'll pick on you since I have
been in your Sunday schools] flag waving
patriots demanding the defeat of Islam are demanding your
own demise. Be sure of your salvation and stop
falling for all the propaganda lest you and your lost
neighbor be spewed into the tribulation together.
[For those of you having trouble with this, let me spell
it out for you - Bush is a victim, just like the rest of the
unsuspecting world, of a
geopolitical maneuver by some group(s) (which
includes blame for a "conspiracy"). This commentary
about politics; it is about the conditions preceding the
Second Coming of The Lord Jesus Christ. If you want
to play politics (i.e., defend Republicans, accuse
Democrats or vice versa) then go ahead and hang around and
get in line for the mark of the beast. The
alternative to playing politics is the sovereignty of THE
ALMIGHTY GOD. I am going with the later and staying
out of the line for the mark of
the beast. The point here is that there
is NO MAN-MADE solution to what is about to beset the
world, especially when you consider the enormous power of
those behind the already developed scenario. If you
want to waste your time saying that things will continue
as they have been, you are whistling past the grave
yard. After this plays out, there will be no more
America as we know it.]
Many church goers are totally deceived, yes, church goers,
not the unchurched-
first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers,
walking after their own lusts, and saying where is the
promise of His coming? for since the fathers
fell asleep, all
things continue as they were from the beginning
of the creation. - 2 Pet 3:3-4
They do not believe He is coming and they DO believe they
must save the world for "Christianity". At a recent
Bible prophecy conference, 4000 people http://www.omegaletter.com/articles.asp?ArticleID=5767,
none raised their hand when asked if their church taught
that Jesus is coming. In fact, according to the
author, the apathy
factor has grown since 9-11. That is
amazing to me. 9-11 is the primary reason I started
this website! It was a sure sign of a GIGANTIC GEOPOLITICAL EVENT.
If you try to talk endtimes with these church folk, they
say you can not know He is coming. But, the Bible
says you WILL know, if you are His, of the general time of
But ye, brethren, are not in
darkness, that that day should overtake you as a
thief. Ye are all the children of light, and
the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do
others; but let us watch and be sober. -- 1 Thessalonians 5:4-6 End
05-20-2006 - 05-21-2006
One of the biggest threats to peace is reportedly
Iran. One of the main reasons Iran is reported to be
a threat is outrageous statements attributed to the leader
Ahmadinejad. A friend of mine, Rob, and I have
actually discussed whether or not Ahmadinejad is a
possible "plant" of some kind (since most things he says
in public seem to harm his own country).
Today, I found this interview-
is a political activist and close aide to former Iranian
President Hashemi Rafsanjani. He is the founder of three
newspapers, Hamshahri, Kargozaran, and
Sharq (the latter, recently closed). He was
interviewed by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach in his Tehran office
on Dec. 7, and spoke through an interpreter.
There are various views of the new situation of Iran,
which can be divided into three categories. Some here are
very concerned about a situation where the whole political
structure of the region may be compromised; some think
nothing will happen; and some believe the situation will
get worse. I'm inclined to the third viewpoint. The two
viewpoints at opposite extremes belong to the radicals in
Iran. Those who believe nothing will happen mainly belong
to what are often called the hardliners in the right-wing
camp. Mr. Ahmadinejad represents this viewpoint. This
viewpoint can also be seen in the people affiliated with
the Basij [see below], or others affiliated with the
right-wing faction. Such a viewpoint is not far-fetched on
the part of military people, because the military always
talk tough; but politicians are expected to behave
differently. So, we don't endorse these views of Mr.
course, his views are not limited to Iran. They sometimes
also threaten other countries—you can understand this in
the way he wrote a letter to President Bush and in his
speeches at the United Nations, from his position on the
Palestinians, Israel, etc. This suggests these people
think that Iran is the center of the universe and can
bring about any change they want. This is also false and
cannot be accepted...
is a strong, serious challenge between the first and the
third groups. The hardliners now in power are just a
minority of 20%, against a large majority of 60-70% who
are out of power. This large majority is like the body, and
the head—the 20%—now controls everything. This is what
the current picture of Iran is...
political activists criticize is that this military
structure was heavily involved in the  elections.
This was opposed by Mr. Rafsanjani and by Mr. Karroubi,
and all reformist parties protested. The Supreme leader
[Ayatollah Khamenei] was expected to intervene, to
organize a fact-finding team to look into the Basij
involvement. From three to four months prior to the
elections, some 400 opinion polls, scientific surveys,
were conducted, locally, regionally, and nationally. None indicated a
win by Mr. Ahmadinejad. What happened? Is it
possible that an unidentified, unknown person could win?
Or is it a miracle, though we say the era of the
Prophets is over? Or, there must be irregularity, vote
performance of Ahmadinejad in the first year, has been
such that he has alienated many of his wise supporters,
even many people in his government, his cabinet. So, Ahmadinejad
was not democratically elected, although there was the
appearance of a democratic process. It was influenced
by forces from the outside. . . .
So, since Iran is now
reportedly a major source of the problems in Iraq (and no
longer the bogeyman "al-Qaeda", good grief) and all the
"terrorism" problems are chiefly coming from Iran and Iran
is the major problem with the Hizbollah, etc, etc; then,
who are the presumably "terrorist" forces from the outside
who got Amhadinejad elected? (My answer- the same people who
manipulated Bush to invade Iraq). If you believe
defeating the "enemy" in Iran is going to save the planet,
Sorry, I just do not believe everything I see on TV, you
know, the one that tells you what you should think about
and what you should think about it. All this does
not add up properly. My point is simple - the world
is being lead to the slaughter through dark
sentences. My advice - do not be around to see this
come to fruition.
There is more happening than the total collapse of the US
dollar and the US economy.
If you want to know how much the dollar is dropping, watch
the price of gold.
Gold goes up because the dollar is worth less. Gold
is screaming a loud message now.
Now for the news of the day-
Another shocking, blatant coverup
The [Mexican] war was
also the first time (of many, many more to come) that
the US government outright lied as a pretext to declare
war. The official story spun by President James Polk at
the time was that Mexican forces invaded the United
States, unprovoked, and ‘shed American blood on American
This account has been rejected by
historians, as well as by Grant in his memoirs:
“We were sent to provoke a fight, but
it was essential that Mexico should commence it. It was
very doubtful whether Congress would declare war; but if
Mexico should attack our troops, the Executive could…
prosecute the contest with vigor. Once initiated there
were but few public men who would have the courage to
Grant later writes, “Experience proves
that the man who obstructs a war in which his nation is
engaged, no matter whether right or wrong, occupies no
enviable place in life or history.”
Not much has changed. The next 165
years of warfare in the United States are filled with
lies, deceit, false flag operations, imperialistic
conquest, and state-sponsored media propaganda. Those who
dared question the official stories were vilified and
dismissed as unpatriotic conspiracy theorists.
The most recent example was the capture and
death of Osama bin Ladin in May 2011 by the famed SEAL
There are so many questions, so many
holes in the official story– the conspicuous location in a
small town surrounded by Pakistani military, the handling
of the body in accordance with a Muslim tradition that
doesn’t exist, the refusal to provide any real evidence to
verify the claim, etc.
US mainstream media largely gave Obama
a pass on these questions and focused instead on the
nationwide euphoria over the news.
Now the United States Congress is
trying to lock down, once and for all, any further hint of
question about the event with a new bill, HR 2819. The bill prohibits
any “officer or employee of the Federal Government from
providing information about the mission to kill Osama
bin Laden to any person outside the Federal Government…”
This essentially silences anyone who
might be able to shed some light on the event.
The gag order would remain in effect until
the CIA and Defense Department conduct their own
‘investigations’ and brief Congress; in other words,
several years at least. [At least until the 3rd Tues
in November 12 - smile]
It’s ironic that the government often
relies on an insipidly weak logic when it erodes the
privacy of its citizens. If you don’t like how USA PATRIOT
Act provisions allow then to tap your telephone or check
out your rental history, they say, “Hey, if you have
nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear!”
Obviously the same reasoning doesn’t apply
to them… and it’s another example of the tragic farce that is
For those of us who are
naive, Bin Laden died of renal failure probably in late
The so-called raid on "Bin Laden" happened in a CIA
"property" probably in CIA control for years. The cameras
showing the operation went off for the last 40 minutes of
the "operation." Therefore, nobody saw
the operation, probably including Seal Team Six (because
the last steps of the operation were done by the CIA while
"Seal Team Six" stood guard on the perimeter.) Even
if "Seal Team Six" participated, they could have
seen nothing of "Bin Laden."
A simple question - why did members of "Seal Team Six" die
recently? This is a serious question.
Obama did not approve the "operation." The "operation" was
decided upon and he was TOLD by the CIA that it was in progress .
Then, Obama goes on 60 Minutes and says "I did this and I
Why was it necessary to keep a dead man alive long enough
to kill him?
Why did Zbigniew Brzezinski say there is no such thing as
organized iternational Islamic terrorism?
Why did the CIA officer not arrest Bin Laden in the
American Hospital in Dubai in the summer of 2001?
Could it be because Bin Laden was a CIA asset? And,
who was the Bin Laden who made video tapes after he was
dead and released them for the Presidential election of
You can compose your own questions from this point.
It is not
deliberate that I am answering this question
today. It just turned out that way. I
received the question this morning and I just noticed that
it is the 10 year anniversary of the birth of the TSA and
the Patriot Act. Oops, the Patriot Act was written
before 9-11 and readily available for Congressional
approval (or do they really approve legislation any
more?). We know they do not read or write
legislation, nor can we find out what is in legislation
until we approve it... I digress
Letter from Reader
When you get time, read this and see if you agree,
especially paragraph 4.
This adds weight to the widely-held view that the
central bankers are responsible for most terrorism, using
MI-6, Mossad and the CIA. Dr. Day also said that "war is
obsolete" given the danger of nuclear exchange so terrorism
would be used instead. This was 1969.
Response for All Readers-
My first reaction is that somebody is out to bring down
the bankers. See this for the potential origin of such
a movement. Truly, Malachi Martin says
in his book that the Western Capitalists (would this not
include the Central Banks, owned by private banks?) will
be eliminated. Martin
refers to the Western Capitalists as the Golden
(in contrast with the Red Internationale the moniker often
associated with communism). As Martin writes on page
657 - "The other two
major contenders in the millennium endgame will be
" (* emphasis added).
My second reaction is that
this is the 10th anniversary of the biggest fraud in the
history of the United States. If people believe that
9-11 was perpetrated by 19 Muslims (some of whom were
alive after 9-11 because they apparently survived crashing
into buildings while flying jets), then these people who believe
the 19 Muslims did it are conspiracy theorists that
believe the 9-11 Commission's Official Conspiracy
Theory. By definition, what is presented in the
official account is a conspiracy.
On the morning of 9-11, as
I sat in the dentist chair, the dental assistance told me
around 9:15 what had happened. At that moment, I
said to myself "they
have done it." I said this on 9-11-2001
because of the years of study I had done leading up to the
are the intelligence community, the subject of many years
study for me. In a 1993 manuscript I authored it
says "the people will
demand that the government control their lives on
account of terrorism."
What most people do not understand is that there are so
many "contractors" involved in the military and
intelligence community that one can hardly call these
contractors citizen "soldiers." They are
mercenaries who have controllers. These
"controllers" can be anyone with any agenda. And
there are MANY levels above the controllers. Good
luck identifying who the top layer is. If we
can run the government WITHOUT having had a budget for
YEARS, we certainly can "run" the intelligence community
without any Congressional/Governmental oversight.
Congress is nothing but a facade to make the people
believe they have a democracy, God forbid we call it a
Republic. Congress is completely controlled by staff
("contractors" if you want to call them that because they
took no oath), especially in the writing of legislation
and the process by which legislation is considered.
As an historical example of intelligence at the top,
the Vatican for all practical purposes was THE source of
information for the CIA during the Cold War. One could say
that the Vatican WAS the CIA to some extent. There
is a book documenting how the Vatican Ratlines enabled
WWII Nazis to enter the CIA post WWII. Later,
1958-1963, two socialist and/or "red" Popes were
elected in the Vatican Curia by the KGB, the Vatican
turned pro-Soviet and kicked the "pestilential rats" (the
CIA) out of the Vatican [the Pope who kicked out the CIA
had previously, before he became Pope, himself been kicked
out of the Vatican by the CIA], a president who fired the
director of the CIA and threatened to break "the CIA into
a thousand pieces" and threatened to print US Treasury
Notes (instead of Federal Reserve Notes) was murdered, and a Pope was murdered so
that a John Paul II could be elected by the
CIA. The President was JFK and the man he
fired, Allen Dulles, sat on the Warren Commission.
Do you believe these facts are completey unrelated to
9-11? If you believe they are unrelated it is
because you are looking at the ocean through a
straw. This straw is provided to you by the
media. I NEVER watch the media any more because the
definition of news (as presented) is a sick joke.
For me, this has been true for at least 35 years.
There is PLENTY of evidence to support an alternative
conspiracy theory. The problem is that most people,
because of their emotional allegiance and dependence on
certain worldviews vis-a-vis the United States, can not psychologically
permit themselves to even look at the facts.
If we took one hour to examine the facts and had an open
mind, our worldview would be changed forever. This
is an emotional risk we can not take because this
risk leads to a certain mental loss of those things we
hold dear. This brings us to the ultimate
question - on what does our hope and faith rest?
I could write a dissertation the size of this website
about 9-11. I will refrain from doing so because if
you are a seeker you will discover the truth in any
case. If you are not a seeker, you will never find
delve into this topic not because I believe the process of
dictatorship, which is prophesied in the Bible, can be
stopped; but, because the 9-11 Conspiracy and our refusal
to accept the truth of it is exactly how the world
government will come to pass. By the way, if we try
to stop the process, it will happen faster. That is
why some want us to take to the street.
If you are a seeker- See the books by David Ray
Warning, the David Ray Griffin site may become, if not
already, coopted. Today is the first day I went to
I read none of it. However, I have read 5 of the
books by Griffin. The site and movement seems to be
evolving into a religious
kingdom movement. The likely outcome is that
the 9-11 truth movement will be denigrated as a whipping
boy comparable to the accusations against the Tea Party
(when they tried to reduce spending) and thus "caused" the
financial crisis. In a similar manner the 9-11 truth
movement will become a generic "religious"
My friend, I have said over
and over and over on this website-
stay out of the streets, live peacably, obey the laws, and
wait on the LORD because there is NOTHING you can do
to stop the WILL of GOD. His will includes
the Coming of the Antichrist and the mark without which
you can neither buy nor sell. That is, all
those not taken in the Rapture
will come under the total
control of the government.
The ONLY thing that matters is Have you accepted Jesus
Christ as your Lord and Savior?
Do not become a Kingdom
The purpose of this website is to make sure you realize
you have NO earthly choices left, the Bible is true, its
prophecies are coming to pass quickly, and Jesus Christ is
your only option. Choose this day whom ye will
We have discussed before that the War on Terror (aka Clash of Civilizations)
has ulterior motives.
Here we read an account of one who was taken prisoner and
placed into a camp for "al-Qaeda" terrorists.
For educational purposes, read the whole article. It
will give you a new perspective.
Well ... what are the chances that the son of the Bush
family's main business contact in Saudi Arabia – a
family that is worth billions – suddenly becomes a
fanatical, fundamentalist Muslim and then supposedly
blows up the World Trade Towers? Pretty coincidental,
I'd say. And there are plenty of stories of bin Laden
traveling to the US in the 1990s under the name of Tim
Osman to recruit for his cause, a cause apparently
sponsored by the CIA. After all, the CIA seemingly was
responsible for aggregating the original so-called al
Qaeda in the 1980s when they were recruiting young
radicals to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. They
collected a data base that they called the base – as in
al Qaeda. It was a "list." The CIA seems obviously
involved in the inception of al Qaeda, though they deny
the alternative is a kind of war. In Abyan Province in
the South of Yemen, the Americans are shelling certain
urban areas on a daily basis – places where rebellious
tribesmen and al Qaeda are said to be. They are sending
in Saudi and American planes as well, and at night they
are apparently sending in SEALS with night-fighting
equipment. This is a significant illegal action. America
apparently has numerous troops on the ground on a
nightly basis – and yet you read nothing about this is
press. America is very far gone now,
from a truth-telling standpoint. Almost everything
reported in the mainstream press in America and even the
West is a lie of some sort, or at least a fudge. The
purpose is always the same – to promote world
government. In fact, the more the Internet tells the
truth, the more the mainstream press does not. It's as
if the elite banking families that run the world are
trying to counteract the truth with lies and
Daily Bell: Why
would they do such a thing?
Staffer: Obviously to
take away more freedoms in the West. The target on this
mostly phony war on terror, in my view, is the
West and the middle class. The elites have been
after middle class freedoms for over a century. With the
war on terror, they have has a reason to escalate
considerably. The Patriot
Act, with all of its reductions in what was left of
freedom in the US, was written before 9/11. During its
signing they had the military patrolling the corridors of
Congress with guns. Congressmen were intimidated. The
situation in America and the West has gotten no better
since then. The great families want world government and
they are willing to remove any freedoms they need to in
order to get it.
Daily Bell: So the
war on terror has little to do with al Qaeda?
Staffer: In the
prison I was in, people told me over and over that America
and Yemen were actually producing radicalized young men
with their incarceration policies.
Daily Bell: How did
personally met only one man who claimed to be a legitimate
member of al Qaeda in a jail that supposedly was chock
full of al Qaeda. The rest were young men, mostly, who had
the misfortune of holding somewhat fundamentalist, or at
least enthusiastic, views about Islam.
Daily Bell: Thought
crimes, in other words.
Staffer: Sure. Some
examples. A shopkeeper from Kenya who was taken prisoner
some six months ago for speaking to someone who held
fundamentalist views 17 years before. He was put in an
even worse prison than the one I was in. The worst prison
in Yemen, where all the hard-core Jihadists are supposedly
locked up. He said it consisted of single, individual
cells – it was dungeonlike, in other words – and that you
were not let out even to go to the bathroom except
occasionally. He said the primary entertainment consisted
of sitting on a ratty mattress watching your urine pool in
front of you. After several months of this, he was moved
to the prison where I was. By then he'd developed severe
high blood pressure. It was aggravated by the
interrogations. He said he was always being dragged in
front of Americans from the embassy and that his
questioners included one Asian man, apparently from the
CIA, who was always shouting at him that he would spend
the rest of his life in prison if he didn't reveal
information that he knew. The trouble was that he was only
a shopkeeper and didn't know anything. His last
significant Islamic conversation occurred 17 years ago. He
was desperate to get out because he had a business and a
family and his business was in ruins after nine months.
Daily Bell: Why
didn't they let him go?
Staffer: Well, this
is the sad part. The entire political prison system in
Yemen is built on the idea that there are many al Qaeda
who need to be identified. Thus, the Americans may pay a
bounty for such people – of one sort or another – and the
Yemeni authorities are glad to oblige by fueling the
charade with innocent people.
So, how long, dear friend
before the USA is itself subjected to such treatment?
... let's look at the realities. The dictators being
deposed in the Middle East are all secular. Hosni Mubarak of
Egypt, Ben Ali of Tunisia, Muammar Gaddafi of
Libya – all of them are non-Islamic types. And what will
come about now? Probably the Muslim Brotherhood in
one way or another. The Brotherhood is apparently
penetrated and to a degree controlled by the CIA. So you
have the spectacle of the West actively deposing
secularists in order to replace them with controllable
Muslim entities. Of course, it won't be portrayed that
way in the West. The Muslim Brotherhood will be painted
as a radical sect that poses an immediate danger to the
Evidence of Dark Sentences
This is a multi-part video series. There was a 1
hour and 28 minute video. Perhaps they modified it
in these parts.
start at the 7 minute mark
Aurora and Sandy Hook are both in Dark Knight Rises
What are we to do about this? Absolutely
nothing. There is nothing you can do but pray.
Only get right with the Lord.
Even this is a matter for the individual conscience.
It is between you and the Lord only.
How Is A Man Saved?
Please e-mail us
with questions or comments today. I may be
wrong, but, the Bible is never wrong.